ACE Progress ReportGeneral De~
Mehring Property
698 (Hungrytown R(
Mill Mountain to C.
property is compose
bottoms and at the
Hardware River ocr
building, the steep
timber harvesting. 12
acre lots. Though'
easement would ex
running from Route
source of points in
common boundary
eliminate 9 usable
designated for "mour
Score: 41.96 points.
2. Jason K. Pollock Pre
Batesville, a small vi
parcels that together
the Mechum's River
land was probably
pine on many of the s
along portions of the
landowner is under p~
his primary source of
range in points). ThL,
for $180,000-185,00t2
this year, he will likel
has a true spirit of,
Though a large powe
would prevent any
views in a desirable
lots. The primary sc
would eliminate any~
derives some income
found only 2 miles do
Score: 24.70 - 27.53
3. Robert M. Byrom ProI
of SR 810 between
many large tracts
along SR 810 tO nearl
ription of Year 2001 ACE Applicants and Property
65.363 acres) - the Mehring property lies on the eastside of SR
,ad) where it precipitously rises to a high ridgeline that runs from
xstle Rock Mountain. Like much of the surrounding land, the
:t of densely wooded mountains with open pasture along creek
)ot of the mountains. The headwaters of the South Fork of the
xr on this property. While most of the openland is suitable for
nd mountainous terrain limit land-use to mostly recreation and
espite its large size, the property will support only 12 usable 21-
he property offers little development potential, a conservation
>and a contiguous area under easement to over 2,300 acres
29 to the top of Mill and Castle Rock Mountains. The primary
:he ranking criteria include: 1) the property has 6,455 feet of
Mth another parcel under easement; 2) an easement would
evelopment rights; 3) the property has 7,334 feet of ridgetop
taintop protection"; 4) the tract is very large.
~pertv (144.430 acres) - the Pollock property is contiguous to
llage in southern Albemarle County. It consists of several tax
:omprise a deeply undulating property with tots of frontage on
tnd access from both SR 636 and SR 692. Though most of the
en 30-40 years ago, it now consists of maturing stands of scrub
ideslopes and ridges. Only small areas around the homesite and
fertile Mechum's River bottomland remain open. Since the
essure to pay his monthly mortgage payments and cutting hay is
income, he currently has 42 acres of property for sale (hence the
particular tract has been divided into two 21-acre parcels listed
each. If he is unable to sell one or both of the 21 acre parcels
y place the entire 144.430 acre property under easement. Jason
:onservation and will to protect the land from development.
rline and a preponderance of steep sideslopes and bottomland
~tensive development of the property, breathtaking mountain
~ral setting (Batesville) make this tract very suitable for 21-acre
urce of points in the ranking criteria include: 1) an easement
~here from 9-11 usable development rights; 2) the landowner
fi:om the property - mostly hay; 3) the James spiny mussel was
emstream of property on Mechum's River.
~oints.
~erty (599.590 acres) - the Byrom property lies on the northside
frown's Cove and Boonesville, a remote area that consists of
nountainous timberland. It ranges in elevation from 910 feet
y 2,600 feet where it joins the Shenandoah National Park near
.¸
Little Flat Mountain
long road frontage)
land is steep and mo
SR 810). As a resul
opportunities. It doe
amount of acreage
common boundary
corridor that runs frc
have a genuine inte~
recreational opporm
include: 1) the prot
protection" and; 2) ti
Massie E. Hughes Pi
lies on the eastside o
consists of steeply r,
stream channels. Ti
grazed pastureland.
