1977-01-19N19, 1977 (Regular-Night Meeting)
~:~ ~2~a0~~ ~ _
044
to accept cluster developments~f the~e developments are made attractive and economical!y~
feasible. Mr. ~o~r~er hoped the Board would direct the staff to come up with some type
of proposal and obtain information from other counties using clusters. He said this problem
needs to be addressed as quickly as possible.
~gen~a Ir~em,:~'.; ~,~,,i' Ap~o'~n~ment: Housing Coordinator. Mr. Jason Eckford, Chairman,
Housing Committee, recommended to the Board Mr. Peter Daley, a 1972 graduate of the
University of Virginia. He has a Bachelor of Arts with concentrations in government and
religion. He served from 1972 to 1976 as Executive Director of the Greene County Economic
Corporation and during that time participated in the development of the Greene County
Housing Authority. Presently, he serves as vice president of the Charlot~tesvilie Housing
Foundation and is a member of the Board of Directors of the Charlottesville Housing
Improvement Program. Mr. Agnor supported the recommendation made by Mr. Eckford and
asked for the Board's confirmation. At this time, motion was offered by Dr. Iachetta to
appoint Mr. Peter J. Daley as Housing Coordinator to be effective January 24, 1977.
Motion was seconded by Mrs. David and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Mr. Roudabush suggested that Mr. Daley be put in touch with the Steering Committee
for the Comprehensive Plan since low cost housing is part of the plan.
At 5:35 P.M., Mr. Fisher requested that the Board adjourn into executive session to
discuss personnel matters. Motion to this effect was offered by Mrs. David. Mr. Dorrier
seconded the motion and same carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
The Board reconvened at 7:35 P.M. and upon proper motion adjourned~the meeting which
had begun at 3:00 P.M.
January 19, 1977 (Regular - Night Meeting)
A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was held on
January 19, 1977, beginning at 7:30 P.M. in the Albemarle County Courthouse, Charlottesville,
Virginia.
Present: Mrs. Opal D. David and Messrs. L~ndsay G. Dorrier, Jr., Gerald E. Fisher,
J. T. Henley, Jr., F. Anthony Iachetta and William S. Roudabush.
Absent: None
Officers present: County Executive, Guy B. Agnor, Jr.; County Attorney, George R.
St. John; and County Planner, Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Agenda Item No. 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:41 P.M. Mr. Fisher announced
that he has received recommendations from the Chamber of Commerce, Coordination of Govern-
mental Services Committee. The committee was surprised that there are not as many problems
as they had amticipated, and recognized that the City and County governments are working
together at a level not realized by most of the general public. The committee has made
several recommendations: the Board should hold its meetings in City Council cham~ers so
there could be a vote of the members without roll call, board meetings could then he tele-~
vised and carried on Cable T.V., and other such proposals. Mr. Fisher asked that bopies of
the report be distributed to all Board members.
Agenda Item No. 2. ZTA-76-09. 0sborn L. Huff. Deferred from November 17, 1976.
Mr. Fisher said this petition had been deferred so Mr. Roudabush could check with the
property owners in the~area to get their comments on the rezoning of their properties from
RS-i to A-1.
Mr. Roudabu~h said he contacted all but two of the property owners and had received the
following answers
Parcels 29B and 31, Richard H. Jones. Mr. Jones and his wife are split 50/50
on the question. At this time they would not say definitely that they would
agree to any downzoning of their property,~'but would not object if their
neighbors requested same.
Parcel 30, Maxey Gentry wou~d not object to A-1.
Parcel 25A, Burruss Land and Lumber Company. This property has been divided
into tracts that comply with A-1 zoning; a mixture of lots ranging in size from
two to five acres. The land is no longer owned entirely by Burruss. A repre-
sentative of Burruss felt the Company would not object to A-1 zoning, and did
not feel the purchasers of lots would object to A-1.
045
January 19, 1977 (Regular - Night Meeting)
Parcel 26A, Frances C. Hubbard. Mr. Roudabush was unable to contact this owner.
Parcel 26, Moses Herring. Mr. Roudabush said he had talked with an agent repre-
senting Mr. Herring who felt that the A-1 designation would be the most useful
for the land because of percolation requirements for septic tanks.
Parcels 27A and 27B, James L. Perkins indicated he would not object to A-1.
Parcel 28A, Donald Cline could not be contacted.
Parcel 28, Walter F. Bishop did not object to A-1.
