1979-05-23 ular Ni ht Meeting)
Mr. Fisher said the Board has received a letter for D. B. Hope, District Engineer,
Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, advising the Board of the public hearing
on the proposed location of the McIntire Road Extension to be held at Walker Middle School in
Charlottesville on June 27, 1979 at 7:30 P.M.
Mr. Fisher said he has not had an opportunity to meet with Colonel Washington of the
Planning Commission regarding the status report on the proposed Zoning Ordinance. He does
plan to meet with Colonel Washingbon in the near future. Mr. Lindstrom said he has reservatior
about the generalized map which is proposed by the Planning Commission to appear in the
newspaper. He feels a black and white newspaper print will not be very helpful. Mr. Dcrrier
said he agrees but~ also feels if the property owners can see the zoning classification placed
on their property, the Board would receive some public comments on the text.
Mr. Fisher said he has a copy of a letter dated May 7, 1979, to Mr. Ben Dick, Zoning
Administrator, from Susan J. Walker, a Soil and Water Conservation Specialist, Virginia Soil
and Water Conservation Commission, giving a review of local erosion and sedimentation control
programs.
Mr. Henley said a member of the Piedmont Baptist Church had called him to ask that a
representative from the Board meet with the Reverend Jones in front of the Courthouse on May
17, 1979 at 12 noon to receive a proclamation from the NAACP. Mr. Fisher said he had already
received a call from the Reverend Jones and Mr. Dorrier has agreed to represent the Board.
Mr. Agnor mentioned a letter from the Isaac Walton League announcing a meeting on May
31, 1979 and inviting local government officials. The meeting will provide information on
the Clean Water Act and related Federal environmental laws and how they influence land use
decision making in the State. The meeting runs from 9:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. with a charge of
$1o.oo.
Dr. Iachetta said the State Highway Safety Commission meeting will be held on May 24,
1979 at the Sheraton Inn in Charlottesville, starting at 9:00 A.M. Mr. John Hanna and his
staff will be present.
Mr. Lindstrom said he had spent the day with employees of the Albemarle Housing Improvemen
Program nailing sheetrock and feels that AHIP would like to have other Board members volunteer
their help.
Agenda Item No. 15. Dr. Iachetta moved at 9:45 P.M. to adjourn this meeting to May 23,
1979, at 1:30 P.M., in the Board Room. Mr. Dorrier seconded the motion and same carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
None.
May ~3,.. %97.~ .(Adjourned Day Meeting)
~irman
An adjourned meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was held
on May 23, 1979, at 1:30 P.M. in the Board Room of the County Office Building, Charlottesville
Virginia; said meeting being adjourned from May 16, 1979.
Present: Messrs. Llndsay G. Dorrier, Jr., (arrived at 1:40 P.M.)~, Gerald Eo Fisher,
J. T. Henley, Jr., F. Anthony Iachetta, C. Timothy Lindstrom and W. S. Roudabush.
Absent: None.
Officers Present:
County Attorney.
Mr. Guy B. Agnor, Jr., County Executive and Mr. George R. St. John,
Agenda Item No. 1.
Fisher.
The meeting was called to order at 1:35 P.M. by the Chairman, Mr.
Agenda Item No. 2. Discussion: Jefferson Area Board on Aging.
Mr. Agnor said he had been contacted by Mr. Jim E!more, Executive Director of JABA, to
have the Board cosponsor this annual meeting, which in previous years has been held on a
regional basis with very little participation. This year JABA is holding meetings in each
participating jurisdiction of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District in order to get more
comments from elderly citizens. Mr. Elmore was not at the meeting, but Mrs. Debbie Willis,
staff member of JABA, gave the background of services and activities of JABA.
Mrs. Willis noted some of the services and activities available to the senior citizens
of Albemarle County. Transportation for shopping, doctor appointments, and a nutrition
program are provided through JAUNT. Outreach service is provided for either home visits
or visits to the JABA office for help with problems. Community service days are held at the
nutrition sites so senior citizens can get help at one location for~different problems or
~~ ~viees. Para-legal services are provided for aid in Social Security questions and
.......... ~ ~~=] ~n mature. Home care
May 23, 1979 (Adjourned Meeting) (Adjourned from Ma 16, 1979)
service is provided for help doing light chores or for personal care for the temporarily
homebound senior citizen. Housing assistance is available to help elderly persons locate
low-cos~ housing. The nutrition program is a service that provides hot meals three times a
week. The Friendly Visiting program has many student volunteers who visit home bound citizens
The Z.D. program has issued cards to about 10,000 senior citizens and a large number of the
merchants in the area now give discounts to these card holders. There is now a full-time
retired person soliciting more merchants for participation. Recreational and volunteer
opportunities are provided through the Retired Senior Volunteer Program, but more volunteers
are needed.