Castle Rock Mounta
land is too steep for
very rural and remote
the threat of develol~
criteria include: 1) ar
landowner derives in
road frontage on SR t
Gladys W. Clarke Pr~
SR 691 at the foot (
rolling terrain consisl
A single dwellings is
and large shade trees
the primary use of the
are several abandone
suitability for develol
views arid gently roll
mostly large orchards
the property. Hence
source of points in tl
usable development
operation and; 3) it ha
6. Millwood Land Trust
Cismont in the histori
farms and estates. It
"entrance corridors")
The property consists
Since much of the most accessible and developable land (with
was sold off to create four family subdivisions, the remaining
untainous with a narrow access point to a state road (242 feet on
:, it has limited use other than timber harvesting and recreational
s, however, have important scenic resources due to the extensive
above 1,200 feet on Little Flat Mountain. Furthermore, its
Mth the Shenandoah National Park would create a protected
m SR 810 to the top of the Blue Ridge Mountains. The Byroms
est in protecting this property and providing public hiking and
:tities. The primary source of points in the ranking criteria
.erty has 6,850 feet of ridgetop designated for "mountaintop
.e tract is very large. Score: 23.10 points.
'operty (118.820 acres) - the Hughes property, Perry Mill Farm,
[ SR 635 approximately 5 miles south of Batesville. The terrain
)lling foothills dissected by several perermia! and wet weather
e land contains a good balance of both matf~re hardwoods and
I'hough beautiful and unobstructed views' of the Blue Ridge and
in are possible from the south facing pastureland, most of the
intensive development. In addition, the property is located in a
~. area of Albemarle County (near the Nelson County line) where
ment is minimal. The primary source of points in the ranking
easement would eliminate 12 usable development rights; 2) the
:ome from the land - cattle farming and; 3) it has 2,584 feet of
;35. Score: 20,18 points
~perty (120.250 acres) - the Clarke property lies on both sides of
Df the Blue Ridge Mountains near Jarman's Gap. The gently
of mostly mature orchard land and some unimproved pasture.
located on the westside of SR 691, hidden behind tall boxwoods
Though producing income from a "pick your own" orchard is
: land, it is not intensively farmed and appears neglected. The~e
d buildings (including a trailer) on the property. While the
>ment on this tract is reasonably high because of the mountain
ing topography, the immediate area is rural and composed of
Furthermore, a large powerline runs along the western edge of
the threat of development does not seem great. The primary
e ranking criteria include: 1) an easement would eliminate 11
ghts; 2) the landowner derives income from the land - orchard
1,950 feet of road frontage on SR 691. Score: 19.53 points
Gildea Property (105.360 acres) - the Gildea property lies near
: Southwest Mountains District, an area composed of many £me
has long frontage on SR 783 and Routes 22 and 231 (both are
giving the property excellent access for future developmem.
of young pine plantations, thinned hardwood stands and some
pasture around the n
westside of Route 2
eastside of Route
Though long road fr(
estate properties cre~
by the proximity to
overhead powerline
it is contiguous to
corridors/Virginia by
Historic District and
Score: 19.28 points
From last year's pool of~
7. W. Brand McCaskill
foothills of the Blue
dissected by numero~
on SR 637 (Dick We
land consists of both
Ridge Mountain vier
owners have an ardm
have fenced out creel
actively use their lan
approved landfill for~
3) selling plants from
of points in the rankir
Road; 2) elimination
Rivanna River waters
lain house and barn. The neighborhood is very mixed - on the
2 are beautiful farms of the Keswick Hunt Country while the
2 contains many small lots with small, inexpensive homes.
.ntage, views of the Southwest Mountains and proximity to large
Iea real development threat, the property is negatively affected
aarginal neighborhoods, an extensive area of bottomland and an
The primary source of points in the ranking criteria include: 1)
~ther easements; 2) it has extensive frontage on two entrance
ways - Routes 22 and 231; 3) it lies in the Southwest Mountains
4) an easement would eliminate 7 usable development rights.
pplicants:
Property (167.602 acres) - the McCaskill property lies in the
Ridge Mountains where the terrain is gentle-steeply rolling and
ts streams and intermittent tributaries.. It has 'long road frontage
ods Road), a gravel road which was recer~tly hardsurfaced. The
pasture and a high-grade hardwood forest with tremendous Blue
rs. It is surrounded by other farms and open space: While the
Lt interest in conservation (they do not want the land developed,
:s from cattle and have signed up with the CREP Program), they
[ to produce income in a number of ways: 1) a temporary EPA
)rganic debris from upgrading SR 637; 2) raising nursery plants;
their greenhouse with plans for expansion. The primary source
.g criteria include: 1) 2,940 feet of road frontage on Dick Woods
of 14 usable development rights; and 3) it lies in the South
.~ed. Score: 22.48 points.
