1976-03-10NO88
March 3, 1976 (Adjourned from February 25, 1976)
March 10, 1976 (Adjourned from March 3, 1976)
March 10~ 1976 (Regular ~ight Meeting)
Dr. Iachetta asked ab. out a suit entitled '~Sullivan Mechanical Contractors~ Inc. -v.
Albemarle County School Board." Mr. St. John said that case is pending, but he does not
believe there has been any liability on the part of the School Board or the general contracto~
Graves Construction. (Matter pending on Western Albemarle High School)
At 10:50 P.M., motion was offered by Dr. Iachetta, seconded by Mr. Dorrier, to adjourn
this meeting until 2:00 P.M. on March~10, 1976, in th~ County Executive's Conference Room.
The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Chair~n
March 10, 1976 (Afternoon) Adjourned from March 3, 19'
An adjourned meeting of the Board of~Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was held
on March 10, 1976, at 2:00 P.M. in the County Executive's Conference Room, County Office
Building, Charlottesville, Virginia; said meeting being adjourned from March 10, 1976.
Present: Mrs. Opal D. David and Messrs. Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr., Gerald E. Fisher,
J. T. Henley, Jr. and W. S. Roudabush.
Absent: Dr. F. Anthony Iachetta.
Officers present: County Executive, J. Harvey Bailey; Assistant to the County Executive
Robert P. Sampson; and County Attorney, George R. St. John.
A work session for the 1976-77 County Budget on the fol~owing items was conducted
during this meeting:
Code 0 - Refunds (Ray Jones)
Code 3A - Director of Finance (Ray Jones )
Code iA - Board of Supervisors (Lettie Neher)
Code lB - County Executive's Office (Robert Sampson)
Code 2A - Assessment of Real Property (William Bradshaw)
Code IH - County Attorney (George R. St. John)
Code iF - Personnel (Robert Sampson)
Code 10L - Parks and Recreation (Robert Sampson)
(Note) Mr. Dorrier left the meeting at 4:15 P. M.
At 5:05 P.M. the meeting was adjourned.
Chai~an
March ~0, 1976 (Regular Night Meeting)
A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was held
on March 10, 1~6, at 7:30 P.M. in the Albemarle County Courthouse, Charlottesville,
Virginia.
Present: Mrs. Opal D. David and Messrs. Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr.,, Gerald E. Fisher,
J. T. Henley, F. Anthony Iachetta and W. S. Roudabush.
Ab s~nt: None.
0ffic~rs present: ~ounty Executive, J. Harvey Bailey; County Attorney, Goerge R.
St. John; and County Planner, Robert Tucker.
The meshing was called to order by the Chairman, Mr. Fisher.
Agenda Item No. 1. Public Hearing: To amend and reenact Section 4-13.1, Chapter 4,
Article ii of the Albemarle County Code by the addition of Queen Charlotte Subdivision as
one of those areas Wher~ dogs are prohibited from running at large. (Notice of this public
hearing was advertised in the Daily Progress on February 27 and March ~, 1976.)
Mr. Bailey presented a petition containi~g4~5as~gnatures of residen~ of the Queen
Charlotte Subdivision who are in favor of adoDti~g this ordinance for their subdivision.
Mr. Bailey noted that no counter petition had been presented to the Board.
Mr. Fisher opened the public hearing, and the first citizen to speak was Mrs. Lucille
Asher, who stated that she and~her daughter collected the'signatures on the petition
present, and only about ~0 residents refused to sign. She further stated that she canvassed
the entire subdivision, and only the Frederick Circle area opposed adoption of the ordinance
for Queen' Charlotte~Subdivision.
No one else from the public wished to speak either for or against this p~tition. Motioz
was then offered by Dr.(Iachetta, seconded by Mrs. David to adopt the following ordinance:
March 10, 1976 (Regular Night Meeting)
O89
AYES:
NAYS:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND READOPTING SECTION 4-13-1, CHA~TER 4,
ARTICLE II OF THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE (DOGS RUNNING AT LARGE)
BY THE ADDITION~;~OF QUEEN CHARLOTTE SUBDIVISION AS ONE OF THOSE
AREAS DESIGNATED WHERE DOGS ARE PROHIBITED FROM RUNNING AT LARGE.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
that Article II, Chapter~4, Section 4-13-1 of the Albemarle
County Code is amended and readopted by adding Area No. 15
described as follows:
Area No. 15. Queen Charlotte Subdivision as platted and
put to record in the office of the clerk of the circuit court
of the county in deed book 395, page 6.