Mrs. Willis then asked the senior citizens who were present for their ideas and comments
about the services and activities provided or for additional needed services· There were
about 25 senior citizens present. The concensus of the-comments was for more transportation
services and the need for more time to shop. Mrs. Brenda Arrington, staff member of JABA,
said JAUNT's cost per ride is already high and JAUNT cannot supply additional services without
adding more buses, which would increase the cost of the fare.
Mrs. Marcella Washington, senior citizen from Esmont, and Mrs. Beatrice Monroe, senior
citizen from Howardsville, would like to have at least two hours to shop· They agree that
one hour is not enough time to shop when most of the hour is spent waiting in the check out
line.
Mr. Fisher thanked Mrs. Willis, staff members of JABA, and the senior citizens for their
interest and concerns for the elderly. He said he has seen an increase in services and
activities designed with the elderly in mind over the past several years.
Mr. Lindstrom s~id he, as one member of the Board, would be very glad to give senior
citizens any help he could. Mr. Dorrier said he feels the nutrition program in Esmont is a
big improvement and has created a community spirit.
The Board recessed at 2:20 P.M. and reconvened at 2:28 P.M.
Agenda Item No. 3. Discussion: Lane Building Renovation Plans.
Mr. Agnor said the preliminary design work on the Lane Building is finished in terms of
the floor plan layouts and the approvals needed from the State for the Social Services Departm~
The project is ready for the final design stage but the cost is considerably higher than
originally estimated. Although the County has resources with which to finance this project
without incurring indebtedness, the project cannot be financed entirely from Federal Revenue
Sharing funds. There will have to be some funds taken from the General Fund. Public hearing
on the five-year capital improvement budget has been deferred until August in order to give
the school division more time to develop their cost estimates. This causes a problem in the
timing for the Lane project because inflationary costs are projected at one per cent per
month. There is also the problem of renewing leases for agencies presently in the building
and moving County offices out of rented properties.
Mr. Agnor distributed the following memo dated May 23, 1979, outlining differences in
costs of the project:
"Re: Lane Project Cost Estimates
The following summary of cost comparisons between the feasibility report
and the preliminary design estimates are provided to indicate the differences:
Site Work
The feasibility report estimated $15,000 for repaying the parking
lot and repairing existing sidewalks. The site plan design includes
the following new items:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Grading new parking area and west road
Relocating entrance off McIntire Road
Drainage improvements
Employees outdoor lunch area
Seeding, landscaping
Installing gas pump and tank
Erosion control
Paving, striping, walkways
Possible cuts
Total
Net
Demolition
$ 4,193
1,330
14,926
7,000
20,961
3,000
3~000
$ 54,410
36,529
$ 90,939
- 27,659
$ 63,250
Feasibility report estimated $7,400 for locker and ceiling tile
removal. Floor plan design includes the following new items:
East and west stairs
Existing partitions and equipment
Bearing wall penetrations
Window removal
Locker removal
Sub Total
Total
$ 3,475
9,7'60
7,50,0,
$ 20,735
16,150
8,000
$ 44,~5
Building Exterior
The feasibility and preliminary design reoo~t ~° ....
317
Window replacement
Cleaning and painting
Fire escape repairs
Elevator
Sub Total
Feasibilit~
234,000
34,296
1,800
47,000*
317,096'
Design Difference
$i~3',i50 ~
42,9i0 + 8,6i4
2,170 + 370
52,000** + 5,000
$230,230 - 36,866'
7.
8.
9.