Parcel 16, Tax Map 95, Mr. & Mrs. James Winn do not object to A-1.
Parcel 16A, Tax Map 95, is owned by Mr. Osborn Huff, the applicant for this
petition.
Parcel 16B, Tax Map 95, Golden Tomlin. Mr. Roudabush said he was unable to
'contact Mr. Tomlin, but understands his property is on the market foR sale.
Mr. Tomlin evidently does not live in this area.
Mr. Roudabush said it appears that the majority of landowners in the area do not object
to having their property rezoned to A-1. There are several parcels of land that would be
involved in this rezoning which have been created since this tax map was made and he did
not contact any of those owners. Mr. Roudabush then offered motion to adopt the following
resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, does hereby state its intent to amend the Albemarle County
Zoning Map by rezoning the following parcels from RS-1 Residential to
A-1 Agricultural:
Tax Map 94, Parcels 29B, 31, 30, 25A, 26A, 26B, 26, 27B, 27A, 28A & 28
Tax Map 95, Parcels 16, 16A and 16B
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Albemarle County Planning Commission
is hereby directed to hold public hearings on this matter, with all
affected property owners being notified of these proceedings, and with a
recommendation being returned to the Board of Supervisors as soon as
possible.
The foregoing motion was seconded by Dr. Iachetta. Mrs. David asked if this action
will make any of the lots nonconforming. Mr. Roudabush said there are several lots which
have been taken out of Parcel 26; about one and one-half acres each, and these would
become nonconforming.
Mr. Fisher said the staff has advised the Board that much of this land would be
difficult to develop in one-acre lots because of percolation. Roll was called, and the
motion carried by the recorded Vote which follows:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda It.m No. 3. SP-86-76. Phil Sheridan. To expand a campground on 446.26 acres
zoned A-1 Agricultural to include recreational uses. Property on north side of Route 673
next to Mont Fair. County Tax Map 14, Parcels 7 &-8 and County Tax Map 26, parcels 33A &
33B. White Hall District. (Advertised in the Daily Progress on January 6 and January 13
1977.) ·
Mr. Tucker said this area is rural in nature; predominately in large parcels. The
Comprehensive Plan indicates conservation use for the area. Montfair ~Campgrounds currently
exists on about 129 acres (Tax Map 26, Parcels 33A and 33B). The applicant proposes to
expand into two additional tracts of 317 acres; Tax Map 14, Par6els 7 and 8. There are
currently 66 campsites, nine rental cottages, three bath houses, a recreation hall, and an
office/store. Both active and passive recreation are provided for in terms of bridle
paths, hiking trails, swimming and fishing lakes, a ball diamond, and tennis and basketball
courts. At this time, development of the proposed expansion would consist of ten rental
cottages and a six to eight acre lake. Ail facilities would be served by an existing well
and two storage tanks of a combined capacity of 32,000 gallons. The water supply is
reviewed periodically by the Health Department, Bureau of Tourist Establishment Sanitation.
Mr. Tucker said the Planning Commission, at its meeting on January 4, 1977, unanimously
recommended approved of this petition with the following conditions:
Site plan approval for proposed development to include County Engineer's
approval of the dam.
Septic tank and drainfields serving proposed rental cottages to be setback
a minimum of 200 feet from the proposed lake shoreline.
Future expansion of camping facilities or rental cottages will require
amendment of this special permit.
Board of Supervisors and County Engineer approval of central water supply.
Approval of appropriate state and local agencies.
Mr. Tucker said Mr. John H. Pratt, Dyke, Virginia, had written a letter objecting to
approval of this petition, but has since withdrawn that objection.
Mr. Sheridan was present. He said this facility began about 10 years ago when the
State and Federal governments were interested in getting farm people into the recreation
business. He was helped with the plan by the State Department of Recreation and F.H.A.
There will be minimal grading required for this expansion.
J~nuary 19, 1977 (Regular - Night Meeting)
O46
Mr. Fisher asked if the cottages to be built will be for short-term rental during the
summer or rented year-~un~ Mr. Sheridan said he rents to vacationers during the summer
and students in the winter.
At this time, the public hearing was opened'.
hearing was closed.
With no one ri~ing to speak, the public
Mr. Henley said this campground has been in operation for a number of years and he
has heard no complaints; in fact no one would know it is on this property~ He then offered
motion to approve SP-86-76 with the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission and
set out above. The motion was seconded by Dr. Iachetta and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS;
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. 4. Application for a central well permit for Phil Sheridan was
deleted because newly adopted ordinances and regulations do not require the issuance of a
special use permit for operation of a central well system.