Roll was called and the motion carried by the following recorded vote:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley,lIachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda ~t~em No. 2. Public Hearing: SP-543. Halsey K. Scott (Deferred from February 25
1976). Mr. Bailey presented to the Board the following letter:
"February 27, 1976.
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Charlottesville, Virginia
Dear Sirs:
I formally request withdrawal without prejudice of SP-543, Halsey
K. Scott. Th~nk you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
(Signed) Halsey K. Scott"
Motion was offered by Mr. Roudabush, seconded by Dr. Iachetta to allow withdrawal of
SP-543 without prejudice. There was no further discussion~and the motion carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
NAYS: None. ~
Agenda'ITem No. 3. Ray Marshall: Request for right-of-way over Sanitary Landfill #2
at Keene. Mr. Bailey said Mr. Marshall is the owner of Parcel 56 on Section 121 of the
County Tax Map. This parcel adjoins that of Carlton A. and Nancy W. Luck and it has the
same means of ingress and egress. The Lucks were given a key to the landfill gate. However,
a number of properties were served by this road in former times. Mr. Bowling of the County
Attorney's Office~d~e~nmt~thimk the County should continue to give out keys. Mr. Bowling
ha~ stated that the County should acknowledge the one time existence of a public right of way
over the landfill site and the absence of any formal abandor_ment of same.
Mr. Bailey said the ~unty has two choices: 1) to claim the manifest abandonment of
the right of way as evidenced in the use of the right of way for landfill purposes; or 2)
the County may acknowledge the existence of the public right of way, fence it off to protect
~he landfill and install a gate as may be conv~mient for the use of the landfill. Those
who claim rights in the old road would use it and maintain it as they see fit.
Mr. Marshall said he wetrld--~ ~~-y the land, he also did not feel a key is the best
solution to the problem. When asked if he would participate in the cost of moving the
gate an~ fence at the entrance to the landfill, Mr. Marshall said he is not the only
landowner ~ffected by lack of access. 'Mr. St. John said his office could find no evidence
that this old right of way through the ~a~dfill was a county or State Secondary road in
the past and if any landowner wishes to gain an absolute right of way over the landfill
property, they should hire their own attorney to search the records to determine and prove
whether or not~this was a private or a county road.
After considerable discussion as to the actual age and status of the road, Mr. Fisher
noted that if the road actually is a public right of way, then opening it back up to the
public could cause a considerable increase in traffic through ~he landfill. Mr. Henley felt
~lamd behin~ the landfill is landlocked because of lack of service of this road, then the
road should be reopened to the public. Mr. St. John~$9~~ if permanent right of way
is ever granted, that it be placed in the Boar~'~i~m!~m~e~_~hat this road is not sufficient
in width to support a subdivision~i~ compliance with the present Ordinance.
After discussion as to the type of fencing that should be required, and the possible
new location of landfill facilities, Mr. Fisher suggested this request be deferred to
March 18. Motion was then~off~red by Mr. Roudabush, seconded by Mr. Dorrier, to defer
this matter to March '~at the County Executive/~s~%~"~ith the County Attorney's Offi
and make a more complete report of recommendations to the Board at that time. Roll was then
called and motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. 4. Site Plan:
the following staff report:
Lucky "7" Food St:ores-Four Seasons.
Mr. Tucker read
"This request is to add gas pumps outside of the Lucky "7" Store at Four Seasons.
The pumps are to be located in the existin~ oaved area. The master olan for
March 10, 1976 (Regular Night Meeting)
The entire area has been treated as a general commercial area. The Planning
Commission deferred this'matter several times in order to obtain a revised
plan of the parking area for the market to show how circulation through the
pump island would affect the existing parking spaces and how stacking space
for three c~rS in each direction would affect the through traffic driveway.