New Items:
Remodel east and west stairs -0-
Drive-up window -0-
Basement areaway and hoist -0-
Mechanical equipment platform -C-
Third floor elevator lobby -0-
Sub Total
Total
$ 3'i7,096
20,650 + 20,650
3,000 + 3,000
21,090 + 21,090
22,102 + 22,102
13~200 + 13,~20q
$ 80,04~ + '80,042
$360,~7~ +$43,I75
* Shaft and Elevator
** Shaft only; elevator +$75,900 on building interior cost
Building Interior
The feasibility and preliminary design report compare as follows:
Feasibility Design
1. Partitions $ 60,000 $263,368
2. Replacement of doors 23,000 14,300
3. Toilet partitions 4,400 9,600
4. Corridor security doors 10,200 1,625
5. Carpentry 9,000 10,800
6. Flooring 42,697 98,350
7. Ceiling 40,445 69,000
8. Plaster Repairs 12,523 12,500
9. Painting 54,500 15,000
10. Repairs to Auditorium 20,000 24,000
11. Elevator Cage -0- 75,900
$ 2'76,7~5"' $594,442"
Possible cut - 19~000
~575,44B
Difference
'+$203,368
- 8,700
+ 5,200
- 8,575
+ 1,800
+ 55,653
+ 28,555
- 23
- 39,5OO
+ 4,000
+ 75~900
+$317,675
New Items:
12. Millwork Allowance -0- 50,000
13. Computer Area Allowance -0- 34,500
14. Furred walls -0- 134,271
15. East and West Stairs rework -0- 11,520
16. Venetian Blinds -0- 6,445
17. Miscellaneous -0- 29~566
Sub Total $ -0- $266,302
+ 50,000
+ 34,500
+ 134,271
+ 11,5'20
+ 6,445
+ 29~566
+$226,302
Grand-Total
$ 276,765
$860,745 +$583,980
Mechanical
The feasibility and preliminary design reveals the greatest difference
in this area:
Fire Suppression System
Heating, Air Conditioning,
Plumbing
$ 87,200*
435,000
$162,500'* +$ 75,300
i,327,433 + 892,433
Electrical
Sub Total
255~000
$ 777,2O0
602,076
$2,092,009
+ 347~076
+1,314,$09
New Items:
Emergency Power
Communications
Computer Area Fire Protection
Sub Total
* Enclosure of stairways
** Sprinkler System
-0-
31,250 + 31,250
75,000 '+ 75,000
18~750 + 18,.750
$125~000 +$125~000
Total
$ 777,200 $2,2'17,0'09.+$1,4139,1809
SUMMARY:
Demolition
Site Work
Building Exterior
Building Interior
Mechanical
Sub Total
Contractor Profit (8%)
Total Construction
Other Costs
$ 7,400
15;000
317,096
276,765
777,200
$1,'~'93,461
11~477
$~,'~04,'938
$ 44,885 + 37,485
90,939 + 75,939
360,$72 + 43, :~76
860,745 + 583,980
Included 111,477
Architect/Engineer Fee
Roof Repairs (incl. fees)
Contingency
$ 151,804
336,156
159,726
$278,381 + 126,577
350,367 + i4,211
308,785 + 149,059
200,000 + 200,000
3].8
Ma 23~ 1 7 Ad'ourned Meetin Adjourned from Ma 16 1
Mr. Fisher said this is a tremendous escalation in cost but the question before the
Board is whether to go ahead with this project or construct a new building. Dr. Iachetta
said he does not feel renovating is economical. That is why he was in favor of constructing
a new building.~ He felt the Board should decide now whether to put $5 or $6 million in
renovations or put it into a new building. Mr. Lindstrom agreed with Dr. Iachetta. Mr.
Roudabush said the original estimates were only broad estimates.
Mr. Agnor said in spite of the shock, he still feels the building will be more useful to
the County than a new building. Dr. Zachetta asked if anyone had estimated what a new building
..would cost in comparison to this new estimate. He feels that if there is a significant
difference, the Board should consider a new building; but if the difference is minimal, go
ahead with the renovations. Mr. Byron Sample of Stainback and Scribner said a rough estimate
for a new building of comparable square footage would be about $6,935,000. Mr. Dorrier did
not feel a new building could be built for any less than $6 million and did not fee! the
Board should change horses in the middle of the stream. Mr. Fisher then asked for Mr. Agnor's
recommendation.
Mr. Agnor said his recommendation is to go ahead with the project and have the final
design drawings made so the project can go to bid in the fall. Mr. Sample said the constructio
time is estimated at 10 or 11 months. Dr. Iachetta asked if the project went to bid in
November if construction could begin in January. Mr. Sample said yes, and also because a lot
of the work is indoors, construction would not be held up during bad weather. He said a new
building would take about eight months to put out to bid and about two years to construct.