R~
Owner: Mehring ]
Property: Tax Map ~c
Ranking Criteria Dc
nking Evaluation Criteria & Points Determination
Criteria A. 1 6,4
Criteria A.2 56
Criteria B. 1 no
Criteria B.2 no
Criteria B.3 9 [
Criteria C. 1 7,3
Criteria C.2 yes
Criteria C.3 1,6
Criteria C.4 no
Criteria C.5 no
Criteria C.6 61.
Criteria C.7 no
Criteria C.8 no
Criteria C.9 no
Criteria C. 10 n/a
Criteria D. 1 no
Point Total
PEC = Piedmont Environmem
VOF = Virginia Outdoors Fot~
TNC = The Nature Conservam
DCR = Department of Conser~
CIS = Comprehensive Informa
SH = Scenic Highway; SR = S
CE = Conservation Easement
Family Partnership
7, Parcel 2lB (569.363 acres)
:termination
55 feet on CE
Z363 acres
R's eliminated
34 feet
30 feet on SH
~62 acres
Source for Points
PEC/plats
RE Assessor's Office
landowner
landowner
Zoning & Planning Departments
county overlay maps
landowner
County tax map
PEC & Monticello viewshed maps
DCR Division of Natural Heritage
CIS Program - RE Assessor's Office
County overlay maps
plats/surveys, County overlay maps
landowner
County Engineering Department
VOF, PEC, TNC etc.
Points
il Council
~dation
:y
ation and Recreation
tion Systems
:ate Road
12.91
11.39
0.00
0.00
4.50
7.33
3.00
1.60
0.00
0.00
1.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4 t.96 points
Mehring Family LP
TM 97, Parcel 2lB (565.363 acres)
SCALE IN FEET
Rankin
Owner:
Property:
(Batesville)
Jason K. i
TM 71, Pt
TM 85A,P
TM 85, Pa
TM 85, Pa
Total
Rankin~ Criteria De
Criteria A. 1 no
Criteria A.2 14,
Criteria B.I no
Criteria B.2 yes
Criteria B.3 11
Criteria C. 1 0 f~
Crkeria C.2 yes
Criteria C.3 1,4'
Criteria C.4 no
Criteria C.5 spit
Criteria C.6 94.
Criteria C.7 yes
Criteria C.8 no
Criteria C.9 no
Criteria C. 10 n/a
Evaluation Criteria & Points Determination
'ollock
:cel 26 ( 21.730 acres)
arcel 1 ( 23.990 acres)
:cel 21 ( 42.000 acres)
'cel 22B ( 56.710 acres)
(144.430 acres)
termination
..430 acres
DR's eliminated
et
feet on SR
Source for Points
PEC
RE Assessor's Office
landowner
landowner
Zoning & Planning Departments
county overlay maps
letter from landowner
landowner plats
PEC & Monticello viewshed maps
DCR Division of Natural Heritage
CIS Program - RE Assessor's Office
County overlay maps
plats/surveys, County overlay maps
landowner
County Engineering Department
Points
Criteria D. 1 no
Point Total
PEC = Piedmont Environment;
VOF = Virginia Outdoors Fora
TNC = The Nature Conservan¢
DCR = Department of Conserv
CIS = Comprehensive Informa
SH = Scenic Highway; SR = S1
VOF, PEC, TNC etc.
mussel
56 acres
0.00
2.89
0.00
3.00
5.50
0.00
5.00
1.25
0.00
5.00
Council
ation
Y
ation and Recreation
:ion Systems
ate Road; EC = Entrance Corridor
0.00
27.53 points
1.89
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Polloc~JasonK.