On January 20, 1976, the Planning Commission approved the site plan subject
to the following conditions:
Fire Marshal approval.
Islands with landscaping to be installed as shown on site plan
and on the rendering which was presented at that meeting, with
the ypproval of the Planning Staff. (Two islands adjacent pumps
and on adjacent spaces numbered 23 and 15.)
~11 parking spaces to be marked with white lines on site.
Concrete slab under pumps.
On January 29, 197~, a letter was received from Messrs. Frederick L. Russell and
David~A~ Gaylord reques~hat the Board of Supervisors review this plan pursuant to
Section 17-7-6 of the Albemarle County Zoning O~dinance ~ecause they feel
the applicant should seek an amendment to the original site plan for the
Four Seasons PUD.~
Mr. Tucker added that the staff feels this is a commercial use allowed by right in the
present Zoning O~dinance and that no amendment is required to the or~±mal special use permit
Dr. Iachetta a~ked if declaring an area ~ommercial on a PUD plan automatically made that
area B-1. Mr. Tucker said this~has been the interpretation in the past and that control is
maintained over the site plan.
Mr. Dorrier stated that'his law firm represents Mr. Daley Craig and Four-Seasons ~d
he wished to abst~in~fr~m~dis~u~sion.~ ..~
Mr. St. John read Section~247~4 of the Zoning Ordinance and said that after the
site plan had been.approved under this section, no modifications to the final site plan
could be made unless an~amended final plan were submitted. He added that by having the
area designated as a PUD, itggave the right to have any type of commercial use allowed in
a B-1 zone; and once approved in?the site ptan by the Board, no change could be made
without additional Beard approval.
Mr. Russell, an adjacent property owner, said he does not feel this site plan is in the
best interest of the neighborhood's safety, health and welfare.
Mr. Roudabush, at this point, said that he represented Mr. C~ig when Four Seasons was
originally approved and he would abstain from discussion and vote on this matter.
Mr. Craig said~ when the plat and site plan for Four Seasons was originally approved,
seven years ago, he understood that he was free to use the commerical area for any use allowe
in the ordinance. This has been his understanding with the Planning Staff also. Mr. Russell
said the original site plan showed a full-service gasoline station fronting on Rio Road; not
pumps in front of a convenience store.
Mr. Fisher said the question is whether or not the approval of the conditional use permit
under the old zoning ordinance, or a special use permit under the~present ordinance does in
fact constitute a rezoning of the property, in which case it would allow any use under that
zoning. Mr. St. John said he interprets Section 2-?-4 as giving the Board the power to
grant a change in use without holding a public hearing. Mr. Fisher felt the matter was
not properly before theBoard and felt it should be b~mught to the Board at a public hearing
as an amendment to the conditional~use permit. Motion was then offered by Dr. Iachetta to
advertise and hold a public hearing on a change in the conditional use permit for Four
Seasons PUD on April 21, 1976, at 7:30 P.M. in the Albemarle County Courthouse. The motion
was seconded by Mrs. David and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mrs. David and Messrs. Fisher, Henley and Iachetta.
NAYS: None.
ABSTAIN: Messrs. Dorrier and Roudabush.
Agenda Item No. 5. Micha*l Gleason: Report from Bicentennial Commission and request
for DAR p~aque to be erected on Court Square.
Mr. Gleason, Director of the BicentenniaI Commission, said he has been approached by
the Shadwell Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution, ~who wish to celebrate
"Ail Presidents Day" on April 30, 1976, by dedicating a plaque to Presidents Jefferson,
Madison and Monroe. Motion was offered by Mr. Dorrier, seconded by Dr. Iachetta, to approve
the placement of a Dla~ue in the Court Yard of the Albemarle County Courthouse. Roll was cal
and the motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Borrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Mr. Gleason then gave a report of plans and preparations for the celebration~of the
Bicentennial. He said everything is progressing well and he hopes to meet with the Board
members in the near future to explain to them the scheduled events. He anticipates about
two million visitors to the County during 1976 which means double theenormal traveler and
tourist trade in the area. Mr. Gleason then noted that there is a vacancy on the Sign
Advisory Committee (with Mr. William C. Thacker no longer being a Board member), and request
a replacement. Mr. Fisher then appointed Mr. Roudabush to fill this vacancy, adding that
Mr. Roudabush has had a great deal of experience in these matters through his service on
the Board of~Zmning Appeals for the County. Mr. Gleason concluded by~saying hhat the total
expenditures of the Bicentennial Commission to date has beenaapproximately one million dollaz
with the County contributing about 8% and the~remainder being obtained from the ClDy of
Charlottesville, the Federal Government and private sources.
