Loading...
1973-05-175-17-73 A regular, meeting at the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia was held on May 17, 1973 at 9:00 A.M. in the Board Room, County Office Building, Charlottesville, Virginia. .Pres~t: Messrs. Stuart F. Carwile, Gerald E. Fisher, J. T. Henley, J~. William C. Thacker, Jr., Gordon L. Wheeler and Lloyd F. Wood, Jr. Absent: None. Officers present: County Executive and County Attorney. The meeting ope~ned with The Lords Prayer led by Mr. Wheeler. On motion by Mr. Fisher, seconded by Mr. Thacker the minutes of March 28, 1973 were approved by the following recorded vote: AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS: None. The following communication was received from the Virginia Department of Highways.: "May 8, 1973 Board of' Supervisors of Albemarle County Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 Gentlemen: As requested in resolution by your Board on February 15, 1973, the following addition to Albemarle County is hereby approved, effective May 8, 1973. ADDITION LENGTH Extension of Route 826 from end of State maintenance 0.25 Mi. to 0.25 Mi. East. Sincerely, (Signed) J. E. Harwood, Deputy Commissioner,, The following communication was received from the Virginia Department of High- Wa~S~ ~ "May 11, 1973 Board of Supervisors Albemarle County 202 County Office Building Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 Routes 625 and 627 Hat,on and Warren Ferries Albemarle and Buckingham Counties Board of SUpervisors Buckingham County Buckingham, Virginia 23921 Gentlemen' I am pleased to enclose a copy of the resolution adopted by the State Highway Commission at its meeting on April 26, 1973 concerning the Hatton and Warren Ferries. I believe this resolution incorporates the desires of both counties, and I wish to thank you for the careful attention you have given this matter. The restoration of $~e Hatton Ferry will be handled by our Culpeper District, and our Distri~ti~E~ineer will advise you in the near future concerning this. Sincerely, and Chief J.E. Harwood, Deputy Commission~rEEngineer~ 5-17-73 Moved by Mr. Eakin , seconded by Mr. Glass that .... WHEREAS, rains from Hurricane Agnes which fell in the drainage basin of the James River caused a flood of record, the waters of which destroyed the facilities of the Warren Ferry on Route 627 and the Hatton Ferry on Route 625 between Albemarle and Buckingham Counties; and WHEREAS, this Commission, being of the opinion that the cost of operation and repairs of the Warren and Hatton Ferries was not commensurate with the public ser- vice being rendered, did at its meeting on July 20, I972, and in accordance with Section 33.1-150 of Article 2, Chapter 1, of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia, adopt a resolution setting forth its intent to discontinue portions of Route 627, including the Warren Ferry of in the ue~h , Albemarle an ' n i~ 0~20 mile of rea f ~n/~ucKlngnam' ~'~l~~h~aa~CSun~,t~ ~0~u :ml±e. o~ ,roaa anm at portion of ~.~ ~rtion erry ana ~urtner to azscontmn portionso~ Route 625, including the Hatton Ferry, in Albemar~ and Buckingham Counties, i.e. 0.07 mile of road and that portion of the ferry in Albemarle County, and 0.70 mile of road and that portion of the ferry in Buckingham County; and WHEREAS, certified copies of that resolution were sent to the Boards of Supervisors of Albemarle County and Buckingham County; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County requested that a public hearing be held to consider the proposed discontinuances; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held in the Scottsville Junior High School in the Town of Scottsville in Albemarle County at ~'30 P.M. on October 4, 1972; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Buckingham County by resolution of October 2, 1972 reaffirmed its resolution of March 4, 1968, in which it recommended that both the Warren Ferry and Hatton Ferry be discontinued due to the high cost of operation and limited public service; and WHEREAS, after further study and consultation, the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County adopted a resolution on March 28, 1973 requesting the Highway Commission to continue to maintain the existing access roads to both the Warren Ferry and the Hatton Ferry, with the Warren Landing site being utilized as an access point to the James River for recreational purposes and the County of Albemarle to further consider developing the Warren Landing site as a recreational site in the future, with the Warren Ferry itself being discontinued and the Hatton Ferry being reStored to operation by the Highway Department on a 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. basis Wednesday through Sunday of each week. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, in accordance with Section 33,1-150 of Article 2, Chapter 1, of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia, and in a spirit of cooperation with the desires of the Boards of Supervisors of Albemarle and Buckingham Counties, this Commission does concur in the recommendations of the Boards, i.e. to continue to maintain the access roads on Route 627 to the ~arren Ferry in both Albemarle and Buckingham Counties, and to discontinue maintenance and .opera- tion of the Warren Ferry; and further to continue to maintain the access road on Route 625 to the Hatton Ferry in both Albemarle and Buckingham Counties and to restore and continue to operate the Hatton Ferry on a 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. basis Wednesday through Sunday of each week,-with the total cost of operation of the Hatton Ferry being at the expense of Secondary road funds available for use within Albemarle County. Motion carried." Mr. Warner stated that the Highway Department is in the process of getting the materials together to rebuild the boat and will begin tomorrow to strip hard- ware from the old boat to get the new one under construction. It ~ill take a while to get the tower 2 cables, but they hope to have this ferry in operation within two months. Communication was received from the Department of Highways stating ~hat a location and design public hearing for Rou~e 20 would be held on May 29, 1973 at 7'30 P.M. on Stony Point School. This public hearing relates to Projects 0020-002-110,C501, B-603 and 0020-002-111, C-501, B-604 and 0020-002-109, C-501, B-602. This is for the purpose of considering the proposed construction of drainage structures and necessary approaches over Redbud, Foster, & Flannaghan Creeks. 5-17-73 A copy of the Virginia Department of Highways Secondary System Allocations for the fiscal year July 1, 1973-June 30, 1974 was received. Albemarle County's allocation being listed at $2,000,006. Mr. Batchelor stated that the County had recently joined with the City in an urban mass transit study. The County's share of this study will amount to $2,348 and he then requested that the Board adopt a resolution asking the Virginia Department of Highways to fund a portion of this amount. Motion to adopt the £ollowing resolution was offered by Mr. Carwile' WHEREAS, there is a nee~ ~or~:improiing and expanding existing public mass transportation in the Charlottesville-Albemarle urban area; and WHEREAS, a study regarding this matter will be undertaken by Kimley-Horn and Associates of Raleigh., North Carolina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by. the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that the Virginia Department of Highways are hereby requested to fund a portion of the County's share of this. project, this share being $2,348, if funds are available from sources other than secondary highways funds. The foregoing was seconded by Mr. Fishe~and carried by the following vote' AYES- Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS' None. Mr. Wheeler presented the following communication from the Virginia Department of Highways' "April 25, 1973 RE' Request for. Crossover To Serve Zion Baptist Church - Route 29 South Albemarle County Mr. Gordon L. Wheeler, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Keswick, Virginia 22947 Dear Mr. Wheeler' Mr. Warner has forwarded to me copies of your resolution passed at the March 21st meeting at which the Board requested that a crossover be provided on Route 29, south of Charlottesville to serve the Zion Baptist Church. I have had this request reviewed by our Traffic~Engineer and it is found that the location of the proposed crossover is not in accordance with our spacing requirements on this type of facility. You will note on the attached sketch that a crossover is provided on Route 29 at Route 775. By utilizing the secondary road church members should not be inconvenienced excessively. Mr. Warner has provided, in the 1972-73 budget, funds to improve Route 767 from 775 to past the entrance to the Zion Baptist Church. This work should be completed by late summer or early fall. Your interest and that of the Board in highway matters is very much appreciated. Yours very truly, D. B. Hope District Engineer" O-_l.'! -'t 13 Mr. Thacker stated that his committee met yesterday with Mr. Warner, Dr. Hurt and the developer of Whitewood Road. Dr. Hurt has suggested that he construct, at his own cost, Commonwealth Drive from the present Peyton Drive to Hydraulic Road, this to facilitate the reconstruction of Greenbrier Drive, Peyton Drive and a portion of Commonwealth Dr~ve to allow access into the surrounding apartment projects while these ~oads are being upgraded. He further proposed to pay 50% of the cost of up- grading that portion of Greenbrier Dr., Peyton Drive and Commonwealth Drive over to Stromberg-Carlson's rear entrance. He has provided Mr. Warner with plans so cost data can be drawn. In addition, Dr. Hurt has agreed, at his own expense to upgrade that portion of Greenbrier Drive from intersection with Peyton Drive to the intersection with Whitewood Road. At this point, do not have plans on Common- wealth Drive and Westfield Road. Mr. Thacker said he hoped that if cost estimates were ready by Wednesday thi~ ~h~dcbei~laced on the agenda and the Board could take action on Stromberg-Carlson's request for Industrial Access Funds. Mr. Thacker said that this was only a report and not a recommendation at this time. However, he did recommend that ~he resolution previously passed by this Board stay in effect until this