Agenda Item No. 5. SP-93-76. Newell Welch. To provide for an accessory dwelling
accommodation in an existing antique shop on 4.06 acres zoned B,1 Business. Property on
U. S. Route 250 West about 1/2 mile east of Yancey Mills. County Tax Map 55B, Parcel 1,
White Hall District.
Mr. Tucker said this portion of Route 250 West is characterized by strip commercial
development. An antique shop exists on the subject property. To the north there is a
country store. To the east are single-family dwellings and a country store. To the south
are single-family dwellings. To the west is the Crozet Moose Lodge and two antique stores.
The applicant Proposes to Construct living quarters on the back of the existing antique
shop which he will occupy. The staff feels that the request is compatible to the commercial
use of the property. The Planning Commission recommends approval of SP-93-76 with the
following conditions:
1. Approval of appropriate state and local agencies.
2. Subject to variance from setback from Scenic Highway Ordinance being
obtained from the Board of Zoning Appeals.
Mr. Welch was present in support of the petition. He said he wants to ~live at the
shop to provide security and to eliminate the expense of driving to and from the store.
Mr. Henley said Mr. Welch has substantially improved the appearance ef the building.
He would not have voted for the Scenic Highway Ordinance if he thought variances could not
be granted for this kind of petition.
At this point, the public hearing was opened.
hearing was closed.
With no one rising to speak, the public
Mrs. David said she knew Mr. Welch had started this tortuous process back in May and
she then offered motion to approve SP-93-76 with the conditions recommended by the Planning
Commission. The motion was seconded by Dr. Iachetta and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher-, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush-.
None.
Mr. Fisher asked if the Planning Commission is considering amendments to the setback
requirements of the Scenic Highway Ordinance. Mr. Tucker said when this matter was brought
to the Planning Commission, the Zoning Administrator was not present; therefore no evidence
was readily available that any variances had been applied for or granted. The Commission
was reluctant to recommend an amendment until they had some concrete evidence that the
amendment is warranted. Mr. Fisher said he understands the Zoning Administrator may
recommend a change in the ordinance so that an addition can be added to the back of a
building without having to go through this process.
Agenda Item No. 6. SP-94-76. Winston Wood. To locate a two-family dwelling on 2.0
acres zoned A-1 Agricultural. Property at intersection of Routes 663 and 743 in Earlysvil!e.
County Tax Map 31, Parcel 5, Rivanna District. (Advertised in the Daily Progress on
January 6 and January 13, 1977.)
Mr. Tucker said the property to the west of this parcel is undeveloped. A country
store exists at the intersection of Routes 663 and 743. Other properties in the area are
developed in single-family homes. Earlysville is designated as a village cluster with a
Year 2000 population of 4,000 persons. In the past, the Planning Commission and the Board
of Supervisors policy toward two-family dwellings has been: 1) that they~be located in a
designated cluster, and 2) that the applicant occupy one uni't. Mr. Tucker said the staff
recommended approval of the petition with the following conditions:
1. Four off-street parking space be provided to serve the two-family
dwelling; and ~
2-. Approval of appropriate state and local agencies.
The Plannin Commission, on January 4, 1977, by unanimous vote, recommended denial
because during review of this petition, Mr. Wood said he would not be~ 0ccupYing one side
of the dwelling as he had originally stated. Also, although the ordinance states that a
two-familY dwelling can'be allowed by special permit on two acres, this application would
cause an increase in density in the A-1 zone. The Planning Commission did receive one
letter of objection from Mr. Dexter Goodwin who lives in North Carolina.
047
January 19,i~977 (Regutar-~- Night Meeting)
Mr. Roudabush said the plat attached to the staff report carries the name of his
firm. The plat was drawn for the Wood Estate and not the applicant, therefore he did not
see that there is a conflict of interest involved and would not abstain from the discussion.
Mr. Wood was present in support of the petition. He said his mother became ill and
someone had to be hired to stay with her. The family decided to have the property surveyed
and sold, but could not find a buyer. Since they had to sell quickly, he had bought the
lot with the idea of buitdin a two-family dwelling to offset the cost of the land. His
mother has since died, and he will not commit himself to moving into the house.
Mr. Fisher asked if there is another house on the property. Mr. Wood said his mother's
house is on the adjoining property and that house contains two apartments which are occupied
At this time, the public hearing was opened. With no one rising to speak, the public
hearing was closed. Mr. Fisher said this application is similar to another recent request
for a two-family dwelling on a lot too small for the number of dwelling units that would
be built. This is a two-acre lot so the request can be approved by the Board, however~he
feels it changes the residential density and the area and is in fact a rezoning of the
property. The property is zoned A-1 If Mr. Wood had four acres, he ~ould buitd~without
changing the total density. Mr. Fisher said he agrees with the Planning Commission's
recommendation for denial, particularly since the applicant is not sure he will reside on
the property and no hardship is claimed.
Mr. Dorrier asked why four acres is needed for a duplex. Mr. Fisher said the Zoning
Ordinance allows one dwelling unit on two acres in the A-1 zone whether the units are
clustered or staggered. Because of a quirk in the ordinance, the density can be increased
to one unit per acre under special permit procedures. Mr. Fisher felt approval of this
request would set a precedent and bring in other such requests for special permits instead
of rezoning applications.
Mr. Roudabush said Mr. Tucker told him that these applications have been approved in
the past. This land is in an area designated by the Comprehensive Plan as a village
cluster. He did not think it was right to deny this applicant under the same sort of
circumstances where other such applications have been approved. He assumed that there
will be one septic system and. one well and if they can serve one house, they can serve two
units. He did not feel the Board can control whether or not the applicant lives in the
dwelling.
Mr. Fisher said he has, in the past, voted to approve two-family units in the A-1
zone, but usually there was more acreage involved. Mr. Roudabush said this will be a
single structure. Mr. Henley said it is in the town of Earlysville. Mr. Fisher felt the
request should be for a rezoning or cluster development. He did not think the Board
should vote to change the density of residential areas by special permit unless there is a
true hardship condition. Mr. Roudabush said Mr. Fisher is saying that there is a mistake
in the wording of the Zoning Ordinance, but the existing Ordinance is all that the Board
has to work with at the present time. Mr. Fisher said the Board has full discretion to
either approve or not approve special permits.
Mr. Henley asked the size of the lots across the road from this prop.erty. Mr. Tucker
said they are about one acre lots. Mr. Henley said since the lots across the road are
one-acre lots and this property lies within a designated cluster, he will support the
request.
Mr. Roudabush said he could see an extenuating circumstance in this case. Even if
the applicant requested RS-l'zoning for this property, he could not divide this lot into
two lots and meet the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance for two dwellings. Mr.
Roudabush then offered motion to approve SP-94-76 with the conditions recommended by the
staff. H&s~.~btio~ Was based on the fact that this property is located within a designated
village cluster, and because of the irregular shape of the lot it could not be developed
into two one-acre lots. The motion was seconded by Mr. Dorrier.
Dr. Iachetta said there is an inconsistency because the single-family residences
across the road are on single tracts and this proposal calls for two families on a single
parcel. Messrs. Henley, Roudabush and Dottier all agreed that they would n~smpp~r~.-this
petition if it were not on property located in the Earlysville cluster and across the
road. from the one-acre parcels. The roll was called and the motion carried by the recorded
vote which follows:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Henley and Roudabush.
Mr. Fisher and Dr. Iachetta.
Agenda Item No. 7. SP-95-76. Robert L. Snow. To locate a private landing strip
(airport) on 6~.5 acres zoned A-1 Agricultural. ~Property located at south end of Route 623
on a private right of way. County Tax Map 106, Parcel 5B and Parcel 1 (part therof).
Rivanna & Scottsville Districts. (Advertised~in the Daily Progress on January 6 and January
1977.)
Mr. Tucker said this area is rural in character. Land cover varies from open pasture
to woodland. The closest major development is Woodse~dge Subdivision (39 lots) approximately
two miles from the site near Boyd Tavern. The applicant is preparing an area adjacent to
the R~vanna River for use as a private landing strip. Preparation entails establishment
of ground cover and marking of the strip. The landing strip is located in the flood plain
of the Rivanna River and is characterized by flat, sandy soils. Mr. Tucker said the staff
had recommended approval with the following conditions:
Certification by the applicant of registration with and approval
of the FAA and the Virginia Division of Aeronautics.
Immediate removal of debris and repair of landing strip following
flooding or other damage ~ince other aircraft may use the landing
strip in emergency situations.