ed
March 10, 1976 (Regu'lar[~]~t/Mee~ti~g) 09~
Agenda item No. 6. SP-468. JamEs Armstrong (Deferred from February !1~ 1976.)
(Note: Mr. Dorrier said he was abstaining from discussion and vote on this matter as he
formerly represented Mr. Armstrong in this matter.)
Mr. Fisher said when this matter was last before the Board, it was decided that Mr.
Armstrong should meet with the Planning Staff to design a screened area around his property
and that this plan be brought back to the Board within 30 days.
Mr. Jack.Camblos, representing Mr. Armstrong, said that in attempting to comply with the
screening requirements set by the Board, it left Mr. Armstrong's customer's automobiles
accessible to vandals and thieves. He noted that due to these problems, his client could not
comply with the Board's request for total screening of automobiles. He concluded by
stating that his client Ts still willing to cooperate if the Board is willing to compromise
with some type of decorative fence. Mr. Fisher noted that a plat of the property with
proposed screening sugge~tions was to be presented to the Board by Mr. Armstrong. Mr. Camblo~
said the plat was not ready, but he could verbally outline the suggestions. Mr. Armstrong
would like a two or three board fence of a normal height to screen the front of the property.
He would like to keep the parking of cars mostly te the northern side of the building.
Mr. Fisher then r~ad a letter to Mr. Armstrong from the Planning Department dated
February 13, 1976, regarding Mr. Armstrong's submission of a plat detai~ing screening of
his property. (On file in Planning Department).
After considerable discussion as to what the Board had wished the applicant to present
at this meeting, motion was offered by Dr. Iachetta to defer discussion and action until
7:30 P.M., April 7, 1976, and that before this meeting date, the applicant is to either
present in person or send via registered mail to the Planning Department, a site plan
indicating his proposal for parking and screening of his business.
Although the public hearing had been declared closed, Mr. Fishe~ decided to allow public
comment at this time. Mr. David Wood said that when Mr. Armstrong purchased the property in
1972, it was purchased with full knowledge of the restriction that it would require screening
Mr. Roudabush seconded Dr. Iachett's motion for deferral and the motion carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Mrs. David and Messrs. Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
ABSTAIN: Mr. Dorrier.
At 9:35 P.M., the Chairman declared a.five minute recess.
9:40 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at
Agenda Item No. 7. Uiscussion: Public T.V. Service (Request from WVPT-Harrisonburg)
ed
Mr. Thomas Hurlburt of the Qepartment of Education repor~that the present reception
of educatio~%elevision used by the County School System and transmitted from Richmond, is
inadequate and of poor quality. He felt it would be in the best interest of the County to
investigate the possibility of financially supporting WVPT-Harrisonburg to increase their
transmission into Albemarle County. Mrs. David and Mr. Fisher both expressed the feeling thc
if the television station could provide adequate coverage td Albemarle County, they would
consider financial support. Mr. Fisher suggested to Mr. Hurlburt that he continue
investigating the possibility of boosting coverage into the County and report back to the
Board if progress is made.
Agenda Item No. 8.
public wished to speak.
Matters not on the agenda.~from the public'.
No one from the
Agenda Item No. 9. Appointments:
ed
a) Economic Development Commission. Mr. Henley reques~the Board to privately intervie~
the applicant be~fore appointment and requested a deferral until the March 18th meeting.
b) Planning Commission. Mr. Dorrier said he had not been~ able to contact his ~oi~e
for the Commission and requested deferral of this appointment until the meeting of March 18.
Agenda Item No. 10. Approyal of minutes: October 29, November 12, November 19 and
December 30, 1975. No corrections or changes being noted, motion to approve was offered
by Mrs. David, §econded by Mr. Roudabush and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. IlA. Lottery Permit: White Hall Ruritan Club. Motion to approve this
lottery permit as per the Board's adopted policy was offered by Mr. Henley, seconded by Mr.