TM 71, Parcel 26
TM 85A, Parcel 1
TM 85, Parcel 21
TM 85, Parcel 22B
Total
21.730 acres)
23.990 acres)
42.000 acres)
56.710 acres)
(1:4.430 acres)
Owner:
Property:
(Batesville)
Ranking Criteria
Criteria A. 1
Criteria A.2
Criteria B. 1
Criteria B.2
Criteria B.3
Criteria C. 1
Criteria C.2
Criteria C.3
Criteria C.4
Criteria C.5
Criteria C.6
Criteria C.7
Criteria C.8
Criteria C.9
Criteria C. 10
Criteria D. t
Point Total
Rankin
Jason IC
TM 71, Pm
TM 85A, 1:
TM 85, Pm
Total
no
105
no
yes
9E
Evaluation Criteria & Points Determination
ollock -
cel 26 ( 21.730 acres)
arcel 1 ( 23.990 acres)
cel 22B ( 56.710 acres)
(102.430 acres)
termination
Source for Points
.430 acres
R's eliminated
PEC
RE Assessor's office
landowner
landowner
Zoning & Planning Departments
0 feet
yes
99t~ feet
no
sptr
70
yes
no
no
n/a
no
, mussel
cres
county overlay maps
letter from landowner
landowner plats
PEC & Monticello viewshed maps
DCR Division of Natural Heritage
CIS program - RE Assessor's Office
County overlay maps
plats/surveys, County overlay maps
landowner
County Engineering Department
VOF, PEC, TNC etc.
Points
0.00
minus O. 84points
0.00
3.00
minus 1.0 points
0.00
5.00
minus 0.50points
0.00
5.00
minus O. 49 points
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
minus 2.83 points
PEC = Piedmont Environment
VOF = Virginia Outdoors Fora
TNC = The Nature Conservanc
DCR = Department of Conser~
CIS = Comprehensive Informa
SH = Scenic Highway; SR = S1
Council
tation
Y
ation and Recreation
:ion Systems
ate Road; EC = Entrance Corridor
Owner:
Property:
(Bat~svill¢)
Ranking
Jason K.
TM 71, P;
TM 85A,P
TM 85, P~
TM 85, Pa~
Total
Ranking Criteria De
Criteria A. t no
Criteria A.2 12_'-
Criteria B. 1 no
Criteria B.2 yes
Criteria B.3 10.
Criteria C. 1 0 fe
Criteria C.2 yes
Criteria C.3 99C
Criteria C.4 no
Criteria C.5 spit
Criteria C.6 84
Criteria C.7 yes
Criteria C.8 no
Criteria C.9 no
Criteria C. 10 n/a
Criteria D. 1 no
Point Total
PEC = Piedmont Environmentz
VOF = Virginia Outdoors Four
TNC = The Nature Conservan~
DCR = Department of Conser~
CIS = Comprehensive Informal
SH = Scenic Highway; SR = St
Note: variation in the calculati
Evaluation Criteria & Points Determination
'ollock -
·cel 26 ( 21.730 acres)
trcel 1 ( 23.990 acres)
· cel 21 ( 21.000 acres)
'cel 22B ( 56.710 acres)
(123.430 acres)
termination
.430 acres
)R ' s eliminated
et
- 1,490 feet
y mussel
5lcres
Source for Points
PEC
RE Assessor's Office
landowner
landowner
Zoning & Planning Departments
county overlay maps
letter from landowner
landowner plats
PEC & Monticello viewshed maps
DCR Division of Natural Heritage
C!rS program - RE Assessor's Office
County overlay maps
plats/surveys, County overlay maps
landowner
County. Engineering Department
VOF, PEC, TNC etc.