Except in emergency situations, use of the landing strip shall be
restricted to the applicant, and restricted to one base aircraft.
-3,
January 19, 1977 (Regular-Night Meeting)
The landing strip shall not be paved and shall be grass only.
This application is subject to the regulations of Article 9A (General
Flood Plain District) of the Zoning Ordinance.
No structures or storage of gasoline accessory to this use shall be
permitted in the flood plain.
Mr. Tucker said the Planning Commission, on January 4, 1977, by unanimous vote, recomme~
approval of this petition, but had changed Condition #2 to read: "Except in emergency
situations, use of the landing strip shall be restricted to the applicant, and restricted to
no more than two base aircraft." The Commission also added Condition #7 to read: "Use of
airstrip by personal guests of applicant is permitted."
Mr. Snow was present in support of the petition. He said he uses the aircraft to pull
advertising banners during football games. It takes five or six minutes to take off and if
he uses the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport it ties up traffic. Ail approaches to this
strip will be over the flood plain. The closest neighbor is at least one mile away. He has
contacted six or seven of the neighbors and they have given their consent to this request.
He agreed with the recommendations of the staff, but did not want to see the permit limited
to just two base aircraft.
Mr. Fisher asked how many personal friends would be using this airfield. Mr. Snow said
he is a member of the North Carolina Air Club. It is possible that once every two or three
years there would be 20 planes landing in one day for a party. He did not think there would
be more than 50 uses a year by anyone other than himself.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
hearing was closed.
With no one rising to speak, the public
Mrs. David asked if Mr. Snow was also objecting to the stipulation that there be no
more than two base aircraft. Mr. Snow said he has friends who build airplanes and several
have approached him about using his facilities for construction.
At 8:55 P.M., the Board recessed and reconvened at 9:01 P.M.
Mr. Roudabush then offered motion to approve SP-95-76 with conditions #1 through #6 as
recommended by the Planning Commission, but changing Condition #7 to read: "Use of the air
strip by personal guests of the applicant is permitted provided that in the case of special
events involving more than five aircraft on the site at one time, the Zoning Administrator
shall be notified 10 days prior to such event, in writing, giving details of ~ctivity to
take place." The motion was seconded by Mrs. David. The motion carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. 8. ZMA-23-76. Henry J. & Patricia Price. To rezone 13.11 acres; 8.75
acres currently zoned B-i, 4.36 acres currently zoned R-3. Proposal is to provide for 10
acres to be zoned B-1 and 3.11 acres to be zoned R-3. Property on Route 29 North, north of
Better Living Furniture Store. County Tax Map 45, Parcel 68, Char!.ottesville District.
(Notice of this public hearing was advertised on January 6 and January 13, 1977.)
Mr. Roudabush said he was going to abstain from discussion and action on this petition
since his firm has for several years worked for Mr. Price on the potential use of this
property.
Mr. Tucker said the subject property is undeveloped and wooded.
vicinity are as follows:
Other land uses in the
North - undeveloped and wooded to Rivanna River
West - single-family residences
South -undeveloped, single-family, commercial (Better Living)
East - Carrsbrook Subdivision
The Comprehensive Plan indicates medium-density residential use (2.5 units/acre) for
this area. The applicant is requesting an increase of 1.25 acres of B-! zoned property and
a corresponding decrease of acreage zoned R-3 Residential. In addition, the applicant
requests a straight-line boundary between these zones rather than a physical feature such as
the stream which forms the existing zoning boundary. Neither B-1 Business nor R-3 Residentia
is compatible to the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan for this area. Staff opinion
i's that B-1 is less compatible than R-3 and therefore, the staff opposes any increase in B~i
zoning at this time. Furthermore, such action would set a precedent for future action of a
similar ngture. The staff is not opposed to the straight-line delineation between the two
zones, but only if the existing acreage in B-1 (8.75 acres) and R-3 (4.36 acres) is maintaine
Mr. Tucker said the Planning Commission, on January 4, 1977, by a vote of 7/2, reCommended
approval of this request. The Commission approved the request for a straight-line boundary
between these zones rather than a physical feature such as the stream which forms the
existing zoning boundary.
Present to represent Mr. Price were Mr. Ed Bain, Attorney; Mr. Cecil Keeling, Manager
of Jim Price Chevrolet; and Mr. Mike Boggs, who worked on the topo. Mr. Bain said Mr. Price
wants to move his business to this location because his present location on Route 250 East
is not large enough. At the present location he has about 7.65 acres, whereas this property
contains 8.75 acres currently zoned B-1. He is requesting another 1.25 acres of B-1 property
in order to allow for storage of vehicles. ~The request is not for any additional B'-i frontag
but simply g straight line delineation between zones which will leave over three acres of R-3
property on the SPCA road.
At this time, B~he public hearing was opened. With no one present to speak for or
~g~inst~this~request, the public hearing was closed.
January 19, 1977 (Regular-Night Meeting)
Mr. Fisher said the staff has recommended that the B-1 acreage not be increased. The
Planning Commission has recommended that the B-1 acreage be increased by 1.25 acres with a
similar decrease in the R-3 zoning. If the Board wants to follow the recommendations in
the Comprehensive Plan, the total acreage should be rezoned to R-2. Mr. Dorrier asked if
Mr. Price could not use the presently zoned B-1 land for his operation without making this
change. Mr. Bain said the total parcel is not useable because of the topography of the
land and a stream which flows through same.
Dr. Iachetta said the zoning on Route 29 North is a disaster now. Although he sympathi
with Mr. Price, approval of this request might set a precedent and he would rather see the
property downzoned. However, since the Board cannot do that, he offered motion to accept
the Staff's recommendation to maintain the present 8.75 acres in B-1 zoning and ~.36 acres
in R-3 zoning, but to allow the line to be adjusted and straightened. Mr. Henley said he
had no problems in allowing an increase in B-1 zoning of 1.25 acres and he would support the
applicant's request. The motion died for lack of a second.
Mr. Henley then offered motion to approve ZMA-23-76 as recommended by the Planning
Commission. The motion was seconded by Mr. Dorrier. He asked who would make the straight
line determination. Mr. Tucker said that has already been done. Mr. St. John asked that
the map be identified and made a part of the record of this meeting.
Mr. Fisher said he would not support the motion. He has tried for a long time to do
something about the strip zoning on Route 29 North~.a~d the creation of additional commercial
property on Route 29 North is against the recommendations in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr.
Dorrier felt that a one and one-quarter acre change is a small adjustment to make a business
successful. Unless the Board votes to downzone everything on Route 29 North, he could not
support making Mr. Price the scapegoat for the Board's dissatisfaction over the way Route
29 North has developed.
Mrs. David said the Board must exercise reason in such matters. The zoning on this
land will be no deeper than on lands to the south and ~his seems a small item on which to
hang a precedent. She was inclined to support the motion. The roll was called at this time
and the motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier and Henley.
NAYS: Messrs. Fisher and Iachetta.
ABSTAINING: Mr. Roudabush.
(Note: Map on file in the Clerk's Office is called "Rezo~ing Map for Jim Price
Property located on u.s~ Route 29 North of Charlottesville, Albemarle County, Virginia,
William S. Roudabush, Inc., July 8, 1976, with Proposed Zoning Line marked in blue~" The
map was initialed by RWT, 1/19/77, and marked "Boundary line approved by Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors on 1-19-77. This lines establishes the boundary between 10 acres of
B-1 and 3.11 acres of R-3 under ZMA-23-76.")
Agenda Item 9. Amend Section 17-5-19 of the Zoning Ordinance to provide for sidewalks,
curb and gutter. (Deferred from November 3, 1976.)
~genda Item No. 10. Amend Section 18'39 of the Subdivision Ordinance to provide for
sidewalks, curb and gutter. (Deferred from November 3, 1976.)
Mr. Roudabush said the committee which was formed to study these amendments has met
only one time. He recommended that the public hearing on these two items be deferred until
March 2 and offered motion to this effect. The motion was seconded by Mrs. David and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. 11. Appointment: Industrial Development Authority. Mrs. David
recommended Mr. Frank McCulloch as the seventh member of the Authority Board and offered
motion to make this appointment. The motion was seconded by Dr. Iachetta and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
In accordance with Virginia Code Section 15.1-1377, terms were established for the
appointed members of the Authority Board;~this being accomplished by random drawing of names
and terms. Mrs. Norma Diehl, three-year term; Messrs. Raymond L. Bell, one-year term;
Donald A. Holden, two-year term; William Douglas White, three-year term; Homer M. Sandridge,
four-year term; Preston E. Morris, one-year term; and Frank W. McCulloch, two-year term.
The Clerk was instructed to inform the members of the Authority of their respective terms
and to invite them to the meeting on February 9.
Agenda Item No. 12. Resolution: To accept road off of Route 698 into the
State Secondary System. Mr. Agnor noted that this road was recommended for acceptance into
the State Secondary System by the Road Viewers. The Highway Department has now completed
work. on upgrading the road and a resolution requesting acceptance is needed. Motion was
then offered by Mr. Roudabush,~ seconded by Dr. Iachetta, and carried by the following
recorded vote, to adopt the following resolution:
AYES: Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, that the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation
be and is hereby requested to accept into the Secondary System of
Highways, subject to final inspection and approval by the Resident
Highway Department, the following road:
January 19, 1977 (Regular-Night Meeting)
Road off of Route 698 extending approximately 200 feet
to the northwest, per road viewers report dated
September 23, 1976.
BE ZT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia Department of Highways
and Transportation be and is hereby guaranteed a 50-foot unobstructed
right of way and drainage easements along this requested addition as
recorded by plat in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of
Albemarle County in Deed Book 608, page 514.
Agenda Item No. 13. Lottery ~ermit: Post Conviction Assistance Project. Motion was
offered by Dr. Iachetta, seconded by Mrs. David, to issue this lottery permit for the
calendar year 1977 in accordance with the Board's adopted rules for issuance of such permits.
The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. 14. Lottery Permit: Stony Point VOlunteer Fire Company. Motion was
offered by Mr. Roudabush, seconded by Dr. Iachetta, to issue this lottery permit for the
calendar year 1977 in accordance with the Board's adopted rules for issuance of such permits.
The motion carried by the folloWing recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. 15.
received as information.
Report of the County Executive for the month of December 1976 was
Not Docketed. Mr. Fisher said there will be a meeting of the Human Resources Assembly
on Monday, January 24, from 8:30 A.M. until 1:00 P.M. and a training session for Board
members on that same date from 7:00 P.M.~ until 9:00 P.M.
Mr. Fisher said a tour of the new Western Albemarle High School has been scheduled for
Tuesday, January 25.
Mr. Fisher requested that site plans recently approved by the Planning Commission for
Bill Edwards Oldsmobile and Albemarle Bank and Trust Company be brought to the Board for
review at the February 9th meeting.
Mr. Agnor said there would be a meeting sponsored by the Extension Service and the Farm
Bureau on February 21 and February 22 at the Ramada Inn to discuss the farm bill that
Congress will vote on in the near future.
Mr. Agnor said he attended a two-day conference in Williamsburn last week conducted by
V.P.I. on personnel management.
Mr. Roudabush said the Sign Committee is meeting regularly and both sides are beginning
to come to an agreement. Recently, a whole section of the BOCA Code was discovered that may
be contradictory to the County's Sign Ordinance. Also the Highway Department has a booklet
on outdoor sign advertising. Ail of these items are being put into one package to see which
laws the County has to obey before a decision is made on what the County should adopt as its
regulations.
Mr. Dorrier said the Solid Waste Committee will meet at 1:00 P.M. on Monday, Janaury 24
in the County Engineer's Office.
Dr. Iachetta said the Resource Recovery Study Commission will meet next Monday to
decide which o~ the proposals submitted will be pursued.
Mr. Fisher said the Betz people had indicated that the Reservoir Report would be ready
in January. Mr. Agnor said no date has been given at this time. Draft copies of the report
will be distributed to this Board and City Council at the same time as the Advisory Committee
receives theirs.
051.
January 19, 1977 (Regular-Night Meeting)]:~
Claims against the County for the month of January, 1977, were examined, allowed and
certified to the Director of Finance for payment and charged against the following funds:
General Fund
School Fund
Cafeteria Fund
Textbook Rental Fund
Joint Security Complex Fund
Federal Revenue Sharing Fund
General Operating-Capital Outlay Fund
School Construction-Capital Outlay Fund
Commonwealth of Virginia-Current Credit Account
Town of Scottsville-l% Local Sales Tax
Total
$ 442,903.31
1,852,795.70
41,257.78
996.13
47,921.63
16',433.00
25,000.00
6,988.22
16,196.69
94.13
$2,450,586.59
Agenda Item No. 16. At 9:55 P.M., upon motion by Dr. Iachetta, seconded by Mr.
Roudabush, the meeting was adjourned. The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
NAYS: ..None.
L~hairman