Mr. Fisher asked that the Board go on record as having reviewed the cost estimate and
having heard the County Executive's recommendation. Mr. Dottier then offered motion that the
Board accept the County Executive's recommendation to continue with the work on the final
design drawings for renovations to the Lane Building. Mr. Roudabush seconded the motion and
same carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
Mr. Fisher asked that the Board members be apprised of any problems that may arise as
the work on this project progresses. He said he was caught totally unaware by this change in
cost. Mr. Agnor said he has known about the escalated cost for several weeks. He had sent
the estimate back to Mr. Sample for review because he felt there must be an error somewhere.
Then he had the County Engineer, Mr. Bailey, also make a review. Mr. Agnor noted that the
Social Services Department had to have State agency approval, which increased their office
space, but the State agency will also participate in the capital cost and will make refunds
to the County over a six-year period of time. The County will also charge Social Services
rent for their office space.
Agenda Item No. 4. DiscuSsion: JAUNT.
Mr. Agnor said the Transportation Committee (Dr. Iachetta, Mr. Lindstrom and Mr. Agnor),
met with Mr. Robert Tucker, Director of Planning, and Mr. Clarence McClure, Superintendent of
Schools, to again consider the request made to this Board by JAUNT. Mr. Agnor said the
Committee will present to the Board, at their June 6th meeting, two applications for grants
'from the State for projects dealing with mass transportation and ride-sharing. Dr. Iachetta
said the committee asked Mr. Lloyd Wilson, Executive Director of JAUNT, to study the several
aspects of the State grant program and advise the Committee which programs would allow the
County to maximize use of the grant money.
Agenda Item No. 5. Approval of Minutes: February 16, 1979.
Mr. Roudabush noted no corrections to the minutes and moved the approval of same. Dr.
Iachetta seconded the motion and same carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Dcrrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
Agenda Item No. 6a. Appointment: Sign Advisory Commission.
Dr. Iachetta nominated Mrs. Margaret Morton for one of the openings on the Sign Advisory
~ommission.
Mr. Fisher then read the following letter dated May 22, 1979, from Mr. Charles E.
Holliday:
"I am writing to advise you that Mr. W. F. Hall, Jr., representative from
the Lodging Association on the Sign Committee has advised me that he will
no longer be able to serve on that committee. Members of the Charlottesville/
Albemarle Lodging Association have asked that my name be substituted to
represent our Association."
Mr. Roudabush offered motion that Mr. Holliday's name be placed in nomination. Dr.
Iachetta seconded the motion.
d he had received a telephone call asking that Mrs. Jacquelyn N. Huckle
Mr. Fisher sai ........ ~ ~r~ on this Commission) Dr. Iachetta
· el Gleason ~wno is no monger ao~c u~ ...... '
replac~ Mrf.Mmc~aa o~n~ .... ~.~-~ Huckle to the Commission, which was seconded by M~. Dor~r.
il°ffe~ed, mg~m°~-t° -~--~ -^~ ~h~ Mrs. Margaret Morton, Mr. Charles E. Hollmmay ~n~ ~s.
±acnet~a~ ~ne~?~[~r~~2~ ~-~he Si~n A~visory Commission. Mr. Dorrier seconmem 5ne
!Jacquelyn ~. ~uc~±e ~ ~u~ ~
otion and the same carried by the following recorded vote:
-.- _-_ -_ _ 2 d'~ur d Meetin d'ourned from Ma 16 1
Agenda Item No. 6b. Appointments: Zoning Administrator and Deputy.
Mr. Agnor said Mr. J. Benjamin Dick, Zoning Administrator, has resigned effective May
31, 1979. He made the following recommendations: (1) Assign the responsibilities of a
zoning administrator as part of the job description for the Director of Inspections, Mr.
Robert Vaughn, with no change in classification or salary, range.' (2) Appoint as deputy
zoning administrator, Mr. Jessie R. Hurt, to handle the day-to-day responsibilities of administ r~:~
the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Hurt is a resident of Gordonsville, Virginia; has been in the Code
enforcement field for 18 years, is currently employed in Orange, Virginia, as building/
electrical/plumbing/zoning/soil erosion inspector. Prior to that time, he served 13 years in
the inspection field of the Highway Department. Mr. Agnor said he would bring recommended
revisions to the Pay/Classification Plan to the June meeting. Mr. Dorrier then offered
motion to appoint Mr. Robert Vaughn as Zoning Administrator and Mr. Jessie R. Hurt as Deputy
Zoning Administrator. Dr. Iachetta seconded the motion and same carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. 7. Other Ztems Not on Agenda.
Mr. Fisher noted receipt of a copy of the Virginia Department of Highways and Trans~ortati n
1979-1980 Tentative Allocations for Interstate, Primary and Urban Construction. He said the
County has been allocated $50,000 for preliminary engineering on Route 29 North. Also,
supplemental allocations have been granted for Route 20 North and South.
Mr. Fisher reminded the Board of the meeting set for May 24, 1979 at 10:00 A.M. at the
First Presbyterian Church to update the Economic Development plan for Planning District 10.
He said Albemarle County has not received any money because the County is at the bottom of
the list of priorities. He hopes that the localities which have received funding will go to
the bottom of the list so Albemarle County can move up on the list. He said he will not be
able to attend but hopes other Board.members will attend and take this position.
Mr. Fisher read the following letter from Mr. George W. Williams:
"April 17, 1979
Miss Lettie Neher, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
Charlottesville, Virginia
22901
Dear Miss Nehar:
_The Board of Directors of Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority is reviewing
alternatives for future water supply impoundments to serve the urban area
of Charlottesville and Albemarle County. One of the prime alternatives is
Buck Mountain Creek, as recommended by the Camp, Dresser and McKee (CDM)
Report. The conclusions and findings of the Watershed Management Committee,
as they relate to future impoundments, will also be of interest to 'the
Authority.
While no firm decisions can be made at this pOint, the Board of Directors
has requested that the Board of Supervisors be advised of the potential for
an impoundment on Buck Mountain Creek so this can be considered in the
deliberations of the proposed Zoning Ordinance.
Sincerely yours,
(Signed) George W. Williams
Executive Director"
Mr. Fisher requested that a copy of this letter be sent to the Planning Commission for
their consideration in the proposed new Zoning Ordinance and also to the Watershed Management
Committee for their information.
Mr. Fisher said he and Mr. Agnor met with Mayor Laurence Brunton and Mr. Cole Hendrix,
thereCity Manager, will be another for a first meeting discussion in a few on weeks, the Joint Economic Development Commission. He said
Mr. Fisher said he had received a copy of "The White House Statement, Rural Development
Initiatives: Energy for Rural America" which will be on file in the Clerk's Office of the
Board of Supervisors. '
Mr. Dorrier said he had been asked by Mr~. Fisher to accept the NAACP Proclamation for
the Board, which was presented by the Reverend Jones of Piedmont Baptist Church on May 17,
1979, and read the following:
3lO
Ma 23 1 Ad'ourned Meetin Ad'ourned from Ma 16~1~~ ~)
NAACP PROCLAMATION
May 17, 1979
WHEREAS, 25 years ago, May 17, 1954, the NAACP applauded the historic
United States Supreme Court victory ruling unconstitutional segregation in
public education, thus eliminating the separate but equal doctrine; and
WHEREAS, 25 years ago, following the decision declaring racial segregation
in public education inherently unequal, and therefore unconstitutional; and
of American school children in 1979
WHEREAS,
an
overwhelming
majority
attend racially segregated schools, which are almost without exception inferior
in quality to white schools that fail to prepare pupils for life in our
pluralistic society; and
WHEREAS, discrimination continues to plague people of color in the area
of equal access in employment, equality of opportunity in housing, employment
in higher education and in communications; and
WHEREAS, 25 years after Brown, American Black Citizens are still the last
hired and the first fired; still relegated to the lowest strata of the economic
totem pole; still fatally beaten at the whim of law enforcement officials;
still redlined out of neighborhoods by.practices and policies of major
lending institutions; and
WHEREAS, 25 years after Brown, Blacks are still the victims of racial
stereotypes and racial slurs in print and in the media, depicting them as
inferior beings, with no worth or dignity, and no character or morals; and
WHEREAS, 25 years after Brown, government at all levels are cutting back
on vitally needed services to the poor and those who have been victims of a
long night of racial oppression and bigotry at a time when a definitive
policy needs to be adopted to wipe poverty, ignorance and disease from our
midst;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the NAACP calls upon America to rise up
and to live out the meaning of her Creed, "We hold these truths to be self-
evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed with certain
inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness;
FURTHER, we call upon government to end the nightmare of officially
endorsed or condoned racism; to take the moral initiative and to resist
efforts to balance budgets on the backs of those who can least afford austerity.