Dorrier and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. liB. LotteryfPermit: Greenwood Community Center. Motion was offered
by Mr. Henley, seconded by Mr. Dorrier, issuing lotteryDpermit as per the Board's adopted
policy. .Motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
092
March 10, 1976 (Regular Night Meeting)
Agenda Item No. 12. Request for resolUtiontof intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance to
allow for accessory tourist lo~ing in certain zones. Mr. Bailey presented the following
resolution for consideration:
WHEREAS, Albemarle County is an area of great historic
interest to the people of the Commonwealth and of the United
s~ates~ and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that ~large number of tourists
and other visi~ors~..w~ll?be~visiting Albemarle County during the
Bicentennial~.ye~r~of 1976; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors is concerned lest there
be insufficient facilities within the County to provide needed
services for such large numbers of visitors;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the Board of Supervisors
of Albemarle County, Virginia, does intend to amend the Albemarle
County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
By the inclusion in the A-i, RS-~, R-I, R-2 and R-3
districts~ (as Sections 2-1-27, 3-1-15, 4-1-14, 5-1-17
and 6-1-22, respectively, uses permitted by right) a
use reading:
"accessory tourist lodging by permit issued by the
~mning Administrator for successive period~ of six
months pursuant to fire and safety regulations pro-
mulgated by the Albemarle County Fire Marshal."
By the inclusion in Article 16 of new section 16-2-1
reading:
"ACCESSORY TOURIST LODGING: One or more rooms, located
within~a single-family dwelling which is actually used
as such, which rooms are used, secondarily to such
single,family use, for the temporary accommodation
of transients in return for compensation, whether or not
such rooms are used ina¢onjunction with other portions
of such dwe!~ing."
AND, FURTHER, requests the Albemarle County Planning Commission
to hold public hearing on said proposed' amendments and directs that
a report be given to this Board at the earliest date possible;
preferably as soon as seven days after legal advertising reqm~rements
are~met for this public hearing.
Mr. Bailey added that this request came&,abo~t due to the anticipated number of tourists
in Albemarle County this Spring and Summer due to the Bicentennial Celebration, Mrs. Joyce
Carton said she hopes this amendment can be approved for a six~month perdod to cover the
peak tourist months. Mr. St. John noted that if adopted,~hhis amendment witl be permanent
until the Zoning Ordinance is ~amended to remove this provision. ~
After a~brief discussion as to the definition of a "tourist home"~ motion was offered
by Mrs. Dav~d, seconded by Mr. Roudabush, to adopted the above resolution. ~oll was called
and the motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, H~n~y, Iachetta and].~Roudabush.
None.
Agenda Item No. 13. Request for transfer of funds: Title XX Program - Social Services.
Mr. Bailey said the Director of the Social Services Department has requested the creation
of a~new line item in her budget for the current fiscal year. The request is to ~ransfer
$30,000 from line item 80C-703,~Aid to Dependent Children, to a new line item to be
designated as Title XX-Purchase of Services. The Title XX program is a new program in which
local agencies or civic organizations can contract with the local welfare department for a
specific program. The local agency or civic organizaiion is responsible for providing 25%
of the costs of the~.progr~and the Federal government reimburses for the remaining 75%.
Dr. Iachetta wished more information as to what'type Of aid this Titl~ XX program provid
Mr. Dorrier suggested that if the Board had serious questions regarding this Title XX
pragram Mrs. Morris be invited to attend a Board meeting to discuss this matter.
Dr. Iachetta and Mrs. David agreed and Mr. Fisher declared this item to be carried over
for d~scussion on March 17.