Points
1 Council
dation
ation and Recreation
ion Systems
ate Road; EC = Entrance Corridor
)n of points depends on which 21 acre parcel is sold.
0.00
minus O. 43 points
0.00
3.00
minus O. 5 points
0.00
5.00
minus 0-0.5 points.
0.00
5.00
minus 0.22 points
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
minus l. 15-1.65 points
Rankin
Owner: Robert M
Property: Tax Map 6
Tax Map 6
Total
Ranking Criteria Dc
Criteria A. 1 501
Criteria A.2 59~
Criteria B. 1 no
Criteria B.2 no
Criteria B.3 0 E
Criteria C. 1 6,8
Criteria C.2 no
Criteria C.3 242
Criteria C.4 no
Criteria C.5 no
Criteria C.6 0.0~
Criteria C.7 yes
Criteria C.8 no
Criteria C.9 no
Criteria C. 10 n/a
Criteria D. 1 no
Point Total
PEC = Piedmont Environment~
VOF = Virginia Outdoors Fora
TNC = The Nature Conservanc
DCR = Department of Conserv
CIS = Comprehensive Informa
SH = Scenic Highway; SR = S1
SNP = Shenandoah National P~
Evaluation Criteria & Points Determination
gyI-oln
Parcel 16 (115.350 acres)
Parcel 28/29 (484.240 acres)
(599.590 acres)
termination
Source for Points
.55 feet on SNP
.590 acres
R's eliminated
i0 feet
feet on SR
0 acres
plat
RE Assessor's Office
landowner
landowner
Zoning & Planning Deparm~ents
county overlay maps
letter from landowner
landowner plats
PEC & Monticello viewshed maps
DCR Division of Natural Heritage
CIS Program - RE Assessor's Office
County overlay maps
plats/surveys, County overlay maps
landowner
County Engineering Department
VOF, PEC, TNC etc.
.1 Council
,dation
Y
ation and Recreation
:ion Systems
ate Road; EC = Entrance Corridor
wk
Poims
1.02
11.99
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.85
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.10 points
Byrom, Robert M.
TM 6, Parcel 16
TM 6, Parcel 29
Total
(115
(484
(599.
350 acres)
240 acres)
590 acres)
Ranking ]
Owner: W. Brand 34
Property: Tax Map 72,
Ranking Criteria Dete
Criteria A.I no
Criteria A.2 167..
Criteria B. 1 no
Criteria B.2 no
Criteria B.3 16 us
Criteria C.1 0 fee
Criteria C.2 yes
Criteria C.3 2,941
Criteria C.4 no
Criteria C.5 no
Criteria C.6 59.Z
Criteria C.7 yes
Criteria C.8 no
Criteria C.9 no
Criteria C. 10
Criteria D. 1 no
PointTotal
PEC = Piedmont Environmenta
VOF = Virginia Outdoors Foun
TNC = The Nature Conservanc'
DCR = Department of Conserw
CIS = Comprehensive Informat
SH = Scenic Highway; SR = St:
valuation Criteria & Points Determination
cCaskill
Parcel 51 (167.602 acres)
rmination
Source for Points
02 acres
able DR's
feet on SR
acres
[ivanna WS)
PEC
RE Assessor's Office
landowner
landowner
Zoning & Planning Departmems.
county overlay maps
letter from landowner
County tax map
PEC & Monticello viewshed maps
DCR Division of Natural Heritage
CIS program - RE Assessor's Office
County overlay maps
plats/surveys, County overlay maps
landowner
County Engineering Department
VOF, PEC, TNC etc.
Council
lation
!
Ltion and Recreation
.on Systems
rte Road; EC = Entrance Corridor
Points
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
5.00
2.94
0.00
0.00
1.19
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
22.48 points
McCaskill, W. Brand
TM 72, Parcel 51 (167.602 acres)
Ranking
Owner: Massie E. i
Property: Tax Map 8.
Tax Map 8.
Total
Ranking Criteria De
Criteria A. 1 no
Criteria A.2 11 ~
Criteria B. 1 no
Criteria B.2 no
Criteria B.3 12
Criteria C. 1 0 fi
Criteria C.2 yes
Criteria C.3 2,51
Criteria C.4 no
Criteria C.5 no
Criteria C.6 60.
Criteria C.7 yes
Criteria C.8 no
Criteria C.9 no
Criteria C. 10 n/a
Criteria D. 1 no
Point Total
PEC = Piedmont Environment~
VOF = Virginia Outdoors Fora
TNC = The Nature Conservanc
DCR = Department of Conserv
CIS = Comprehensive Informa
SH = Scenic Highway; SR = S1
Evaluation Criteria & Points Determination
~Iughes
Parcel 57 ( 29.200 acres)
Parcel 58 ( 89.620 acres)
(118.820 acres
Source for Points
termination
.820 acres
DR's eliminated
',4 feet on SR
PEC
RE Assessor's Office
landowner
landowner
Zoning & Planning Departments
county overlay maps
letter from landowner
landowner plats
PEC & Monticello viewshed maps
DCR Division of Natural Heritage
CIS Program- RE Assessor's Office
County overlay maps
plats/surveys, County overlay maps
landowner
County Engineering Department
VOF, PEC, TNC etc.
Points
,60 acres
1 Council
.dation
Y
ation and Recreation
ion Systems
ate Road; EC = Entrance Corridor
0.00
2.38
0.00
0.00
6.00
0.00
5.00
2.58
0.00
0.00
1.22
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
20.18 points
Hughes, MassieE.
TM 84, Parcel 57 (
TM 84, Parcel 58 (
Total (1
29.200 acres)
89.620 acres)
L8.820 acres)
Ranking
Owner:
Property:
Evaluation Criteria & Points Determination
Gladys W, Clarke
Tax Map 5 5, Parcel 7 (
Tax Map 5 , Parcel 1 lA (
Total
Ranking Criteria
Criteria A. 1 no
Criteria A.2 12(
Criteria B. 1 no
Criteria B.2 no
Criteria B.3 11
Criteria C. 1 0
Criteria C.2 yes
Criteria C.3 1,9:
Criteria C.4 no
Criteria C.5 no
Criteria C.6 83.:
Criteria C.7 yes
Criteria C.8 no
Criteria C.9 no
Criteria C. 10 n/a
Criteria D. 1 no
Point Total
PEC = Piedmont Environment
VOF = Virginia Outdoors Fora
TNC = The Nature Conservam
DCR = Department of Conser~
CIS = Comprehensive Informa
SH = Scenic Hi~tway; SR = S
54.700 acres)
65.550 acres)
(120.250 acres
termination
.250 acres
3R's eliminated
et
iO feet on SR
;44 acres
Source for Points
PEC
RE Assessor's Office
landowner
landowner
Zoning & Planning Departments
county overlay maps
letter from landowner
landowner plats
PEC & Monticello viewshed maps
DCR Division of Natural Heritage
CIS Program- RE Assessor's Office
County overlay maps
plats/surveys, County overlay maps
landowner
County Engineering Department
VOF, PEC, TNC etc.
1 Council
tdation
Y
ation and Recreation
:ion Systems
· ate Road; EC = Entrance Corridor
Points
0.00
2.41
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
5.00
1.95
0.00
19.53 points
0.00
0.00
1.67
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Source
Criteria A. 1 (parcel joins an ¢
Criteria A.2 (size of parcel) -
Criteria B. 1 (parcel threatene~
Criteria B.2 (parcel threatene~
Criteria B.3 (number of usabl
Departments. This calculatio~
Criteria C. 1 (mountaintop pre
Criteria C.2 (working family
Criteria C.3 (parcel joins a ¥
from plats/surveys (if availabl
Criteria C.4 (parcel contains
proof from landowner if regis
Criteria C.5 (parcel contains a
Criteria C.6 (parcel contains
County Real Estate Office. O
Criteria C.7 (parcel within dff
Criteria C.8 (parcel lies on st~
maps
for Points Determination of ACE Applicants
×isting easement etc.) - PEC, VOF, TNC, VDHR, County of Albemarle PRFA
Real Estate Assessor's Office
l with forced sale) - written proof from landowner, his attorney etc.
[ by economic hardship) - written proof from landowner, his attorney etc.
; development rights eliminated) - official determination by Zoning and Planning
~ assumes a loss of one DR due to an existing main residence.
tection) - county overlay maps
: rrm) - written proof from landowner, site visit, tax returns etc.
irginia scenic highway or byway, entrance corridor or public road) - determine
e), if not, then County tax maps (1 inch = 600 feet)
istoric resources or lies in primary Monticello viewshed) - see PEC maps, obtain
:ered structure and review Monticello viewshed maps
Natural Heritage listing) - contact Natural Heritage Division (DCR)
type III soils or better) - for properties under land-use, see CIS program from
:herwise, use dot grid with County soil survey
tking supply watersheds) - look at "Open Space Concept Map"
rte scenic river) - determine from plats/surveys (if available), if not, County tax
Criteria C.9 (parcel subiect
landowner or holder of easem,
Criteria C. 10 (parcel lies wit]
Engineering Department
Criteria D. 1 (parcel can be le
proof
PEC = Piedmont Enviroumem
VOF = Virginia Outdoors Fou
TNC = The Nature Conservan
DCR = Department of Conser
CIS = Comprehensive Inforrr
SH -- Scenic Highway; SR =
t ) permanent easement that establishes a riparian buffer) - written proof from
;nt
lin sensitive groundwater recharge area) - contact Dave Hirschman in County
veraged with funding from outside source) - contact landowner, obtain written
al Council
adation
:y
~ation and Recreation
.tion Systems
rate Road; EC = Entrance Corridor
Rankin
Owner:
Property:
Millwood i
Tax Map 6
Ranking Criteria
Criteria Ad 1
Criteria A.2
Criteria B. 1
Criteria B.2
Criteria B.3
Criteria C. 1
Criteria C.2
Criteria C.3
D
1,5
Evaluation Criteria & Points Determination
',and Trust (Gildea)
5, Parcel 86 (105.360 acres)
termination
39' on easements
105.360 acres
no
no
7 E R's eliminated
lies in SWHD
no
4,51 [2 feet on SR
1,1.8 feet on EC/SH
no
no
;26 acres
Criteria C.4
Criteria C.5
Criteria C.6 55.~
Criteria C.7 no
Criteria C.8 no
Criteria C.9 no
Criteria C. 10 n/a
Criteria D. 1 no
Point Total
PEC = Piedmont Environment~
VOF = Virginia Outdoors Fora
TNC = The Nature Conservam
DCR = Department of Conser~
CIS = Comprehensive Informa
SH = Scenic Highway; SR = S
Source for Points
PEC & plat
RE Assessor's Office
landowner
landowner
Zoning & Planning Departments
county overlay maps
letter from landowner
landowner plat
PEC & Monticello viewshed maps
DCR Division of Natural Heritage
CIS Program - RE Assessor's Office
County overlay maps
plats/surveys, County overlay maps
landowner
County Engineering Department
VOF, PEC, TNC etc.
d Council
tdation
Y
ation and Recreation
:ion Systems
ate Road; EC = Entrance Corridor
Points
3.18
2.11
0.00
0.00
3.50
3.00
0.00
6.38
0.00
0.00
1.t!
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.28 points
Millwodd Land Trust
TM 65, Parcel 86
(105. 360 acres
SCAt. r= IN FEET
k
SECTION 65