We call upon the mayors of our cities, the governors of our states to make
affirmative action a meaningful component of their stated and unstated
policies.
This, we do in the name of one America."
Mr. Agnor said there was a road in Langford Subdivision, Section 1, Churchill Lane,
which is ready to be accepted into the State Secondary System. Dr. Iachetta then offered
motion to adopt the following resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED. by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
that the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation be and is hereby
requested to accept into the Secondary System of Highways, subject to final
inspection and approval by the Resident Highway Department, the following road
in Section I in Langford Subdivision:
Beginning at Station 10+10 of Churchill Lane, a point common
to the centerline of Churchill Lane and the edge of pavement
of Interstate 64 Frontage Road No. 1; thence with Churchill
Lane in a northwesterly direction 750 feet to Station 17+60,
the end of Churchill Lane in Section I of Langford.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Highways and Transporta-
tion be and is hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed right of way and drainage
easements along this requested addition as recorded by plat in the Office of the
Clerk of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 631, page 533 and
Deed Book 671, page 7.
Mr. Henley seconded the foregoing motion and same carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Dottier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
None.
Mr. Agnor read the following notice from Mrs. Sally Thomas:
"May 18, 1979
The City-County Cooperation Study Committee has invited a panel of guest
speakers to explore aspects of city-county cooperation with the members of
the committee and the members of the local governing bodies. This meeting
will be held on May 30, 1979, beginning at 7:30 P.M. at the Federal Executive
Institute on Emmett Street. We hope that all members of the Board of
Supervisors will join us for an interesting evenin~ of~disc~~
May 23, 1979 (Adjourned Meeting) (Adjourned from May 16, 1979)
At 3:45 at the request of the Chairman motion was offered by Mr. Roudabush to
adjourn into executive session for the purpose of discussing property acquisition.
motion was seconded by Dr. Iachetta, and carried by the following recorded vote:
The
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
None.
The Board reconvened into open session at 5:00 P.M. Mr. Henley then offered motion to
adjourn this meeting until May 30, 1979, at 7:30 P.M. at the Federal Executive Institute in
Charlottesville. Dr. Iachetta seconded the motion and same carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
None.
_ _ ~/.. Chairman
322
Agenda Item.No.
May 90, 1979 (Adjourned from May 23, 1979)
An adjourned meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was held
E '
on May 30, 1979, at 7:3G P.M., at the~Federal xecutz.ve In~fitute, Route 29 North,
Charlottesville, Virginia; said meeting being adjourned from May 23, 1979
Present: MeSsrs. Lindsay G. Dorrie_r, Jr., Gerald .~. Fibber, F. Anthony Iachetta,
C. Timothy Lindstrom and W. S. Roudabush.
Absent; Mr. J. T. Henley, J~r.
Officers present: County Executive, Guy B. Agnor,...J~, and County Attorney,
~George R. St. John.
Also present were. several~memhers of Charlottesville-City. Council, members of the
Joint CityfCounty COoperation,.Study committee, and a few citizens.
Agenda Item No. 1. The meeting was.~calledP to.. ordem at~ 7: 89 P.M. by the Chairman, Mr.
Fisher, ~who.announced~that this~meeting had been~requested by members ~of the Joint City/
County Gooperation Study. Committee. He then turned the meeting over to Mrs. Sally Thomas,
Chairman of the Cmmmittee.
Age,da ~tem No. 2. Panel Discussion: Joint City/County Study Committee.
Mrs..Thomas introduced the~ in~ited ~panelists who had come to discuss new annexation
legislation: Mr. Richard W. Hall~Sizemore, Legislative Researcher, Division of Legislative
Services, General Assembly; Mr. Bradley K. Hermes, Senior Staff Associate, Virginia Municipal
League; Nr. Jack D. Edwards, Membe~.,of~.the Board of Supervisors of James City County, former
President.~of the.Virginia.Association of Counties; and Dr. Leigh Grosenick, Pmofessor and
Chairman of Department of Public Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University.
The panelists.discussed va~ious~aspects,of .House Bill 5~9~9, House Bill 602 and House
Bill 803, all adopted by the General Assembly in 1@.7~ and all dealing with annexation.
At the end of ~the panel diseussion~, questions were taken from those persons present.
At 9:.43 ~.M., themeeting wa~ adjourned.