1978-01-04OZ2
January 4, 1978 (Adjourned from December 21, 1977)
An adjourned meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was
held on-January 4, 1978, beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the Albemarle County Courthouse,
Charlottesville, Virginia; said meeting being adjourned from December 21, 1977.
(NOTE: Letter was received from Shelby J. Marshall, Clerk of the Circuit Court of
Albemarle County, stating that the newly elected members of the Board of Supervisors had
been qualified according to law; said members being Gerald E. Fisher, F. Anthony Iachetta
and C. Timothy Lindstrom.)
PRESENT: Messrs. Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr., Gerald E. Fisher, J. T. Henley, Jr.,
F. Anthony Iachetta, C. Timothy Lindstrom and William S. Roudabush.
ABSENT: None.
OFFICERS PRESENT:
St. John.
County Executive, Guy B. Agnor, Jr. and County Attorney, George R.
Agenda Item No. 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 P.M. by the County
Executive acting as Chairman.
Agenda Item No. 2. Election of a Chairman. Dr. Iachetta nominated Mr. Fisher as
Chairman. Mr. Roudabush moved that the nominations be closed. The motion carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Dorrier, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
ABSTAINING: Mr. Fisher.
Motion was then offered by Dr. Iachetta to appoint Mr. Fisher by acclamation.
Dorrier made section and the motion carried by the following recorded vote:
Mr.
AYES: Messrs. Dorrier, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
ABSTAINING: Mr. Fisher.
Mr. Fisher then took the chair and thanked the Board for his appointment.
Agenda Item No. 3. Election of Vice-Chairman. Motion was offered by Mr. Dorrier to
appoint Mr. Henley. The motion was seconded by Dr. Iachetta and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
ABSTAINING: Mr. Henley.
Agenda Item No. 4. Set meeting times, dates and places for the calendar year 1978.
Motion was offered by Mr. Roudabush, seconded by Dr. Iachetta, to continue with the same
schedule of board meetings as that set for 1977. The motion was carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. 5. Rules of Procedure. Motion was offered by Dr. Iachetta, seconded
by Mr. Roudabush, to readopt the Board's Rules of Procedure as originally adopted for 1976
and set out on pages 63 through 65 of Minute Book 14, and amended on January 3, 1977, and
set out on pages 18 through 19 of Minute Book 15. The motion carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
Agenda Item No. 6. Public Hearing: An Ordinance to amend Section 2-1 of the Albemarle
County Code entitled "Number, Appointment, etc. of Members of School Board."
Mr. Fisher read the proposed ordinance into the record and then opened the public
hearing. Mrs. Judy Bauerle asked what would happen to the appointment of a school board
member if the supervisor appointing him chose to leave the Board or died. Mr. Fisher said
as he read the ordinance, the term of the school board member would no~ be affected. With
no one else from the public rising to speak for or against this proposed amendment, the
public hearing was closed. Motion was then offered by Dr. Iachetta to adopt the following
ordinance:
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, that Article I, Section 2-1 of the Albemarle County Code
be amended and reenacted to read as follows:
The school board of the county shall be compos, ed of seven trustees
appointed by the board of supervisors. One trustee shall be appointed
from each magisterial district and one trustee shall be appointed from
the county at large. Such trustees shall serve at the pleasure of the
board of supervisors, provided that absent any action to the contrary
by the supervisors, the term of th~ member at large shall expire on
December 31st of the second year of his appointment and the term of
each member appointed according to magisterial district shall be
coterminous with that of the supervisor placing his name in nomination.
Yacancies resulting from .resignation, death, or removal for cause shall
be 'filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
January 4,1978 (Adjourned from December 21, 1977)
January 4, 1978 (Regular-~Night Meeting)
023
The foregoing motion was seconded by Mr. Roudabush and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
None.
Not Docketed: Motion was offered by Dr. Iachetta, seconded by Mr. Roudabush, to
redesignate Lettie E. Neher as Clerk to the Board of Supervisors and Linda W. Leake as
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors for the calendar year 1978. The motion carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, Lindstrom and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. 7.
At 7:25 P.M., the meeting was adjourned.
-- -- ~i~man- --
Janaury 4, 1978 (Regular-Night Meeting)
A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was held
on January 4, 1978, beginning at 7:30 P.M. in the Albemarle County Courthouse, Charlottesville
Virginia.
PRESENT: Messrs. Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr., Gerald E. Fisher, J. T. Henley, Jr.,
F. Anthony Iachetta, C. Timothy Lindstrom and William S. Roudabush.
ABSENT: None.
OFFICERS PRESENT: County Executive, Guy B. Agnor, Jr.; County Attorney, George R.
St. John; and Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Planner.
Agenda Item No. 1.
Fisher.
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M. by the Chairman, Mr.
Agenda Item No. 2. Public Hearing: SP-77-78. Maclin Properties Ltd. Ptr. To
operate a swim club on about 4.35 acres zoned R-3. Property on northwest side of Peyton
Drive. County Tax Map 61W, Parcel 03-1, Charlottesville District. (Advertised in The
Daily Progress on December 21 and December 28, 1977.)
Mr. Tucker gave the staff's report:
Character of the Area
This area is developed in three adjacent apartment complexes (Westfield
Club, Tudor Court and Jefferson Towne), totalling 425 units. This existing
pool and clubhouse are located within Westfield Club Apartments. Another
poOl is located in Tudor Court Apartments and use of it is limited to Tudor
Court residents. (Westfield Club and Tudor Court are controlled by Maclin
Properties.)
Staff Comment
The applicant desires to operate the pool and clubhouse in the Westfield
Club Apartments on a membership basis in order to support the expense of a
full-time pool manager. Renters within Westfield Club would be automatic
members and other memberships would be available to residents of the area.
The swim club would be operated on a non-profit basis.
Recreational area requirements for this development under the R-3 zone
total 5,200 square feet. The pool and clubhouse occupy 16,800 square
feet and there is an additional 15,600 square feet undeveloped area in the
central court. Rental within this complex is restricted to adults, and
therefore, tot lots are unnecessary. Staff recommends approval of this
petition since the club approach will provide for maintenance and improve-
ment of this facility.
Mr. TuCker said that on December 13, 1977, by unanimous vote, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of SP-77-78 with the following conditions: "Membership shall be
limited to occupants of Westfield Club and not more than 100 off-premises memberships."
The public hearing was opened. Mr. Maclin said this facility has been operated for
five years. The apartment complex is an adult complex and there is no full-time manager
for the pool, therefore it had been difficult to supervise. For~ the owners to pay an
individual puts a burden on the investors, therefore, they had come up with the idea of
bringing in a minimum number of outsiders to help cover the costs of this manager. The
pool is operated as a non-profit organization. Dues would be paid to cover the cost of
the manager and the assistant manager. Mr. Fisher asked the number of off-premises
persons who would be using the pool. Mr. Maclin said they had not considered any specific
number feeling that they wanted only enough people to help pay the cost of this manager,
so when the Planning Commission asked this question, they had agreed to limit the membership
to 100, although~this could involve 200 persons if everyone brought a husband, wife, or
date.
With no one else from the public rising to speak, the public hearing was closed. Mr.
Tucker said he felt it was the Planning Commission's intention to limit the membership to