1982-05-19May 19, 1982 (R.ezgul~r Night Meeting)
May 19, 1982 (Executive Session--Adjourned from May 13, 1982)
An adjourned meeting'of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was
held on May 19, 1982, at 5:30 P.M., at the Hardware Store Restaurant, Charlottesville,
Virginia; said meeting adjourned from May 13, 1982.
Present: Mrs. Patricia H. Cooke, Messrs. Gerald E. Fisher, J. T. Henley, Jr., C. Timothy
Lindstrom and Miss Ellen V. Nash.
Absent: Mr. James R. Butler.
Officers Present:
County Attorney.
Mr. Guy B. Agnor, Jr., County Executive and Mr. George R. St. John,
Agenda Item No. 1.
Fisher.
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 P.M. by the Chairman, Mr.
Agenda Item No. 2. At 6:01 P.M., motion was offered by Mr. Lindstrom, seconded by Miss
Nash, to adjourn into executive session to discuss legal matters concerning future negotiations
with the City, personnel matters and property matters. Roll was called and the motion
carried by the following recorded, vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
Mrs. Cooke, Messrs. Fisher, Henley, Lindstrom and Miss Nash.
None.
Mr. Butler.
The Board reconvened into open session at 7:25 P.M. and immediately adjourned.
CHAIRMAN
May 19, 198~2 '('Regular Night Meeting)
A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was held
on May 19, 1982, at 7:30 P.M., in Meeting Room #7, Second Floor, County Office Building, 401
McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Present: Mr. James R. Butler, Mrs. Patricia H. Cooke, Messrs. Gerald E. Fisher, J. T.
Henley, Jr., C. Timothy Lindstrom and Miss Ellen V. Nash.
Absent: None.
Officers Present: County Executive, Guy B. Agnor, Jr.; County Attorney, George R. St.
John (Arrived at 7:39 P.M..); and County Planner, Robert W~ Tucker, Jr.
Age'nda Item No. 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M. by the Chairman, Mr.
Fisher.
Agenda Item No. 2. SP-82-9. Augusta Lumber & Supply, Inc. To locate a permanent
sawmill on 27.930 acres zoned RA. Property is located on the western side of Rt. 712 opposite
Rt. 813 and approximately 600 feet northwest of the Southern Railroad tracks at the existing
Augusta Lumber site near North Garden. County Tax Map 99, Parcel 49A. Samuel Miller District
(Advertised in the Daily Progress on May 5 and May 12, 1982.)
Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., Director of Planning, presented the following staff report:
"Request: Permanent sawmill
Acreage: 27.93 acres
Zoning: RA Rural Areas
Location: Property, described as Tax Map 99, Parcel 49A, is located on the
west side of Rt. 712 about a quarter of a mile north of the Southern
Railroad
Character of the Area: This property is developed with a nonconforming
sawmill and lumber yard. A single-family dwelling exists immediately
adjacent to the north. The closest single-family dwelling to the south
is owned by the applicant. In 1978, a special use permit was approved
for the location of a sawmill on property to the south and west.
Staff Comment: The applicant proposes to construct a 31,165 square foot
drying kiln which would have capacity of 405,000 board feet in the
pre-dryer and 405,000 board feet in the dry kilns. Heat would be provided
from a 1,200 square foot wood-fired boiler plant, which would be
housed separately. Waste from the existing milling plant would fuel
the boiler plant.
Currently some lumber is air dried on-site, which requires a 90 day
storage, compared to 30 days for kiln drying. Recently, due to changes
in European import regulations, the applicant has been trucking oak
lumber to other plants for kiln drying and then returning the lumber
to the site to await shipment. On-site kiln drying would reduce truck
traffic.
May 19, 1982 (Regular Night Meeting)
Staff opinion is that approval of this special use permit to allow the
construction of the drying kiln may have the following benefits:
1)
2)
3)
This would be an energy-efficient use, since waste from the milling
operation would fire the kiln. This would reduce problems of waste
storage and disposal. Hopefully, some of the existing waste could be
used in this manner;
Kiln drying would reduce storage time by 60 days, which may result
in a reduced number of lumber stacks on the property;
On-site kiln drying could reduce truck traffic.
In addition to the opinions stated above, other aspects favorable to this
petition are as follows:
1)
2)
3)
Staff opinion is that the request complies with the Comprehensive
Plan recommendations that agricultural and forestal uses should be
encouraged;
Staff opinion is that the request is consistent with the statement
of intent of the RA District;
This use would provide basic employment in the North Garden
village area;
This use would be consistent with other uses in the area. Appropriate
conditions of approval could improve the existing situation in regard
to compatibility to the area.
Supplementary Regulations: The following supplementary regulations are
applicable to this petition. (Section 5.1.23 addresses on-site timbering
which is not occuring on this site and therefore the text has not been
included in this report.)
5.1.15 Sawmill, TemPorary or Permanent (See Also Section 5.1.23)
No structure and no storage of lumber, logs, chips or timber
shall be located closer than one hundred feet to any lot line.
Trees and vegetation within the one hundred foot setback shall
be maintained as a buffer to adjoining properties and uses,
provided that during the last three months of operation such
trees may be removed;
No saw, planer, chipper, conveyor, chute or other like machinery
shall be located closer than six hundred feet to any dwelling on
other property in the area;
No sawing, planing, chipping, or operation of other processing
machinery shall occur between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. No
loading/unloading of wood/wood products shall occur between 12:00
midnight and 7:00 a.m.;
Ail timbering and milling operations, including reforestation/.
restoration and disposal of snags, sawdust, and other debris,
shall be conducted in accordance with Title 10 of the Code and
the regulations of the Virginia Division of Forestry;
Ail such operations shall be subject to the noise limitation
requirements of section 4.14.
The Commission and Board may vary or waive any of the provisions in a particular
case. In a letter of March 1, 1982 to the applicant, staff stated that 'should
you wish to seek relief from any of these regulations, you should make your
request in writing, stating your reasons for such request.' The applicant's
letter of March 11, 1982, appears to request relief from the limitations of
hours of operation in item 'c'. Staff would note that the existing development
does not satisfy items 'a' and 'b'. It is unknown to the staff whether the
noise limitations of item 'e' can be met.
Staff also recommended that the applicant contact the Fire Official regarding
fire protection requirements. For a building of the character of the kiln,
a sprinkler system is required when the structure exceeds 12,000 square feet.
This matter is unresolved at this time.
Should the Commission and Board choose to allow the applicant more time to
address the supplementary regulations and the fire requirements, staff would
recommend a thirty day deferral. Should the Commission and Board choose to
act favorably on this petition at this time, the staff recommends the following
conditions:
1)
2)
3)
5)
6)
7)
Compliance with Section 5.1.15 of the Zoning Ordinance (except as the
Commission and Board may modify or vary for a, b, and c);
Compliance with Fire Official recommendations dated March 30, 1982;
Approval is for addition of drying kiln and boiler plant only. Any other
additional uses such as the proposed cut-up plant and planer shed shall
require amendment of this petition;
No storage of lumber between the lumber storage shed and Route 712;
These conditions shall be met prior to issuance of a building permit
for the drying kiln or boiler plant;
Compliance with State Air Pollution Control Board and Environmental
Protection Agency standards for wood-fired boiler;
Dedication of twenty-five feet from the centerline of Route 712."
May 19, 1982 (Regular Night Meeting)
Mr. Tucker said the Planning Commission, at its meeting on April 6, 1982, deferred
action to consider some of the waivers requested by the applicant. An addendum to the staff
report is set out below:
"On April 6, 1982, the Planning Commission deferred action on S?-82-9
to provide an opportunity for further evaluation of the supplementary
regulations, Fire Officials' recommendations, and recommended conditions
of approval. Staff has prepared modifications/waivers of supplementary
regulations (condition #1) for consideration.
1)
Compliance with Section 5.1.15 of the Zoning Ordinance except as
modified or waived below:
(a) Section 5.1.15(a) shall not apply to existing development of the
property; provided that any building or storage area currently
within 100 feet of a property line shall not be expanded or
extended in the direction of the property line. Buildings and
storage areas which are in conformance with 5.1.15(a) shall
remain in conformance with that section;
(b) Section 5.1.15(b) shall not apply to existing development of
the property; provided that any machinery or building housing
such machinery currently within 600 feet to any dwelling on other
property in the area shall not be expanded or relocated in the
direction of such dwelling. Machinery~and buildings, housing
machinery, which are in conformance with 5.1.15(b) shall remain
in conformance with that section;
(c) No sawing, planing, chipping or operation of other processing
machinery (except the boiler plant and drying kiln) shall occur
between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. No loading/unloading of wood/wood
products shall occur between 9 p.m. and 6 a.m.;
(d) Noise measured at the closest dwelling shall not exceed current
levels. The applicant shall submit a certified engineer's report
to the County Engineer which shall specify current noise levels
during normal operation of the milling plant.
2) Compliance with Fire Official recommendations dated March 30, 1982;
3) Approval is for addition of drying kiln and boiler plant only. Any other
additional uses such as the proposed cut-up plant and planer shed shall
require amendment of this petition;
4) No storage of lumber between the existing lumber storage shed and Route 712;
5) Compliance with State Air Pollution Control Board and Environmental
Protection Agency standards for wood-fired boiler;
6) Dedication of twenty-five feet from the centerline of Route 712;
7) These conditions shall be met prior to issuance of a building permit for the
drying kiln or boiler p!ant."~
Mr. Tucker said the Planning Commission, at its meeting on May 4, 1982, unanimously
recommended approval of S?-82-9 with the conditions listed in the foregoing addendum but
dropped condition 4. Mr. Tucker then summarized the following letter from Mr. Ira Cortez,
Fire Prevention Officer, referred to in condition 2 above.
"1. In reference to the above site, any structure classified as Si in the
present building code which exceeds 12,000 square feet, requires a
sprinkler system (Article 1202.8).
2. The installation of dry hydrant to meet the requirements of NFPA 1231 is
also recommended."
Mr. Fisher noted that condition lc pertaining to the time of operation excepts the
boiler plant and drying kiln and asked if they would be permitted to operate twenty-four
hours a day. M~. Tucker said yes.
The public hearing was then opened. Mr. Howard Carr, Vice President of Augusta Lumber
& Supply, Inc., was present and said he did not'have any problems with the conditions.
With no one else present to speak for or against the petition, the public hearing was
closed.
Mr. Fisher said he understands that several weeks ago there were some adjacent !andowner:
who were unhappy with this petition. Mr. Carr said that misunderstanding has been resolved.
Mr. Fisher said since the neighbors are satisfied and the request complies with the Comprehe~-
~i~a~Plan, he would recommend approval. Motion was then offered by Miss Nash, seconded
by Mrs. Cooke, to approve SP-82-9 with the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission.
Roll was called and the motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Butler, Mrs. Cooke, Messrs. Fisher, Henley, Lindstrom, and Miss Nash.
NAYS: None.
Agenda Item No. 3. ZMA-82-5. J. V. Webster with Proffer. To rezone 1 ~cre currently
zoned R-1 to HC with proffer to limit use to machinery and equipment sales, service and
rental; and uses in HC zone that are permitted under C-1 as they may be established under
C-1 regulations. Located on eastern side of Rt. 742 south of Charlottesville ~approximately
3/4 mile north of intersection of Rt. 742 and Rt. 20 South. County Tax Map 90, Parcel 35C.
Scottsville District. (Advertised in the Daily ?rogress on May 5 and May 12, 1982.)
May 19, 1982 (RegUlar Night Me*tin~)
Mr. Tucker presented the following staff report:
"Requested Zoning: HC Highway Commercial (Proffer)
Acreage: 1 acre
Existing Zoning: R-1 Residential
Location: Property, described as Tax Map 90, Parcel 35C, is located north
and adjacent to Certified Welding on Avon Street Extended (Route 742)
Character of the Area: This site is undeveloped, wooded land. Properties
to the north and east are zoned R-1 Residential. Lake Reynovia, zoned R-1
and RA Rural Areas, is across Route 742. To the south are several
properties zoned LI Light Industrial and developed with commercial/
~ndus~'.la~~.-_ ~.~-~tic ~at~'r and~.a~a~n~a¥~l~te '~n t~hls a~e~'.~
Comprehensive Plan: This site is located in Neighborhood 4 of the Urban
Area ~ the Comprehensive Plan. The plan recommends commercial and
industrial uses in this area.
Applicant's Proffer: Under HC Highway Commercial zoning, the applicant
has proffered to limit the use of the property to 'machinery and
equipment sales, service and rent&l' and to uses in the HC Highway
Commercial district that are permitted in the C-1 district as they
may be established under C-1 regulations.
Staff Comment: The applicant currently sells farm equipment at the
Horseman's Saddlery, which is located on the south side of Certified
Welding. This rezoning is being sought in order to relocate the farm
equipment sales. HC Highway Commercial is the only conventional zoning
district which permits this usage, however, HC Highway Commercial is
intended to be located on major highways such as Route 29 North. In
order to justify the appropriateness of HC Highway Commercial zoning
on Route 742, the applicant has proffered limitations of uses for the
property. Essentially, the applicant is requesting C-1 Commercial
zoning plus 'machinery and equipment sales, service and rental'.
Staff opinion is that the applicant's proffered rezoning request is
consistent with Comprehensive Plan recommendations and with the
character of commercial/industrial development along Avon Street
Extended. Staff recommends approval of this petition."
Mr. Tucker said the Planning Commission, at its meeting on May 4, 1982, recommended
approval of ZMA-82-5 with the following proffer as contained in the applicant's application
of March 12, 1982: "H-C limited use to machinery and equipment sales, service and rental;
and uses in H-C zone that are permitted under C-1 as they may be established under C-1
regulations." Mr. Fisher requested that the application containing the proffer be retained
for the Board's records. (Copy of application on file in the Clerk of the Board's office.)
Miss Nash asked the zoning of the small lots south of this property. Mr. Tucker said
the zoning is Light Industrial. Miss Nash then asked if there were any residential uses
between this parcel and the property known as Snow's Nursery. Mr. Tucker said no. Mr.
Lindstrom asked why this property was zoned R-1. Mr. Tucker said this property was vacant
when the Comprehensive Plan was being reviewed. Therefore, it was decided to wait until a
specific request was made to change the zoning even though the Comprehensive Plan does
recommend industrial or commercial type uses. Mr. Tucker further explained the zoning
around the subject property.
The public hearing was then opened. Ms. Christina Bruce was present on behalf of the
applicant, Mr. J. V. Webster, who was out of town. With no one else present to speak for
or against the petition, the public hearing was closed.
Miss Nash felt this area was an obvious location for commercial development. With the
proffer, she did not feel it would be improper to approve this request and offered motion
to approve ZMA-82-5 with the proffer as recommended by the Planning Commission. Mr. Butler
seconded the motion and same carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Butler, Mrs. Cooke, Messrs. Fisher, Henley, Lindstrom, and Miss Nash.
None.
Agenda Item No. 4. SP-82-15. Thomas A. Moore. To locate a private school in an
existing private residence at 107 Middlesex Drive, consisting of 12,000 square feet zoned
R-4. Located off Barracks Road at Route 250 Bypass, right onto Ricky Road, right onto
Middlesex, house number 107 at corner of Middlesex and King George Circle. County Tax Map
61K, Parcel 08-C-11. Charlottesville District. (Advertised in the Daily Progress on May 5
and May 12, 1982.)
Mr. Tucker presented the following staff report:
"Request: Private school
Acreage: 0.23 acre (9,865 square feet)
Zoning: R-4 Residential
Location: Property, described as Tax Map 61K, Parcel 08-C-11, further
described as 107 Middlesex Drive, is located at the intersection of Middlesex
Drive and King George Circle in Queen Charlotte Subdivision.~
Character of the Area: This property is developed with a single-family dwelling.
Chain link fencing surrounds the rear yard and play equipment. The average
lot size in Queen Charlotte is less than one quarter of an acre.
?
MaZ 19,.~1982 (Regular Night Meeting)
Applicant's Proposal: Mr. and Mrs. Moore propose to operate .a school for up to
twenty-five students from 9 A.M. to 12 noon weekdays. No employees
a~;~proposed at this time.
Staff Comment: While this petition was made under 'private school', staff
has reviewed the proposal as a nursery school, since the children would
be ages 2 1/2 through six years. Due to the hours of operation, the State
Welfare Department willnot require licensure. (Licensure is required
under 5.t.6(a) of the Zoning Ordinance.) Should the Commission and Board
choose to approve this petition, waiver of that section would be required.
In past reviews, the Planning staff and Fire Official have
recommended the following standards'
Minimum Standard and Source
35 ft. of floor area/child (Fire Official)
200 ft. indoor airspace/child (Va. Dept. of Welfare)
25 ft. indoor play area/child (Va. Dept. of Welfare)
75 ft. developed outdoor play area/child (Va. Dept.
of Welfare)
1 parking Space/10 children + ! space/employee (Z.O.)
1. adult supervisor/10 children (Va. Dept. of Welfare)
Requirements for sP-82-15
875 ft.
5000 ft.
625 ft.
1875 ft.
5 parking spaces
3 adult supervisors
Staff observations in regard to this petition are as follows:
l)
This use could generate traffic in a volume not normally expected in a
subdivision of this nature. The school could generate as much as 100
vehicle triPs per day or the equivalent of ten dwellings.
2)
Outdoor activity could cause noise not normally expected in the area. At
four dwellings/acre, Queen Charlotte is relatively dense for a single-family
detached subdivision. Staff would expect noise to affect a greater number
of people than in a low density setting. However, because of the limited
hours of operation this may not prove to be a problem.
3)' From visual inspection, the site appears inadequate for the intended use.
Without substantially altering the residential character of the property,
it does not appear that the developed play area and five off-street
parking spaces with necessary circulation aisles could be accommodated
on the property. Should this petition be approved, the applicant may
wish to seek variances from 4.12.3 of the Zoning Ordinance which requires
that parking be provided off-street.
Staff opinion is that reasonable use is being made of the property as a
single-family dwelling and that current zoning is appropriate. Staff opinion
is that the intensity of the proposed use is inappropriate to the area.
Additionally, it does not appear that the recommended standards or zoning
requirements could be satisfied as the school is currently proposed. Therefore,
staff recommends denial. However, should the Commission and Board choose to
approve this petition, staff recommends the following conditions:
1)
2)
3)
Permit is issued to the applicant and is nontransferrable;
Compliance with Section 5.1.6 Supplementary Regulations; Section 5.1.6(a)
is waived; subject to written verification from Virginia Department of
Welfare;
Staff approval of parking and landscaping of parking area, if applicable;
5)
Fire Official and Building Official approvals;
Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation approval of a
commercial entrance, if applicable;
6) Enrollment shall be limited by application of standards in this
staff report;
7)Hours of operation limited to 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. Days of operation limited
to Monday through Friday.
8) Staff would recommend that the applicant, both for the protection of the
children and the applicant, voluntarily comply with the Virginia
Department of Welfare's Minimum Standards for Licensed Child Care Centers.
Note: In development of the Zoning Ordinance, it was recognized that certain
limited commercial activities could be accommodated in residential areas without
adverse affects. Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance are currently under review
which would permit the care or instruction of five or fewer children as a
home occupation. (If conducted solely by the Moores, this could be established
by right after obtaining clearance from the Zoning Administrator.) Staff opinion
is that a small scale operation of this description would be in keeping with the
area and constraints of the site.
Mr. Tucker said the Planning Commission, at its meeting of May 4, 1982, recommended
denial of SP-82-15.
May 19, 1982 (Regular Night Meeting)
The publi'c hearing was opened. Mr. Thomas Moore, applicant, was present. Mr. Moore
said he was not aware of the nursery school requirements, such as space, until he was at
the Planning Commission meeting. Therefore, he had indicated willingness at that meeting
to decrease the number of students from twenty-five to sixteen. With that many students,
the criteria for air space can be met because 3200 square feet is required and he has 3900
square feet. Mr. Moore said he and his wife will be operating the school and there would
not be any need for the five off-street parking spaces because the driveway will be adequate
for their two vehicles. Therefore, Mr. Moore requested a waiver of the five off-street
parking spaces. The students will not be outdoors more than one hour a day and that will
usually be between 11:00 A.M. and 12:00 Noon. Therefore, he did not feel there would be
any problem with noise. Mr. Moore said no changes are proposed to the existing structure
so there will not be any visual changes to the residential character of the neighborhood.
Mr. Moore said the hours of operation are satisfactory but he would like to be allowed some
hours in the afternoon to work with the kindergarten students which would not involve any
outside activity. Mr. Moore said he is currently using space in a house at the corner of
Yorktown Drive and Meadowbrook Heights Road which is zoned R-1. However, the house is for
sale and this will be an interim facility until something more suitable can be found. Mr.
Moore said there are eighteen students in his existing school and he has operated the
school for two years.
Next to speak was Mrs. Jan Hacklethorn, resident across the street from the subject
property. She noted that the neighborhood is quiet and expressed concern that approval of
this petition could lead to other similar requests in the subject area. She said there are
two cul-de-sacs on Middlesex Drive which would be used for turning around and that would
create a problem with traffic. She was opposed to the petition.
With no one else present to speak for or against the petition, the public hearing was
closed.
Mrs. Cooke said she had once lived in a neighborhood with a day care school and she
could sympathize with the concern about traffic. The area she had lived in had a through
street and she could understand that having only two cul-de-sacs would be more of a problem.
Therefore, Mrs. Cooke said she could not support this petition. Miss Nash said the noise
of children to her is an enjoyment not a bother. Mrs. Cooke said it was not the noise that
concerned her but rather the traffic. Mrs. Cooke then offered motion to deny SP-82-15 as
recommended by the Planning Commission. Mr. Lindstrom seconded the motion. Mr. Fisher was
in agreement with Mrs. Cooke having experienced a similar situation. He did not feel day
care schools or similar activities were suitable in single-family areas with small lots and
agreed that this approval might create a precedent for other requests in the adjacent area.
Roll was called on-th~ m~tihn ~n~ sams da~ed~by-th~ ~ollowing recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Butler, Mrs. Cooke, Messrs. Fisher, Henley, Lindstrom, and Miss Nash.
NAYS: None.
1982:
Not Docketed: The following letter was received from the Electoral Board on May 19,
"In the Matter of Annexation and Revenue-Sharing Agreement Election.
This is to certify, that at a meeting of the Electoral Board of the
County of Albemarle held on May 19, 1982, on an examination of the
official records deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court it was ascertained and determined that at the election held on
May 18, 1982 the question: Shall the County of Albemarle be authorized
to enter into the proposed agreement dated February 17, 1982, between
the County and the City of Charlottesville for the sharing of present
and future tax revenues? Was passed with the following vote by the
Citizens of Albemarle County. Yes 5642 No 3330
Witness the following official signatures and the seal of the Board
this 19th day of May 1982.
(.~i.g~ed _~Y. Elizabeth Ann O. Haugh)
Chairman
(Si.grind .by John W. Burns)
Vice-Chairman
(.S_i. gned ~y Richard B. Florence)
Secretary"
Agenda Item No. 5. Set Tax Levy and Order Advertisement for a Revised 1982-83 Budget.
Mr. Agnor said since the referendum on the Annexation and Revenue Sharing Agreement
passed, it will be necessary to advertise a revised tax levy. He would recommend that a
public hearing be advertised for June 2, 1982, on a real estate tax levy of 775 per $100 of
assessed valuation. Also the budget be advertised to incorporate the revenue sharing
agreement as well as incorporating into the budget the inclusion of funds for the Youth
Services Center as recommended by the Board and the revised request from the School Board.
Motion to advertise the public hearing for June 2, 1982, as recommended by Mr. Agnor was
offered by Mr. Lindstrom, seconded by Miss Nash, and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Mr. Butler, Mrs. Cooke, Messrs. Fisher, Henley, Lindstrom, and Miss Nash.
NAYS: None.
May i9, 1982 (Regular Night Me,ting)
Agenda Item No. 6. Other Matters Not on the Agenda.
Mr. Agnor announced that the Federal Emergency Management Agency, working through the
Joint Emergency Services Coordinator's office, has begun a survey of commercial buildings
in the City and County for an inventory of buildings and facilities that could be used for
civil defense purposes.
Mrs. Cooke then nominated and offered motion to appoint Mrs. Marie Arthur to the'
Library Board of Directors with said term beginning July 1, 1982, and expiring June 30,
1986; said appointment replacing Mrs. Danielle Burch. Miss Nash seconded the motion and
same carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Butler, Mrs. Cooke, Messrs. Fisher, Henley, Lindstrom, and Miss Nash.
None.
Miss Nash then offered motion to appoint Mrs. Evelyn W.~ Turnbull to the Thomas Jefferson
Visitors Bureau for a term of office beginning immediately and with no specified expiration
date; said appointment to replace Mr. Charles Sublett, Jr. who has resigned. Mrs. Cooke
seconded the motion and same carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Butler, Mrs. Cooke, Messrs. Fisher, Henley, Lindstrom, and Miss Nash.
None.
Mr. Butler noted that Mrs. Betty Park had approached him concerning a musical compositior
called "Albemarle". She had requested that he present this to the Board as a possibility
for the County to use as a County song. No comments were offered.
Agenda Item No. 7. At 8:26 P.M., motion was offered by Mr. Lindstrom, seconded by
Mrs. Cooke, to adjourn to May 24, 1982, at 2:00 P.M. in Meeting Room 11, Fourth Floor,
County Office Building. Roll was called and the motion carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Butler, Mrs. Cooke, Messrs. Fisher, Henley, Lindstrom, and Miss Nash.
None.
CHAIR~YN
Z22
May 2q, 1982 (Adjourned from May 19, 1982)
An adjourned meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was
held on May 24, 1982, at 2:00 P.M. in the County Executive's Conference Room, Fourth Floor,
County Office Building, Charlottesville, Virginia; said meeting being adjourned from May 19, 19
Present: Mr. James R. Butler, Mrs. Patricia H. Cooke, Mr. Gerald E. Fisher, Mr. J. T.
Henley, Jr., Mr. C. Timothy Lindstrom and Miss Ellen V. Nash.
Ab sent: None.
Officers present:
Attorney.
Guy B. Agnor, Jr., County Executive and George R. St. John, County
The meeting was called to order at 2:07 P.M. by Mr. Fisher who said that this meeting
been scheduled some weeks ago at the conclusion of the negotiations with the City to
complete unfinished business concerning those negotiations. Since the Revenue Sharing
Agreement was approved by County voters in the referendum on May 18, 1982, it only leaves
signing of the Agreement by the City. He asked Mayor Buck if he had been authorized by City
Council to now sign the Agreement on behalf of the City. Mayor Buck replied yes and proceeded
to sign the copy which had been signed by Mr. Fisher in February, and also one additional
copy for the City's file. Mr. Fisher also signed the additional copy. Mr. Fisher said that
Section 5 of the Agreement requires the appointment of a committee to study consolidation
and he hopes those appointments will be made at the Board's June 9 meeting. The Mayor said
that City Council may make its appointments tonight.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 2:17 P.M.
Cha--irman