Agenda Item No. 14. Check Cancellation. County of Albemarl~e Check No. 6398, dated
March 12, 1975, made payable to Oak Ridge Garden Apartments, in the amount of $30,00, was
issued by request of the Social s~rviaes Department~;add~as never cashed and was presented
for cancellation. The DireCtor of the Social Services Department said the client to whom
this check was given in order to make a security deposit on an apartment held the check witho
the knowledge of her dep~rtment until March 1, 1976. Motion was th~n offered by Mr. Henley,
seconded by Mr. Dottier, ordering the cancellat&mn of this check. The motion carried by the
following recorded vote:
~YES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
.t
March 10, 1976~ (Regular Night_~Meeting)
March 17, 1976 ~Adjou'rned from March~10, 1976)
093
Not Docketed. Mr. Dorrier asked Mr..Bail~ey for a report regarding fire fighting
facilities in Scottsville. Mr. Bailey said that since the second major fire, the County
"~gineer, County Executive and County Fire Marshal had met with representatives of the
Town Council and Volunteer Fire Company to explore ramp facilities for use by the ~mper
trucks. Thehboat launching dock which belongs to the State Game and Inland Fisheries
Department was ~sed by the fire trucks during Scottsville's second fire, at which time mud
had to be cleared off the concrete deck and gravel added~to the travel area in order to
facilitate its ~e~ In addition to improvements to the ~oat launch ramp, other methods
of securing water were suggested, such as using the raw water line of the old filtration
plant and building ~ipe into the dam structure at Mink Creek.
Mr. Dorrier then offered motion to adopt the following resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle Count~,
Virginia, that $5,000 be and the same hereby is ~ppr~priated from
the General Fund and transferred to the General Operating Fund and
coded to 7E - Fire Suppression Facilities-Scottsville; said funds
to be us. ed for improvements to the'ramp at Scottsville, investigation
of th~ raw water line from the James River and a~y t~mporary
improvements that can be made within this amount to other sources
of water supply for the Scottsville area for the purpose of fire
protection.
The motion was seconded by Dr. Iachetta.
Mr. Dorrier said although this appropriation will.temporarily aid the situation in
Scottsville, he did not wish to eliminate discussions on fire hydrants for the Scottsville
area. Mr. Fisher said Mr. Kelly Reynolds, ~ounty Fire Marshal, is scheduled to meet with
the Board on March 18 and the Scottsville problem will be discussed at that time. There
being no further discussion, roll was called and the motion carried by the fo!lowing
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier,VFisher, Henley', Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
At 10:55 P.M., motion was offered by Dr. Iachetta, seconded by Mr. Dorrier, to adjourn
this meeting until ~:~0 P.M. on March 17~ 1976, in the Board Room of the County Office
Building for continuation of budget work sessions. The motion carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher,!~Henley, Iachetta and Roudabush.
None.
~airman
March 17, 1976 (Adjourned from March 10, 1976)
An adjourned meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was
held on March 17, ~976, at 1:30 P.M. in the Board Room of the County Office Building,
Charlottesville, Virginia; said meeting being adjourned from March 10, 1976.
Present: Mrs. Opal D. David and Messrs. Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr., Gerald E. Fisher,
J. T.'Henley, Jr., F. Anthony Iachetta and W. S. Roudabush.
Absent: None.
Officers present: County Executive, J. Harvey Bailey.
The meeting was called to order at 1:30 P.M. hy Mr. Fisher, Chairman, who immediately
requested the Board ~o into executive sessimn for the purpose of discussing personnel matters
Motion was then offered by Dr. Iachetta, seconded by Mr. Dorrier, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Iachetta and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: Mr. Henley.
The me~ting was reconvenad from executive session at 2:00 P.M., with Mr. Henley in
attendance at this time. The work session on the 1976-77 County Budget ~egan, with the
following departments on the agenda:
1)
2)
3)
6)
7)
Code 80 - Social Services Department (Karen Morris)
Code 18B.1 - Regional Health Department (Dr. George Moore)
Code 18B.2 - Mental Health and Retardation Services Board (Robert Lunn)
Code 18B.4 - Piedmont Community College (Dr. James Walpole)
Code 18B.5 - Extension Service (James Butler)
Code ~8~B.6 - Youth Employment Servi~e (Robert Dwoskin)
Code 18B.7 - District Home (Robert Sampson)
At 4:45 P.M., Mr. Fisher requested a motion to adjourn into executive session to discuss
personnel matters. Motion was then offered by Mrs. David, seconded by Dr. Iachetta, and
carried by the following recorded vote: