1974-11-1911-19-74
353
A meeting of the Board of County ~Supervi.sors of Albemarle Counvy, Virginia, ad-
journed from November 13, 1974, was held at 9:00 a.m. on November 19, 1974, in the
Board Room of the County Office Building. (This meeting was held in place of regularly
scheduled meeting of November 21, due to the fact that Board members would be attending
annual meeting of the Virginia Association of Counties on that date.)
Stuart F. Carwile, Gerald E. Fisher, J. T. Henley,Jr.,
Gordon L. Wheeler and Lloyd F. WOod, Jr.
Present: Messrs.
William C. Thacker, Jr.,
Absent: None
Officers Present:
Counvy Executive and County Attorney.
The meeting was called to order and opened with the Lord's Prayer led by Mr. Gordon
Wheeler, Chairman.
Of the meetings for which minutes had been mailed, it appeared that members had
only had an opportunity to read ~he first three sets and it further appeared that copy
of the afternoon session of June 26th had not been received. Accordingly on motion
by Mr. Fisher, seconded by Mr. Thacker, minutes of the meetings of June 12 (afternoon
and night), 1974, and June 20, 1974, were approved by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None.
The Clerk was directed to mail copies of the June 26th afternaon session to the
Board and approval of all other completed minutes was deferred until the next regular
business meeting.
Communication was received from Mr. Fred Landes, attorney for Mr. Walter Cushman,
requesting acceptance into the Secondary System of cervain streets in Meriwether
Hill Subdivision. Mr. Perry of the Highway Department advised that these roads were
up to Highway standards. The following resolution was offerea by Mr. Fisher,
seconded by Mr. Carwile, and adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that the Virginia Department of Highways be and
is hereby requested to accept into the Secondary Sysvem of Highways,
subject to final inspection and approval by the Resident Highway
Department, the following roads in Section Three in Meriwether
Hill Subdivision:
Meriwether Drive
Le~s Street
Leeds Lane
- 2,067.84 feet
- 480.57 feet
- 310.00 feet
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Virginia DeparTment of Highways be and is
hereby guaranteed a 50 foot unobstructed right-of-way and drainage easements
along this requested addition as recorded by plats in the Office~.of the Clerk
of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 510, Page 205, and Deed
Book 563, page 46.
The County Executive submitted request for svreev sign for Whitewood Road to be
erected on the northeast corner of Hydraulic Road (Route 743) at its intersection
with Whitewood Road and within the right-of-way of Route 743. Mr. Warner advised that
the naming of the road would have to be coordinated through the Planning Department.
He also advised that Whitewood Road has no~ been accepted into the Secondary System,
that bond has not been posted and they could not erect sign until bond is posted.
Mr. Thacker suggested that the matter be deferred until the road is taken into the
Secondary System. Mr. Wood stated that he felt the matter should be reviewed again
since he feared the road would not be acceptable by the time bond ~s posted. Mr.
Wheeler requested that John Humphrey be asked to check to see about bond with County
so action can be taken at a later date. No action was taken on this request.
Mr. Batchelor stated he felt there should be some way in which the Board could
pass a blanket ordinance that once roads are in the System and meet with Highway
Department planning, that the owners can purchase the signs and the Highway Department
erect them without everyone coming before the Board. Mr. Warner said it appeared to
him that some type of County ordinance could be adopted along that line. In dis-
cussion, it was pointed out that the road or street name would have to be approved
by the Plan~in~ Department. Mr. Batchelor advised that he would try to bring some-
thing back to the Board on this.
The County Executive submitted three oommunications from the Virginia Department
of Highways confirming requests included in resolutions'~of this Board as follows:
"October 28, 1974
Secondary System
Additions and Abandonment
Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Gentlemen:
As requested in resolution by your Board on August 15, 1974, the following
additions to and abandonment from the Secondary System of Albemarle County are
hereby approved, effective October 28, 1974.
ADDITION LENGTH
Section 5 of new connection Route 713 at right of
Sta. 117+30, Proj. 0020-002-106, C501. 0.06 Mi.
Section 6 of new connection Rte. 714 at left of
Sra. 160+00, Proj. 0020-002-106, C501 0.05 Mi.
ABANDONMENT
Section 4 of old location Rte. 713 from old Rte. 20 to new
connection opposite Sta. 117+30, Proj. 0020-002-106,C501. 0.14 Mi.
Sincerely,
(signed)
J.K. Harwood, Deputy Commissioner
and Chief Engineer"
"October 30, 1974
Route 20-Project 0020-002-106,C~501
Changes in Prsmary & Secondary System
Albemarle County-North of Scottsville
Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County ~
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Gentlemen:
In acoordance with a resolution passed by your Board on August 15, 1974
changes in the Primary System made necessary by relocation and construction on
Route 20 in Albemarle County were confirmed by the Highway and Transportation
Commission on October 24, 1974, as shown on the attached sketch, described as
follows:
SECTIONS DISCONTINUED AS PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 33.1-144 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA: ~-~
Section 1 - Old location of Route 20, west of the new location, from the~
intersection of Route 713 northwesterly 0.15 mile to the new
location at Station 117+30.
Section 2 - Old location of Route 20, west of the new location, from the new
location at Station 157+30 northerly 0.28 mile to the new
location ay Station 172+00.
Section 3 - Old location of Route 20, east of the new location, from the
new location at Station 222+50 northeasterly 0.26 mile to the
new location at Station 238+00.
355
Section 8 - Old location of Route 20, west of the new location, from the
new location at Station 119+10 northeasterly 0.11 mile to the
new location at Station 125+00.
Section 9 - Old location of Route 20, east of the new location, from the
new location at Station 143+50 northerly 0.15 mile to the
new location at Station 151+50.
SECTION TRANSFERRED TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM AS PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 33.1-35
OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA:
Section 7 - Old location of Route 20, west of the new location, from
the new location at Station 102+50 northwesterly 0.10 mile
to the intersection of Route 713.
Sincerely yours,
(signed)
J. E. Harwood, Deputy Commissioner
and Chief Engineer"
"October 28, 1974
Secondary System
Addition and Abandomma~t
Albemarle County
Board~of Supervisors of Albemarle County
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Gentlemen:
As requested in resolution by your Board on August 15, 1974, the following
addition to and abandonment from the Secondary System of Albemarle County
are hereby approved, effective October 28, 1974.
ADDITION LENGTH
Sections 3 and 4 of new location Rte. 660 between
Sta. 26+90 and Sta. 65+60, Proj. 0660-002-145,C501. 0.35 mi.
ABANDONMENT
Sections 1, 2 & 5 of old location Rte. 660 between
Sta. 26+90 and Sta. 65+50.
0~.25 Mi~..
Sincerely,
J. E. Harwood, Deputy Commissioner
and Chief Engineer"
(signed)
Mr. Warner reported that due to the current economic situation, plans for Route
684 were still not being pursued as was discussed at the regular October day meeting.
He stated that he would ~ike to have some expression from the Board soon so he could
advise the right-of-way people to stop negotiating. It was decided that vhis meeting
would be adjourned until 4:00 p_.~m, on December 11, 1974, to discuss this and other
highway matters, including a report from Mr. Warner on Milton Road.
A petition and numerous letters were received in connection with the hazardous
condition of Georgevown Road. Mr. Wood advised that he has mev with citizens who are
interested in improving this road. Mr. Warner also stated that his department is
taking the big locust tree down and shrubbery is being cut down. Mr. Wood requested
that this matter be put on the agenda for 4:00 p.m. and for 7:30 p.m. on December
llth. Lengthy discussian was given to this situation and it was decided that a re-
solution would be adopted at the meeting of the llth stressing the importance of
improving Georgetown Road.
Mr. F. E. Paulette appeared with his attorney, Mr. Gayle Pickford, and presented
petition requesting vacation of the plat of Bellevue Subdivision, Scottsville, Virginia.
It was pointed out that this would require a public hearing, adv'ertise for two con-
secutive weeks at least twelve days prior to the hearing. On motion by Mr. Thacker,
seconded by Mr. Carwile, it was ordered that public hearing on an ordinance for the
vacation be set for 9:30 a.m. on December 19, 1974, and that proper advertisement of
said hearing be published. Motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None
11-19-7
/56
Mr. Fisher referred to memo which he sent to Mr. Warner regarding access to
Flordon from Route 250 West down to railroad brid~e. He wanted to know if Mr. Warner
had any information he could take back to those people. Mr. Warner said he did not
but he has had people out there checking on it and he knows what the condition is.
Mr. Fisher also referred co letter some months ago from Mr. Joseph Gibson requesting
the Highway Department to do something about the entrance to West Leigh and he asked
Mr. Warner if he had heard any more about that since the Board passed its resolution.
Mr. Warner said he assumed the Highway Department's position is the same, that they
are not going to participate in that, but he does not know what they are considering
in nexv year's improvement program. He should know something around the first of
the year.
Hr. Fisher stated that the people in the area of Crossroads are very pleased
with the work that has been done there. He commended Mr. Warner for this work.
Mr. Henley advised Mr. Warner that Route 811 needs some scraping before winter
sets in.
Statements of Expenses of the Department of Finance, the Sheriff's Office and
the Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney were submitted for the monvh of October,
1974. On motion by Mr. Fisher, seconded by Mr. Carwile, ~hese svatements were
approved by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None.
Statemen~ of Expenses incurred in the maintenance of the County Jail was sub-
mitted for the month of October, 1974. Also pmesented was summary of prisoner days
and jail physician's bill in the amount of $50.00, of which two-thirds is reimbursable
by the Stave. Mr. Batchelor advised that~ this was the last full month's report on
operation of the County Jail. On motion .by Hr. Fisher, seconded by Hr. Carwile,
these statements were approved by the following recorded vove:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None
Reporv of the County Executive was submitted for the month of October, 1974,
for information.
ReNort of the Department o~Social Services for the month of September, 1974, was
submitted as information in accordance with Section 63.1-52 of the Code of Virginia.
Mr. Wheeler called attention to report on Food Stamps which he requested and copies
of which were mailed to vhe Board.
Report on audit of accounts of the Albemarle County Court was received from the
Auditor of Public Accounts for the period April 1 through June 30, 1973, and Board
members were advised that'this was on file for inspection by anyone so desiring.
Mr. D. D. Hudson appeared in support of letter requesting the County and City to
provide an office for the local magisvrates away from their present location at the
City Police Station. Mr. Hudson reiterated the inadequamies of the office as outlined
1~-1~-74
357
in his letter, copies of which were mailed to the Board prior to the meeting along with
supporting letters from Judges Pickford, Marshall and Zehler. He recommended that the
facility be moved to the Wood Building an Court Square which would be convenient to
all law enforcement offices as well as the public. Mr. Hudson advised that City
Council unanimously approve the proposed change. Mr. Henley report that at the last
Jail Board meeting the Chief of Police and the Sheriff recommended that the offise
be located at the Joint Security Complex. Mr. Batchelor said he felt the location
should be as convenient as possible for the public. He said he had not heard of the
recommendation made at the Jail Board meeting. He stated that the Jail Complex was
designed and planned before anyone ever gave any consideration to the new form of
judicial process as compared to the old J.P. system. Mr. Wheeler said he felt civil
warrants should be kept somewhere in the Court Square area. Mr. Wood said he felt the
money should be paid out of State funds since the State changed the procedure.
Mr. Wheeler said he supported the request. Mr. Carwile said he supported the request
and concurred that civil warrants need to be located in the Court Square area but
he wondered if there might be some way the c~iminal part could be located at the
Jail Complex. A lengthy discussion with Mr. Hudson followed as to the pros and cons
of such an arrangement. Mr. Thacker said he felt this is something that needs to be
for the convenience of the citizens using this office.
done ~'~meC~ly/He said Mr. Hudson's request should be granted, and the Board appro-
priate capital funds for furniture and equipment. Mr. Thacker then requested that
Mr. Hudson and other magistrates investigate this further to see if something can
be done to expedite the criminal process.
In discussion, Mr. Wood said perhaps it would be best to carry the matter over
to the next meeting and request input from the Sheriff and Chief of Police and re-
commendation of the Jail Board. Mr. ~Wheeler said he felt we must move on to get
something accomplished now. On the basis of this, Mr. Wood seconded Mr. Thacker's
motion and the following resolution carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood..
NAYS: None
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia that $1,400 be and the same hereby is appropriated from the
General Fund and transferred to the General Operating Fund for
capital outlay for furniture and equipment; for payment of rent and telephone
from December 1, 1974 through June 30, 1975, for a magistrates office, and
expenditure of these funds is hereby approved."
Request for a restricted road to serve seven lots in Long Meadow Subdivision,
near White Hall, Virginia, was received. Property is shown on plat drawn by
William S. Roudabush, Jr., as a division of Parcel 44, Tax Map 40. Mr. John Humphrey,
County Planner, said this request has been reviewed by the County Engineer and the
County Attorney. The Planning Commission recommends approval subject to the
following conditions: 1) Road plans to be approved by the County Engineer and road
bond to be posted in lieu of actual construction prior to final plat approval; and
2) grading permit must be obtained.
After lengthy discussion as to the length of the road and whether or not auto-
mobiles would be able to negotiate the turn in the proposed ro~d, Mr. Thacker
offered motion to approve this request as recommended by the Planning Commission
adding condition No. 3 that Parcel "A" be excluded from use of the~road. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and carried by the following recorded yore:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler,
NAYS: None
Mr. William Elder, Administrative Supervisor for the 16th Distriot Juvenile
Domestic Relations Court, was present to discuss appointments to the Court Service
Unit - Advisory Council. Referred to letter:
Mr. Gordon L. Wheeler, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
Albemarle Court
908 East High Streev
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
,,October 8, '1974
Re:
Court Service Unit Advisory
Council Member
Dear Mr. Wheeler:
In accordance with Section 16.1-203 of the Code of Virginia the Court
Service Unit serving the Sixteenth District wishes co esvablish an advisory
council "to consult and confer with the unit directly from rime ~o time
relative to the development and extension of the court servioe program."
tt is my desire to establish the advisory council by January 1, 1975.
Preliminary feelings are that the council will meev four (4) times each
year relative to the service units program to provide appropriate services
vo the youth of your government jurisdiction.
I am sure that you will take the utmost care in making the appointment.
When the appointment is made would you please let me.~.know, so that I
can make the proper notification as to the date,time and place of the
first meeting.
If you have any quesvions, please let me know.
Thank you for your kind consideration and attention in this matter.
Sincerely,
(siBned)
Arthur G. Daniels
Director Court Service Unit"
Mr. Elder pointed out that the appointment by the Board would be for one member
per jurisdiction, and that there are nine jurisdictions represented by the 16th
District Court Service Unit, which were named as follows: Albemarle, Charlottesville,
Madison, Greene, Orange, Louisa, Oulpepper, Fluvanna, and Goochland Counties. This
council would meet four times a year.
Mr. Elder then proceeded to hand ou~ a copy of Virginia Code Section 16.1-203,
wherein this Court Service Unit Advisory Council would be established.
Mr. Fisher noted that the Thomas Jefferson Planning District has a criminal
justice advisory council which have representation from the court system. What will
this group do that is ~ifferent from the criminal justice advisory council that is
already set up Un Planning Districts.
Mr. Elder stated that the idea of the group was to provide community in-put as
to the actual operation of the court service unit for every jurisdiction. The group
would act as an advisory group to the court service unit director, and hopefully pro-
vide better service in the jurisdictions involved.
Mr. Wood recommended that this be put on the agenda for the December 19th meeting
for
appointment, and mo~ion was seconded by Mr. Fisher and role was called:
359
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None.
Request to amend the Albemarle County Code to take action on motor vehicles
in order to allow ~ of state highway regulations on streets not yet
part of the state highway system. This would require an advertised public
hearing by the Board of Supervisors. This would be in relation to roads
that are in private subdivisions.
Mr. Fred Payne brought to the Board's attention, that this ordinance comes
from section 46.1-180.1, which allows members of the Board to establish this
type ordinance and appoint an agent to do this. This amendment is intended to
supplement the section, concerning the adoption of state and county regulations
to cover subdivision streets not yet in the system.
Mr. Wheeler recommended that it be advertised for public hearing on the !9th of
December. Motion was offered~by Mr. Thacker to advertise for public hearing
on December 19, 1974 at 10:30 a.m. in the Board Room. Motion was seconded
by Mr. Wood, and carried by the following vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None.
Memorandum regarding a Go-Kart facility was introduced by Mr. Batchelor, for
inclusion under zoning ordinance.
"October 29, 1974
Mrs. Ruth M. Miller
Zoning Administrator
411 East High Street
Charlottesville, Virginia
22901
RE: Go-Kart at Former Avon Street Landfill Site
Dear Ruth:
This is to inform you that I am in accord with your opinion that a
go-kart track owned and/or operated by the City of Charlottesville is not
a public facility within the meaning of Section 2-1-19 of the Albemarle County
Zoning Ordinance. I believe that it is the intent of this section to permit
the establishment of facilities related to the governmental functions of
sovereign bodies. I do believe that this section was intended to cover
this sort of essentially commercial operation the only connection of which to
an agency of the sovereign is that the land is owned by a City.
Moreover, I believe that the term "local government" in this section
of the Ordinance refers only to the government of the locality in whose
jurisdiction the property is located, i.e. the Albemarle County government.
For theset~reasons I believe that this matter should be treated as an
application for a new use under Section 11-4 of the Ordinance.
Sincerely yours,
(Signed) Frederick W. Payne Deputy County Attorney"
During discussion, it was pointed out by Mr. Payne that it would have to be
referred to the Planning Commission for their recommendation.
Mr. Wheeler suggested that a motion be brought forth to recommend this be
referred to the Planning Commission under "Special Use" section.
Mr. St. John felt in order to save time he would call Mr. Huja of the City, tell
him to apply
~ ...... ~ ...... ~= and simultaneously make application for~
special use permit.
360
1i-i9-74
At present there is nowhere in the CoUnty where a Go-Kart facility can be located
due to Zoning. Mr. Carwile made motion to get a recommendation from the Planning
Commission as to what zones the planner would recommend for Go-Kart~ which was
seconded by Mr. Thacker, and carried by the following recorded vote.
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None.
Mr. Batchelor brought the subject of refund of personal property taxes before
the Board. A refund is necessary in the amount of $1,949.95 for personal property.
Account was under budget this year for this amount. These were erroneously assessed
taxes. We need to appropriate this amount to Code 0-1001 to take care of these refunds.
(NOTE: Re:
Refund Procedure, refer to Mr. Jim Bowling's letter to Mr. Melvin Breeden
Department of Finance, dated November 8, 1974.)
Mr. Jim Bowling noted that there is a specific procedure to be followed in giving
refunds to taxes. The proper procedure is that the Director of Finance must present
a certificate to the Board of Supervisors that the refund is erroneous under consent
of the County Attorney; then the C~a~:~=~ directs the Finance Department to give the
refund. Refunds can be made only two years back.
Mr. Batchelor advised that this request requires an appropriation of $1,949.95, but
the year 1971 will have to be eliminated from this request. Due to this discrepancy,
this matter was deferred until next month.
Request from the Virginia Association of Counties for an increase in yearly dues.
Mr. Wood noted that an appropriation is needed to cover additional expenses for
purchase or renta~ new facilities and offered motion to approve appropriation of
$624.00, however,/motion died for lack of a second. It was the concensus of the Board
that .no action be taken until after the Virginia-Association of Counties Annual Meeting.
as follows:
"VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING
August 9 and 10, 1974
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED THAT the By-Laws of the Virginia Association of Counties be and
hereby are amended as follows:
ARTICLE II
MEMBERSHIP DUES
"(a) The annual membership dues of a county shall be six cents (6¢)
per capita for each jurisdiction, provided that no jurisdiction shall pay mem-
bership dues in excess of 9ighteen thousand dollars ($18,000).,. in any one fiscal
year. The population of the county shall be the current estimsted population
as determined by some competent research agency selected by the Executive
Board such as the Tayloe Murphy Institute of the University of Virginia.
'(b) Beginning in the fiscal year 1'975-76, the Executive Board is authorized
to set the membership dues at such a per capita rate as is necessary to provide
for the expenditures of the AssociatiOn for' each fiscal year; provided, however,
that no coqnty shall pay more than $18,000 in any one fiscal year.
'(c) No county whose membership dues are not fully paid at least prior to the
date of the Annual Meeting shall be considered in good standing or entitled to
vote at such meeting."
Mr. Fisher offered a motion to adopt the following resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors, Albemarle County, Virginia,
that $4,108.68 be and the same hereby is appropriated from the general fund and trans-
361
7
ferred into the general operating fund for expenditure of County Attorney's
office and expenditure of thsse funds is h~reby approved.
Foregoing resolution was seconded by Mr. Henley, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler, and Wood.
None
Equalization of Pay Ordinance was adopted on June 20, 1974, but no appropriations
were made at this time to cover this ordinance. Paymenv only includes citizen members
and does not include staff or Board members. The total appropriation required at
this time equals $4,900.00.
Mr. Thacker offered motion to ~ the Equalization of Pay Ordinance, motion
was seconded by Mr. Carwile and the following resolution was adopted by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS: None
Messrs: Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler, and Wood
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of SGper~isors, AlbemsrlaCounty, Virginia
that $4,900 be appropriated from the General Fund and transferred vo the
General Operating fund:
Jail Board (2 members x 2 meetings a month)
Board of Zoning Appeals (5 members x 1
meeting a month) (Less $t,000 already
appropriated in the budget). 1,000
Community Action Organization ( 1 member X
1 meeting a month) 300
Joint Airport Commission (3 members X 1
meeting a month) 900
Thomas Jefferson Planning District Com-
mission (1 member x 1 meeting/month) 300
From the General Operating Fund to the School Fund:
$1,200 6B100
10El40
18c.3
21
18B.6
Piedmont Community College Board of Directors
(4 members X 1 meeting/month)
1,200 1SE.1
· O~A~ $4,900
and expenditure of these funds is hereby approved.
Mr. Fisher again brought up the matter of Board members who serve on the Planning
Commission and Welfare Board being paid compensation for such services. The Board
was in agreement that this matter should be discussed on December 19, 1974.
Mrs. Marian Rabinowitz, Chairwoman of the Jail Board, and Mr. Albert Shank, Jail
Administrator were present on behalf of the Jail Board to request approval for hiring
of three additional correcvion officers, part Of whose sa.laries have already been
approved by the State Compensation Board. At present the facility is at capacity for
male prisoners, and it is impossible to run with a skeleton s~aff. The share the
County would have to pay is $1,574. ~
\
\
Mr. Henley pointed out there ware a number of problems whic~necessitated the need
for the three additional officers, and offered motion to adopt the f~llowing resolu-
tion for approval and appropriation of the $1,57~.
BE IT ~ESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors, Albemarle County, Virginia
that the budget of the Regional Jail be increased by the following amounts:
1~9 - Compensati,on -, Assistants $13,122
2~ - Hosnitalization Insurance-Employer's 330
~ Sha~e ~
362
11-19-7~,
296 - Life Insurance - Employer's Share $ 41
297 - Retirement - Employerts Share 236
298 - Social Security - Employer's Share 767
TOTAL $14,496
To be provided as follows:
626 - Salaries $ 9,444
722 - City of Charlottesville 3,368
723 - County of Albemarle 1,68~
TOTAL ~
and, BE ~T ~HRTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $1,574 be transferred from the
General Fund to the General Operating Fund for County share of expenses of
the Regional Jail, and expenditure of these funds is hereby approved.
Mr. George Gilmer, Jr. wanted to speak to the Board regarding the possibility of
the City Police'Department handling transportation of prisoners from the City, ..........
County and Sheriff's offices.
Mr. Fisher seconded Mr. Henley's motion to approve the Jail Board's request for
the additional correction officers.
Mr. Gilmer pointed out that he felt the request should be further investigated
regarding overcrowdedness of jail and how to handle situation. He felt there were a
lot of unanswered questions. He felt vacations and taking prisoners to the hospital
w~e only unusual circumstances, and they would not need the additional personnel
all the time. Mrs. Rabinowitz stated that they w~re not unusual circumstances, but
everyday occurrences.
Mr. Thacker 'asked haw~transportation of these prisoners had been handled in the
past. Mr. Shank stated the City Jail would send by Jail Personnel or Road Deputies, and
./---the County likewise
/but the C~a~.ly does not have Road Deputies.
Mr. Batchelor stated that he spoke to a former County employee who said if any-
one gets sick , there is no one to replace himo~ey are working overtime and weekends,
both Saturday and Sunday.
Mr. Thacker at this time brought~up a point which was later suggested should be
brought up at the meeting of the Virginia Association of Counties in Richmond. His
point was that at the present time there are 22 prisoners presently being held for
transfer to the State system with one offender having a sentence of 77 years. These
prisoners should not be held in the County Jail System, it is costing the county money
that we should not be paying out, and we do not have the facilities to handle this
large number of prisoners. Zt should be brought to the attention of the State as soon
as possible.
Mr. Wheeler returned to the original request for the additional three correction
officers, and motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, ~heeler, and Wood.
NAYS: None
Mr. Clarence McClure, Superintendent of Albemarle Count.y Schools was present to
discuss Bingo Permits. He suggest~that since the P~.~T.A. is literally part of the
school sys~emj the Board allow a general permit to the school system.
!Mr. Wheeler stated that one person had to be responsible. Mr. Bowling suggested
11-19-74
a permit be issued to the School Board and they in turn could delegate authority.
Mr. Fisher pointed out tha~the one person appointed had to make sure reports were
made as to how revenues are received and expanded. If one person would take this
responsibility, then a blanket permit could be issued.
Mr. McClure said the responsibility would be his, the leg work would be done
by the Assistant Superintendent of Schools.
Mr. Fisher pointed 'out that they cannot act on a permit until an application
is received on behalf of the sahool system. Mr. McClure will take care of filing the
application for the Board's approval on the 19th of December, 1974.
Mr. Carwile offered motion to adopt resolution regarding Title !II funds in the
amount of $8,334.00 in these three categories: 17Q(a), 17Q(b2-205), 17Q(b2109a).
Motion was seconded by Mr. Wood. There was no further discussion, and motion
was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler, Wood
NAYS: None
BE IT RESOLVED by.the Board of Supemvisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia that the sum of $8,334.00 be appropriated from the School
Operating Fund and Coded as follows:
17Qa-218 $ 300.00
17Qb2-205 3,500.00
iYQb2-109a 4,534.00
$8,334.00
Another subject discussed with Mr. McClure was the sale of Albemarle County
School Board property to Randolph A. Maupin, said land designated as Parcel 4 on
Tax Map 17. Mr. St. John made reference vo appraisal made by Mr. James A. Nunnally
and that Mr. Maupin's offer of $1,000 is reasonable.
Mr. Thacker did not like the idea of a personal sale of County property. He
felt that any disposal of public property should be done in a public manner would
like to see it advertised and have sealed bids received.
After some further discussion along the lines of sealed bid advertising, motion
was made by Mr. Thacker and seconded by Mr. Wood that the parcel of land presently
owned by the School Board be advertised, and sealed bids be received for it's sale,
with the School Board having the right vo accept or reject all offers.
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler, Wood
NAYS: None
Mr. Wood brought to Mr. McClure's attention thav at Woodbrook School there is a
well lot owned by the County, but not being used at the present time for anything.
It is constantly being vandalized and is a hazard. Mr. McClure said~is a hazard,
and if the County will transfer it to the School Board, they will have the building
demolished. Mr. Wheeler suggested that Mr. Batchelor check into the matcer.
Mr. Kelly P. Reynolds was present to request the Board to authorize funds for .~
service and inventory of fire hydrants in the County. He stated he wants authority
to service the County hydrants, locate all hydrants and mark them on the map. At
11-19-7~
present there is no map showing location of these hydrants. He wants to check them
out for flow, pressure reading, make sure they work, graphite the threads, replace
gaskets if needed, clear grounds around them, stamp on identifying number, plot on map
and then paint it. Reasons for this are not only to locate.the hydrants for fire
purposes, but also for fire insurance purposes.
Mr. Reynolds suggested that off-duty firemen would be the best source of labor
to handle this inspection procedure~ and that this inspection be conducted on a
semi-annual basis.
Mr. Wheeler commented on the situation of non,working fire hydrants. He felt
a price of approximately $2.00 each would be money well spent.
Mr. Henley wanted to know why the County Service Authority cannot handle the
servicing of hydrants. Mr. Batchelor stated that the Service Authority is small,
and probably would not be able to get to it.
Mr. Henley pointed out that all the volunteer firemen could do was to map out
their locations, and the Service Authority could not only map, but repair at the
same time.
Mr. Batchelor stated that if the Service Authority were able to do the work on
the hydrants, they would have to charge the County back because it is the County's
duty to provide fire protection. Mr. Thacker agreed.
Mr. Batchelor pointed out that there is a need for a thorough'study on the hydrant
system, there are many hydrants in Scottsville for instance (th~s would mean major
repairs) which do not work at all.
Mr. Henley stated that the Service Authority could maintain and the County pay
for expenses.
Mr. Wood offered motion to authorize the County Executive to request the Service
Authority to handle this and coordinate this work with the ~ire Marshall. Motion
was seconded by Mr. Carwile and motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
~. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker,
Whee ler,~Wood~
AYES:
Messrs.
NAYS: None~
or
Mr. Fisher menvioned Mr~ Leggett of Flordon Subdivision had requested 2/3 more
He
hydrants~then wrote Mr. Batchelor requesting Jefferson C~un~y Firemen's Association
/the the
proceed investigat~gIvy/White Hall hydrants i~/budget this year and request recommen-
dation for Flordon, he is no~ sure the Firemen's Association should handle~Y~~~
In relation to the above hydmant problem, the members of the Board discussed the
overall problem of hydrants and that many more are required to make an effective
system. Mr. Wheeler suggested that Mr. Batchelor draft a resolution for the December
how vo handle the hydrant problem. ~ ~~-~
19th
agenda
on
The next item to be discussed on the agend~ was the Lease o£~he'Mountain House
Farm. Mr. Frederick Payne, Deputy County Attorney had asked for extended period and
did research at the Attorney General's office, and made the following explanation of
the Lease:
3,6 5
Research was done and they found it was unlawful for the County to have a five
year lease. Therefore, they have a one year lease renewable for periods of one year
automatically with arrangements for termination with thirty days notice. Have also
included a provision that provides the lessors (Mrs. Haskel and Mr. Brown) will not
terminate this lease except due to causes stated in the lease such as nonpayment
of rent, etc. during a three year period of time. In effect, the County does have a
three year lease. The County however, can terminate this lease at the end of one year
if desired. The reason is that State law prohibits the County from binding vhe revenue
of the County for more than one year at a time.
It will take one month from the signing of this contract t~ get a change order
from the F.C.C. and units are presently being installed on the towers themselves.
Motion to authorize the Chairman to sign the following lease was offered by Mr.
Thacker and seconded by Mr. Carwile, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler, ood,
NAYS: None~
"THIS AGREEMENT, made this 19th day of November, 1974, by and between
ANN ROBINS HASKELL, owner, and J. NELSON BROWN, tenant, hereinafter collectively
referred to as Lessors, and the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, hereina£ter referred to as
lesses,
WITNE S SE TH :
That the Lessors hereby rent and demise unto the Lessee a portion of
that certain tract or parcel of land lying on Patterson Mountain in
Albemarle County, Virginia, known as Mountain House Farm, sufficient for the
installation of one radio communications base station unit, hereinafter more
particularly described, for a term of one (1) year from the date hereof. For
and in consideration thereof, Lessee agrees to pay to Lessors a rental cal-
culated as follows: At the end of each period of six (6) months from vhe date
hereof, Lessee shall pay to Lessors a sum to be determined according to the
number of mobile units in use during such period by L6ssee as follows:
(t) 1-10 units, $150.00
(2) 11-20 units,
(3) 21-30 units, $255.00
(4) over 30 units, $255.00 plus $3.00 for each
unit over 30.
Any rental payment not paid by Lessee within fifteen (15) days of the
due date thereof shall be subject to a late charge of 6%. In the event that
any rental installment to be paid hereunder remain unpaid after thirty (30) days
from its due date, Lessors may terminate this agreement and declare the
balance of the agreed rental immediately due and payable.
At the expiration of the term hereof, this agreement shall be extended
automatically for successive periods of one (1) year unless sooner termin-
ated by either party by written notice given at least thirty (30) days prior
to the expiration date hereof or of any successive yearly extmmsion hareof.
Lessors a~ree that they will not exercise their right to terminate this
agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date hereof excepv as other-
wise specifically provided herein or upon a showing of good cause.
The parties hereto further agree as follows:
Lessors agree to supply 117 volt AC single phase power to Lessee's equip-
merit ~n an amount not to exceed 500 watts. In no event, however, shall
Lessors be liable for any failure to supply power caused by forces beyond their
control.
Lessors agree to provide ouvside antenna mounting space on existing struc-
tures upon Lessee's request, provided that Lessee submit to Lessors a detailed
sketch showing point and method of fastening and overall height of antenna. No
new antenna shall be mounted nor any existing antenna changed without Lessors'
written permission.
Lessors agree to permit access at all raasonable times and upon reasonable
notice by Lessee or its authorized agent to install, inspect, maintain, repai.r
and otherwise service the facilities to be installed hereunder.
Lessors agree to take reasonable precautions to prevent unauthorized
persons from gaining access to communications equipmen~ installed hereunder.
Lessors disclaim any and all liability relating to the ~nm~allation,.
operation or failure of any communications equipment or antenna system erected
hereunder.
Lessee agrees~to pay all installments of rent when due.
Lessee agrees that the outside dimensions of the base station unit to be
366
11-19-7h
installed hereunder shall not exceed seventy (7Q) inches in height, twenty-five
(25) inches in width, and twenty-five (25) inches in depth, exclusive of struc-
tures to provide protection from outside weather.
Lessee appoints Piedmont Electronics Company, its authorized agent for
purposes of installing and servicing the said communications equipment in com-
pliance with regulations of the Federal Communications Commission.
Lessee agrees that, ~n the event it becomes necessary for Lessors to take
legal action to recover the agreed rental hereunder, Lessors may recover their
costs from Lessee including equipment removal costs, costs of suit and
reasonable attorneys~ fees.
It is understood and agreed by all parties hereto that J. Nelson Brown
shall be entitled to 100% of all rental payments made pursuant hereto for so
long as he shall retain his present interest in the Mountain House Farm
property.
The parties hereby agree and represent that this agreement constitutes
the entire understanding between them as to the subject matter hereof and that
all prior agreements, promises and representations are merged herein. This
agreement may only be modified in writing. This agreement is executed in
triplicate, each of which is equally authentic.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we set out respective hands and seals.
(signed) Ann Robins Haskell
(signed) J. Nelson Brown
(seal)
(seal)
ATTEST:
(signed) June T. Moon
Deputy Clerk
ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS
By(signed) Gordon L. Wheeler, Chairman
Report on all open Zoning Violations for period from January 1 to October 31,
1974 were presented to each Board member.
Re: V-74-09, Mr. Wheeler said the Louise Scott mobile home listed on the report
had been'moved to the location approved by the Board, SP-409
Re: V~74a55, Keswick Country Club was discu-ssed.
case is set for trial on January 21, 1975, and that
public restaurant until after the trials conclusion.
check be made by an inspector during the interval.
Mr. St. John stated that this
management would not open the
Mr. Wheeler suggested tha~some
Mr. Fisher questioned if any of the soil erosion cases have ever come to court.
Mrs. Miller answered yes, the case against LeRoy Snow is due vo come to court in
December. Warrant sworn on Dr. Hurt, Re: Barracks Farm and will be heard. The one
on the Rust Estates was checked, they have come into compliance, and no warrant was
issued. Ragged Ridge was heard on October 30, 1974 and continued. Tiffany case con-
tinued at his request.
No other discussion by the members of the Board. Mr. Wheeler noted a violation
by Black Industries (V-74-44). Mrs. Miller said she had spoken to a Mr. Brickle who
represented Black Industries. He said he would talk to Mr. Black since t..heir permit
was revoked, and they would have to reapply.
Mr. Wheeler also asked the Zoning inspectors to check out Sweeney's Auto Grave-
yard on Route 53. There is a new home being built across the road and he didn't know
if this was co~ered in the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Fisher felt this was a good way to keep Board members advised.
Request was brought before the Board to appoint a temporary Zoning Administrator,
while Mrs. Miller is on vacation or absent, someone can cover the position.
Mr. St. John Suggested that the title be ~Deputy Zoning Administrator" and not
11-19-72
temporary. Mr.
367
Robert Tucker, Assistant County Planner was suggested for the post.
Motion was offered by Mr. Carwile to appoint Mr. Robert Tu~ker as Deputy Zoning Ad-
ministrator. Motion was seconded by Mr. Thacker, and motion was carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, H~nley~ Thacker, Wheeler,andv~Wood~
NAYS: None°
Mr. Thacker offered motion that the name of Mrs. L. Gordon (Anne B.) Dorrier, Sr.
to replace Ms. Virginia Moore.
be submitted for appointment to the Library Board~ The term would begin immediately
and run through June 30, 1975. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood, and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler, and Wood~
NAYS: None~
Request was received from Region X Community Mental Health & Retardation Services
Board, asking that the Board concur with the following appointments: Mrs. Bettie
Kienast of Troy, Virginia representing Louisa County; Dr. Charles Perkins of Louisa,
Virginia, representing Louisa County; and Mrs. Mary Wetsel of Ruckersville, Virginia,
representing Greene County. These appointments would be effective January 1, 1974
for a period of three years expiring January 1, 1977. Mr. Wood made a motion to accep~
these people onto the Mental Health Board in concurrence with Mr. Hodous'~request,
and motion was seconded by Mr. Carwile and carried by the following vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler,~ood ~
NAYS: None~
Mr. Thacker offered motion to reappoint Mrs. T. Earl Wood to the Region X Com-
munity Mental Health and Retardation Services Board. The appointment would be for
a three year term vo expire December 31, 1977. This motion was seconded by Mr. Fisher
and motion was carried by the following recorded ~ote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile~ Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood~
NAYS: None.
Mr. Wheeler said the Board members must make appointments to ~he Solid Waste Board,
requesting three members be from the County, three from the City, and three from the
University. The following were suggested by Mr. Fisher, Wood and Wheeler.
Mr. Robert Bruce Hogue of Charlottesville
Mr. Preston A. Coiner, of Charlottesville
Mrs. Darlene L. (Jame~s) Samsell of Keswick
Mr. Wheeler suggested th~se names be put on the agenda for the December 19th
meeting, and he will speak to the oity.
Regarding appointments to the Housing Committee, Mr. Whee~er asked each member
for one name to be appointed to the Board. Names were submitted by Messes: Fisher,
Thacker, Wheeler and Carwile as follows:
Mrs. Kate S. (William) Sandusky, of Charlottesville
Mrs. Rosa B. Hudson, of Esmont
Mr. Earnly O. Chapman, of Keswick, Virginia
Mr. Jason I. Eckford, Jr., of Charlottesville
3 6
11-19-74
Mr. Wood and Mr. Henley did not submit names.
Mr. Wheeler suggested that the above four be appointed and that any others be
brought up at the December llth meeting. Mr. Thacker made motion to appoint the
above four persons. Motion was seconded by Mr. Carwile, and carried by the following
vole:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler, and Wood
None
Discussion of the last thing to be handled on the agenda~was adoption of a Pay
and Classification Plan for Albemarle County Employees, excluding school employees.
Mr. Wheeler pointed out that at the last meeting there were two motion~ one from
Mr. Fisher, and one from Mr. Thacker. There seemed Lo have been support for both
motions, so in order to resolve, Mr. Wheeler asked both these men work together~ and
develop a compromise. ~
Mr. Fisher reports at last meeting summation was presented~ There was concern
over the correctness of some of the figures originally submitted by the staff to
the Board of Supervisors, so Mr. Fisher went over them himself. In his review, and
also with the review done by the County Staff, some 18 figures have since changed
which would increase the Board proposal by some $16,000 instead of the previously
stated total of $5,000.
Mr. Fisher said he and Mr. Thacker met at the request of the Chairman to Lry and
arrive at a compromise they could both support. They felt that both the Public
Employment employees and the Sheriff's Office employees should be included in the adop-
tion of this plan and added to the cost so the total amount of the plan would be known.
Basically, under their compromise every employee received some increase and is put
on one of the steps of the consultantts proposal. This is not necessarily either the
step that vhe consultant's recommended or the one included in the Board's proposal
or proposal No. 4. Most of the controversy has centered around the higher salaried
employees. This compromise includes approximately a five percent increase rounded
off to the nearest step in the consultant's proposal. This, in conjunc.vion with the
five and one-half percent increase that was given ~ July would give a minimum of
about 10.8% for any employee this year and some-will receive much more. Mr. Fisher-
said although it can be argued that this is inflationary, he ~ willing to support
this compromise and he then offered motion to adopt a Classification and Pay Report
for Albemarle County E~ployees~ as prepared by Friesz, Lowe and Schroeder, and dated
August,. 1974., with certain salaries and classifications being adjusted by compromise
proposal No. 3~, implementation date to be November 1, 1974. The motion was seconded
by Mr. Thacker. He said he has been concerned that the Board's proposal did not cover
all employees and did nov establish a pay and classification plan. This compromise
does at least get everyone on the plan e~en though the classification part still needs
additional work. This will give the Board a basis from which to work.
Mr. Wood said he is still concerned that although an attempt has been maHe
to compromise~the compromise is "pretty blasted low". He felt Mr. Fisher is
confusing pay increases with positions and personalities and not looking at the overall
objective of the pay-classification plan or the job descriptions. He said a few
people are being penalized and at a very small cost to the County. Mr. Wood
did not think the implementation of this plan can be considered a pay increase.
He gave an example~ne salary which had been cut from $18,564 to $13~836. If a new
person has to be trained for that position~or if the salary must be brought
in line at a later date, this will be a pay increase and inflationary. He does
not want to go to the citizens with a 30% increase in salary in the next budget~
but feels this will be the result of this cut. Mr. Wood said the committee cut
the salaries of only five to eight people and for such a small amount of money
he did not feel it is worth the comprom~
just to have an unanimous vote and feels
adopt proposal #4. He said the Board is
to have consultants make a study of job
recommendations.
Mr. Henley said Mr. Wood had broug~
pay plan from the beginning. He support
can satisfy everyone.
Mr. Thacker said in arriving at the
singling out any particular member of t?
staff and wonders if the Board appreciat
deserves an increase. But, in arriving
amount of increase at five percent, too~
the five percent factor and then moved t
proposed salary schedule. This was not
employee. Mr. Carwile said in some case
the first step in the class. Mr. Thackc
classification steps, which may or may ~
in c.ertain circumstances~ the five pefco
salaries beyond Proposal No. 4. None of
No. 4, in most cases it is the same.
Mr. Wood agreed that the Board has
make sense to take part of the scale and
proposal and then try to decide for the
percentage of increase. The Pay-Classi£
It is based on the job descriptions of e
and not on individuals holding those pos
given a five percent increase and the ne
continuity of the plan is destroyed. He
se. He will not vote for the compromise
strongly that the Board should
defeating its objective when they asked
descriptions and do not follow the
.t out the reasons he was against the
s the compromise and did not feel the Board
compromise, there was no intention of
e staff. He said the County has an excellent
es the staff. He feels the entire staff
at this compromise they established a maximum
the Board's previous proposal~ applied
hat person to the nearest step on the
intended to reflect on any one individual
s, this compromise does not even reach
r said they did not consider the
ot have been a mistake. Mr. Fisher said
nt factor would have taken certain
the proposed salaries go beyond proposal
a fine staff, but felt that it does not
adopt salaries on the consultant's
remaining employees who deserves what
ication Plan is not based on that theory.
very job in the general county staff
itions. If one person is arbitrarily
xt one is moved to the next step t~he
felt implementation of the plan will be
less costly now, then to have the few poHt. ions which have been stricken, come back
for a tremendous pay increase at budget time next year.
Mr. Henley said Mr. Wood put himself in a box at the last meeting by saying
that he would not approve anything except merit increases.
Mr. Carwile said he had said that he would not support a plan for automatic
increases. This did not mean that the Board would not give a cost of living increase
regardless of whether anyone received a merit increase.
Mr. Wheeler said when the Board increases an employees pay check they have
given him an increase in pay regardless of whether the plan is implemented. To say
this is not a pay increase is not rational.
Mr. Fisher said the employee mentioned by Mr. Wood would have received a 95%
increase in salary over the past 15 months if the compromise had been predicated
on the consultant's proposal. The Board has already given that employee a 38%
increase over the past 12 months. The compromise proposal will be about 45% in
17 months and that is as much as he is willing to go along with.
Mr. Wood said he cannot support what has been said. He said the Board is
talking about personalities and that is what they have been trying to get away from.
He said the Board should deal with positions which is the purpose of this plan. There
is not a person on this Board who is qualified to make the analogy Mr. Fisher just
made and he disagrees.
The Chairman called for a vote at this time and the motion carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler.
NAYS: Mr. Carwile and Mr. Wood.
Mr. Batchelor said that County employees have long been paid in the lowest
25 percentile in this community. The adoption of this pay-classification plan
goes a long way in rectifying this situation and he is glad that a pay increase has
finally been given to all general county employees. There are some adjustments
that he hopes the Board will work on in the future.
Mr. Thacker note~ that there are still some inequities in the plan, but is not
completely finalized and he hoped that the Board will move toward correcting these
deficiences in the future. Everyone on the general county payroll has received
some increase and this is a basis on which to build an-'~effiaient~pay plan.
Claims against the County in the amount of $2,875,752.49 were presented,
examined, and allowed and certified to the Director of Finance for payment and
charged to the following funds:
General Fund
General Operating Fund
School Operating Fund
Cafeteria Fund
$1,327,071.57
372,381.19
864,742.60
iJ30~126.13
11-19-74
371
Textbook Rental Fund
General Operating-Capital Outlay Fund
School Construction-Capital Outlay Fund
Joint Security Complex Fund
Town of Scottsville: Local Sales Tax
Commonwealth of Virginia: Current Credit Account
Total
$ 7,116.49
71,124 52
66,291 75
136,014 85
192 90
690 49
$2,875,752 49
At 12:35 P.M. the Chairman~ requested a motion to adjourn this meeting
until 4:00 P.M. on December 11, 1974, in the Board Room of the County Office
Building. Motion to this effect was offered by Mr. Carwile, seconded by Mr.
Fisher and carried by the following recorded ~ote:
Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
None.
AYES:
NAYS:
Chairman