matter is resolved. Mr. Henley requested Mr. Warner to fill in dips on Route 810 due to heavy equipment traffic. Mr. Carwile asked when the Highway Department would hold design review hearings on the interchange to be constructed at Barracks Road and the 29/250 by-pass. Mr. Warner replied that they are working on right of way acquisitions and there is a possibility that this might be developed this year and the Highway Department will have a hearing in the near future. Mr. Fisher again mentioned the traffic pattern from the new By-Pass ramp onto Route 250 West. Mr. Warner said that the traffic control engineer is investigating an answer to this problem. Mr. Fisher again inquired about Rt. 637. Mr. Warner replied that the Highway Department would be holding a public hearing on this matter around July 1, 1973. Mr-. Wheeler stated that Rt. ~16, or that portion between Rt. 22 and Interstate 64, is broken up almost to the dragging part for cars. Mr. Warner said he had included an amoun~ in his budget for rehabilitation of this road. Mr.-Wheeler also asked about Rt. 600 between Rt. 784 and Rt. 640. Mr. Warner said he was aware of the problem and is correcting. Mr. Warner said that the Highway Department has almos~ completed survey on Hydraulic Road and he hoped that in the next six weeks they will be able to look at the survey to see what effect this would have on the~a~ea from Rt. 29 to the Rock Store on 631. Mr. John Humphrey was present to give a report on a complaint about soil erosion in Camelot. He stated that in the early fall of 1972 a grading permit had been issued for a private road with seed, fertilizer and mulching on the 5-17-73 permit. In October he received a complaint about erosion and siltation from the newly graded road that was eroding into Section 1. This was investigated and the developer was informed of the problem and asked to correct same. The County Engineer was brought in. The Albemarle County Service Authority had to remove some sewer pipe which had been installed to prevent siltation going into this line and backing up into houses. Since last October they have been trying to~ correct the soil erosion problem and to have the road paved. There had been presentatio~before the County Court on this matter. Mr. Donny Woddson, County Zoning inspector stated that he, Steve Helvin, the developer's attorney and the assistant County Engineer had looked at the problem last Wednesday afternoon. Mr. Sims agreed to complete all seeding, to complete a portion of the property which is no longer under his control, but which has been damaged from his portion. He also agreed to build a diversion ditch to divert water from going into a street connection and across lawns. He has appeased some of those who have complained. The grading and seeding is satisfactory now. There are a few other items that should be completed and this will be checked-tater this afternoon. Mr. Jack Sims stated that all items agreed upon have been completed, however the land near Route 29 has no~ been owned by him for over five years. Mr. Wheeler asked Mr. Woodson to take one,last look. He stated that he has received a tremendous number of complaints about this problem during the last six months. Mr. Russell Moone¥ was present to speak to his complaint about soil erosion onto his property from the Hollymead development. Mr. Mooney stated that Dr. Hurt had called him yesterday and had agreed to do what was needed to lower the lake which has backed up onto his property. Dr. Hurt has also replaced the temporar~ debris basin which was washed/~nd~has agreed to clean out a ditch and 2eplace a fence. Dr. Hurt had asked for a continuation of this matter until this can be corrected. Mr. John Smart, Chairman of the Land Use Tax Study Committee was present. He requested that the Board set a date for hearing their report. Upon motion by Mr. Carwile, seconded by Mr. Thacker, the Clerk was ordered to advertise this for a public hearing on June 20, 1973 at 7:30 P.M. in the Courthouse. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler. NAYS: None. ABSENT: ~Mr. Wood. Mr. Smart then read the following communication: "The June 1972 issue of National Geographic demonstrated what a state-wide effort can do to end pollution in one of the large rivers of the State of Oregon. The Willamette River, which had become terribly polluted was changed in a period of ten years to a stream with 90 percent less waste discharge. This boosted overall water quality to meet strict state and federal standards~ 69 increased the number of migratory salmon, native trout and other game fish and made the river safe again for all water contact sports, including swimming. Not a beer can marred the setting. Montgomery County, Maryland, has demonstrated their ability to clean up one of their polluted s~reams. Orego~ has'shown that solid waste can be used for organic material for fertilizer and for feed for fish and animals. We also know that many European countries are using Solid waste for crop fertilizer. Agriculture did not become involved in conservation until about 1930. Prior to this date, most organi~ matter on farms was destroyed by fire. Many of our forests were burned to provide grazing for cattle. Had it not been for the change toward better conservation methods, our land would be non-productive today. ViSible to the contrary, there has been no effort ~oward conservation in industry and neither has there been much effor~ toward utilization of liquid and solid waste. Instead we shove these waste materials in holes, we spread them over the land, we pile them up, we burn them, we dump them in rivers and in the ocean or we just leave them scattered over our countryside. In the Wall Street Journal of May 9, 1973, appears a disturbing front page article about a decline in recycling materials. We find that companies are being subsidized for using virgin materials rather than using recycled materials. Rail ra~es for scrap steel, for instance, are $4.61 a ton while the rate for iron ore is only $1.84 per ton over comparable distances. The Executive Committee of the Albemarle County Farm Bureau has requested the Virginia Farm Bureau to make a study of solid waste disposal and the many variations being used, and why companies are being subsidized to use virgin materials over waste materials. We also want to know how to utilize these waste products for the benefit of all. We further recommend that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors appoint a Citizens Committee to explore the many methods of utilizing solid waste. We also recommend that the Board ask for the cooperation of the City o~ Charlottesville in this matter and they be given an opportunity to make appointments to this study commitzee. John A. Smart M. Y. Sutherland R. Bruce Hogue EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, ALBEMARLE COUNTY FARM BUREAU" He stated that they also have the support of the Civic League of Charlottes- ville-Albemarle County, the League of Women Voters, Citizens for Albemarle and the Charlottesville-Albemarle Council of Garden Clubs. Mr. Wheeler said that he had discussed the appointment of such a committee with the Mayor and representatives from the University of Virginia and possibly such a committee can be formed in the next thirty days. Mr. ~ohn Humphrey, County Planner, presented the following resolution adopted by the Planning Commission: WHEREAS, ~he Albemarle County Planning Commission is involved in preparing a revised Zoning Ordinance for Albemarle County to assist the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors in maintaining the integrity of the Comprehensive Plan and WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Planning Commission is meeting regularly on the preparation of growth guides and find that more time is needed to complete the preparation within ~he next six months and WHEREAS, a moratorium on Zoning Map Pe~ilions and Planned Unit~Develop- ments would provide the Commission with approximately 50% more time to give 'to the preparation and WHEREAS, the Commission is of the opinion that such a moratorium would be in the best interest of the general public welfare and safety and health relative to providing proper elements of growth guidance ?© THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Albemarle County Planning Commission recommends to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors that a six (6) month moratorium be placed upon the review and public hearings for ali Zoning Map Petitions and Planned Unit Developments, commencing midnite, May 14, 1973. The moratorium shall not apply to site plans or subdivisions of land and the Planning Office shall continue to receive Zoning Map Petitions and Planned Unit Development applications; however, no schedule shall be made until the removal of the moratorium. He also read the following letter from Dr. Avery Catlin, Chairman of the Planning Commission: "May 15, 1973 Mr. Gordon Wheeler, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County Office Building Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 Dear Gordon: The Planning Commission is sending the Board of Supervisors a recommend- ation for a six month moratorium on zoning permits and planned unit develop- menu special permits. This recommendation has the unanimous approval of the Planning Commission. We badly need more time to complete our Study of the new zoning ordinance and zoning map, and we find that we are making slow progress with so many concurrent requests for re-zoning. I do not believe I can ask the Planning Commission members to devote any more time to these studies and normal business than they are already devoting. We believe the moratorium provides the only solution to our problem and will give us an opportunity to complete our Studies and prepare a new zoning ordi- nance and zoning map. I urge you and the other members of the Board of Supervisors to accept and implement our recommendation. Sincerely, Avery Catlin, Chairman Albemarle COunty Planning Commission" Justifying the above request, Mr. Humphrey stated that due to the work load of the Planning Commission~ they had directed the staff to schedule only ten zoning cases for each first meeting in the month, however, for June they now have two meetings scheduled, plus one meeting for approval of site plans and subdivision plats. This leaves only one meeting in June for work on the new zoning ordinance. In July the agenda is already filled for public hearing purposes and he stated that this is an indication that zoning activities are increasing. They also have on file three applications for planned unite developments and these will be heard. If this moratorium is put into effect it would relieve the Planning Commission of approximately 50% of their time for work on the new zoning ordinance. Mr. Wheeler asked if the staff were in need of more time ~n order to pre- pare reports for the Planning Commission on the new ordinance. Mr. Humphrey replied that the moratorium would relieve the staff of approximately 10% of their work load in writing staff reports and will relieve the typists of quite a bit of work in typing staff reports and notification of adjoining property owners. 5-17-73 '~ Mr. Wheeler asked if it would help to bring in additional temporary help. Mr. Humphrey said he had nor investigated this possibility, however, if the Planning Commission speeds up their operation the volume would become so great as far as preparation is concerned that he might have to come buck to this Board with such a request. He also said that if the Board does not approve the moratorium, this becomes a greater possibility since the Planning staff has approximately 800 property owners to notify in connection with a public hearing to be held on the flood plain ordinance. Mr. Fisher sai~ it was his understanding that the Planning Commission felt this was the only way they would gain enough time to finish the new zoning ordinance in this current year and this ordinance had been in hand since late 1971. Mr. Wheeler inquired as to the amount of time needed for approval of site plans and subdivision plats. Mr. Humphrey said ~he time involved has been decreased since the appointment of a site plan technical committee to help with this review. Mr. Wheeler said there were many citizens in the county with knowledge of planning activities who would be willing to help and he felt this Board could appoint a separate-committee to review site plans and subdivisions. He asked Mr. HumPhrey's opinion. Mr. Humphrey stated that the Board would have to amend their ordinance to relieve the Planning Commission of this review process. Mr. Batchelor felt that if the Board did consider this, they might also include applications for mobile homes. Mr. Wheeler said that the Board should explore all possibilities since he felt the work load would continue to increase over the years. He then asked for comments from those citizens present. Mr. John Smart stated that the Farm Bureau supports a moratorium. Mr. Richard Speidel speaking for the Ivy Citizens Association stated that they support the Planning Commission's request. He said they are concerned about the orderly transition from the present zoning ordinance to the proposed zoning ordinance and the pressures of last minute decisions. Mr. H.Hk~.T~ffany, speaking for the Western Albemarle Taxpayers Association, stated that it might be-possible to curtail growth by enforcing a zoning moratorium for six months. However, it would give the Board an opportunity to investigate Mr. Fisher's proposal and the Wsstern Albemarle Taxpayers Association hoped by supporting a moratorium it would put The cost of growth on the proper people. Mr. Fisher said he did not believe it was the Planning Commission's intent to stop development since there are already sufficient zoned acres which could be developed during this Period. He asked Mr. Humphrey if this is the only method of freezing the zoning map so it could be worked on and if this would not have to be done sometime during preparation of the zoning ordinance. Mr Humphrey 5-17-73 replied ~hat~his wO~ld be necessary in order to have the map brough~up to date. Mrs. Elizabeth Rosenblum stated that the County has lived with what was essentially a packaged zoning ordinance for a lengthy time and she felt this was a good time to stop and see where we are going and she supported the Planning Commission's request. -She also stated that Citizens for Albemarle also supports the 'request. There were several unidentified people speaking for organizations such as: American Association of University Women, Albemarle-Charlottesville chapter of Zero Population Growth, Citizens for Ivy and the League of Women Voters who spoke in support of the Planning Commission's request. There was only one gentlemen speaking against the request, he also was un- identified. Mr. Wheeler asked Mr. St. John to speak to the legality of this request. Mr. St. John stated that the proposal before the Board was legal and could be adopted if based on a valid reason. The length of time requested did no~ seem to be arbitrary or unreasonably long. Mr. Thacker stated that his first observation was that perhaps the Board is asking the Planning Commission to do too-much work. He said there were two reasons given by the people speaking this morning, one to give the Planning Commission more time to complete their work on the new zoning ordinance and the second nor a curtailment of growth for six months. It was his feeling that if the ordinance is on the books it should either be administered or removed. Mr. St. John said that in reply to the point raised by Mr. Thacker on adminis- tration of the ordinance, there are two different'provisions before the Board. One applies to planned units developments which are in the existing ordinance. The other is a moratorium on applications to change an ordinance and these are two difference things. On planned unit developments, you are essentially~S~ppping some- one from doing what he has a right to do within the existing ordinance, but a moratorium on changes in the present ordinance is within the discretion of this Board. This does not seem to be the same, however, he did not feel that either is an abdication of the Board's duties when they put a moratorium on applications to change that ordinance. Mr. Wood asked Mr. St. John if he were referring to changing the text of the existing ordinance. Mr. ~St. John said no, he was referring to rezonings. Mr. Batchelor asked if he meant that this Board does not have the authority to put a moratorium on planned unit developments because they are administered under the present ordinance. Mr. St. John said he did believe that the Board has the authority to enforce a moratorium i£ they have a valid reason. To place a moratorium on planned unit developments which are ag-thori~d under the existing statute is s~opping for a certain period of time the administration of the law. This is no~ the same as placing a moratorium on people applying for a change in the zoning map. He felt the Board has the power to place a moratorium on both in given circumstances. Mr. Carwile said he had received the impression that by imposing a moratorium this would give a mechanism for orderly transition from the old zoning ordinance to the new zoning ordinance and the Board would not be flooded by rezoning re- quests to be heard under the old zoning ordinance, however, under the Planning Commission's request, applications for rezoning would still be permitted to be filed and any application so filed during this period would be heard under the old zoning ordinance. He felt the Planning Commission could possibly have two committees, one to work on rezoning requests and the other to work on the new zoning ordinance. The Board might relieve the Planning Commission of responsibility for site plans, special permits on trailers or subdivision ordinance controls. He prefered action be taken along these lines instead of a moratorium. Mr. Fisher said he had attended numerous Planning Commission meetings and he felt they were d6ing all this Board could ask of them in trying to administer ordinances that are now on the books and in working to adopt ones that will make their processes and the Boards more efficient. He felt the Planning Commission had requested this moratorium after much thought. He did not feel that this would stop development but would encourage utilization of land already zoned and he felt the Board should support this request. Mr. Fisher then offered motion to accept the recommendations of the Planning Commission as stated and for the reasons given. Motion was seconded by Mr. Carwile. Mr. Wheeler said he was about to suggest that this matter be deferred until the Board a~d the Planning Commission Could have an in-depth discussion of this request. Mr. Fisher said he would be willing to withdraw the motion if a time could be set for the meeting next week. Mr. Wood said he felt this was a serious problem, but he felt the request had come in the reverse and he would be willing to go along with the Chairman's re- quest for a meeting with the Planning Commission. Mr. Henley said he did not feel it was the intent of the Planning Commission to set a precedent and he did not feel their recommendation would be a hardship on anyone. He said the Board had discussed putting a time limit on building permits and asked what had happened to this request and if it~included in the new moning ordinance. Mr. Humphrey said yes it was and could be six months or a year. Mr. Carwile agreed with Mr. Henle[ and said he would like to see this made an amendment to the present zoning ordinance in the interim. Mr. Wheeler said there had been some discussion about certificates of occupancy and asked Mr. St. John what was being done about this matter. 73 5-17-73 Mr. St. John said this had come up in relation to a specific situation and ~his had been corrected, however, the zoning ordinance as written relating to certificateS of occupancy is perfectly good, even though he felt the require- ments of the ordinance are not being followed in all cases. Mr. Wheeler asked that the Planning Office give a warning that in the future this provision would be enforced. Mr. Henley said he felt the Planning Commission had fulfilled their duties in recommending this and he did not agree with Mr. Wood that the request had been presented in the reverse order. Mr. Wheeler stated that the Board will be meeting~on May 2~ and asked Mr. Humphrey if he could have the Planning Commission~at this meeting Mr. Fisher withdrew his motion. Mr. James Riopel, representing the newly formed Albemarle Recreation Associa- tion which encompasses most of the private recreational facilities in the County, said they f-eel that the present fees charged at Chris Green Lake endanger private facilities. He stated that some of these private facilities have been in business for over 25 years and this community cannot afford to lose these facilities. Last year Lake Reynovia had a decrease of 42% in swimming. He said there is considerable precedent for keeping fees for private and public facilities closer and he asked for fairer rates and also that owners with much experience be asked about future county facilities. Mr. Wheeler replied that this Board had appointed a committee to make a study of the parks system a~d ma~ a report to this Board, however, at the first meeting of this committee they said they will probably not have this report ready before September 1. Mr. Wood said he did not know about that motion and he had requested that the people involved be allowed input in the decision ~about the rate structure to be used. He felt the Board should address itself to this problem before the swimming season starts. Mr. Humphrey said that before Chris Greene opened last year there was verbal investigation made as to the effect this facility would have on Lake Reynovia. It had been reported to him that Lake Reynovia~4~ercrowded and needed the county's help with this overflow. When questioned as to where Mr. Humphrey had received his information that Lake Reynovia was overcrowded, he replied that it came fr~m Joe Goldsmith, who at that time was a county employee. Mr. Goldsmith said that the rates he had recommended to the County Executive were much higher than those adopted. Mrs. Rosenblum asked if there were any restrictions on rates since this facility was built with state funds. b-17-73 Mr. Wheeler said he reit the Citizens of Albemarle County had already paid for this facility and the fees charged are primarily for maintenance purposes only. Mr. Carwile recommended that any action be deferred until after this Board received a report from the Parks Committee. Mr. Henley said he would be glad to see the fees charged pay for the operation of the parks. Mr. Fisher said he thought it was the feeling of the Parks Committee that if more information were obtained they would reverse their decision. Mr. Wheeler directed that all owners of private facilities be invited to the Parks Committee meeting scheduledffor June 4, 1973. On motion by Mr. Wood, seconded~y Mr. ThackerI ~he Chairman was authorized to sign the following agreement: This agreement, made this //~ of ~ , 1973, by and between the Charl.6~e~i~e-Albemarle Airport Board, "Airport Board," party of the first part, and the County of Albemarle, "County," party of the second part,-and the Sheriff of Albemarle County, "Sheriff," party of the third part: WHEREAS, the Airport Board is the owner and operator of the Charlottes- ville-Albemarle Airport in Albemarle County, Virginia. WHEREAS, the FAA has passed certain regulations setting forth security regulations at airports, which regulations are set forth in Federal Aviation Regulations Part 121 and 107. WHEREAS, the County has agreed to hire and equip three new Deputy Sheriffs and to provide such additional equipment as may Be necessary for the Sheriff to undertake compliance with the aforesaid FAA regula- tions insofar as they apply to law enforcement officers, WHEREAS, the Sheriff has agreed to supply the necessary manpower and cooperation to comply with the FAA regulations insofar as they apply, under the following conditions: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR, paid by the Airport Board to the County and Sheriff, and in further consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth: A) The Sheriff hereby agrees and covenants to supply such manpower at such times as may be needed to perform the following duties: 1) Provide the law enforcement support as set forth in FAA Air Security Bulletin 72-2, copy made a part of this agreement, 2) Operate and maintain the crash fire rescue equipment in conjunction with the volunteer personnel on the airport. Deputy Sheriffs to be the principal operators and t~ainers for this equipment and ~o exercise primary control and responsibility. 3) Provide such parking and traffic control as may be necessary in the terminal area. 4) Undertake such walking patrols as necessary to effect security in the terminal, aircraft ramp, FBO and T-ha~gar areas, 5) Other duties that the Sheriff and the Airport Manager see as necessary. B) Such manpower to be supplied by the Sheriff shall be' 1) Assigned to the Airport as their sole duty, except as sickness or vacation necessitate fill-in by other deputies who will be assigned to the Airport as their sole duty for this period except in case of emergencies, provided that at no time shall there be less than one man on duty during the hours of air carrier operation, 2) Trained to the same degree by the County as other deputy §~ffs 5-17-73 not assigned ~o the airport. 3) Between the ages of 21 and 25, and same qualifications as Deputy II, 4) Under the control of the Airport Manager with the approval of the Sheriff, C) To enable the Sheriff to accomplish the above, the County hereby agrees: 1) TO hire three new deputy sheriffs who will become a part of the Albemarle County Sheriff's Department and to fully equip such deputies in the same manner as it customarily equips new deputies, with the exception of an automobile, 2) To pay such deputies according to the State salary scale, including all fringe benefits and insurance, 3) To provide such additional equipment and manpower as may be required by the Federal Aviation Administration, provided that the Airport Board shall first communicate such requirements to the Sheriff, and provided further that in the event that any such requirements shall increase the duties now imposed by the pre- sent regulations, the parties hereto shall re-negotiate the financial arrange- ments hereinafter set forth accordingly. D) The Airport Board hereby covenants and agrees to pay to the County such sums as may be expended by the County to accomplish the purposes of this agreement in accordance with the following schedules: 1) The Airport Board shall pay to the County within thirty days after billing, all costs incurred by the County for such costs as may be necessary to equip the deputy sheri£fs assigned to the Airport under the provisions hereof, 2) The Airport Board shall pay to the County, quarterly, the salaries of the regularly assigned deputies and fringe benefits, which sums shall be billed by the County on a quarterly basis, 3) The Airport Board agrees to pay tuition expense at Piedmont Community College for law enforcement and police science courses, and for specialized training such as fire ~ighting and rescue work, for the regularly assigned deputies, 4) The Airport Board will pay the salary expense for relief deputies while the regularly employed airport security officers are undergoing the 200-hour training course required by the Law Enforcement Officers Training Standards Commission. E) This agreement shall be binding on, and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto for a period of one year from the date hereof and shall be non-assignable by either party. This Agreement shall, however, be cancellable by both parties by mutual agreement, at any time. F) This agreement shall automatically be renewed at its expiration, unless prior to ninety days before the expiration date hereof, one or more parties hereto has given notice to the other parties of intent to terminate at expiration. Upon any such renewal, this agreement shall be renewed for another period of one year, and shall be renewed from year to year under the same terms as to cancellation and notice thereof. Pursuant to resolution duly adopted by the Board.of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, this agreement is executed for the County of Albemarle by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County. Pursuant to resolution duly adopted by the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Board, this agreement is executed for the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Board by the Chairman of the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Board. WITNESS the following signatures and seals, BY Cole Hendrix Chairman, Charlottesville- Albemarle Airport Board (SEAL) COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE BY Gordon L. 'Wheeler (SEAL) Chairman, Board of Supervisors, Albemarle County, Virginia BY George W. Bailey George Bailey, Sheriff of Albemarle County, Virginia (SEAL) 5-17 -73 .... The foregoing motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS: None. On motion by Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Thacker, the following ordinance was adopted; AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING AN AIRPORT PASSENGER SERVICE FEE OF PASSENGERS BOARDING AIRCRAFT AT · THE CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE AIRPORT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia' Section 1. The Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Board, in furtherance of its lawful duties to operate the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport and, pursuant to Section 58-76.2 of the Code of Virginia, ~hall on and after June 1, 1973, have the authority to charge a $1.00 passenger-service fee of all passengers boarding aircraft at the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport where the trip of such passenger originates at the Charlottesville~Albemarle Airport. Section 2. All such passenger-service fees collected by the Charlottesville -Albemarle Airport Board are hereby appropriated to the Board to use solely for airport-related purposes. Section 3. Any passenger who is required by the Ordinance to pay the passenger-service fee and fails to do so shall be ordered by the Airport police to leave the boarding area and upon failure To do so, said passenger shall be guilty of a misdeameanor. The foregoing motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler & Wood. NAYS- None. Upon motion by Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Carwile, the Chairman was authorized to sign the following agreement' In consideration of mutual agreements contained herein, the City of Charlottesville and the County of Albemarle hereby assign and transfer To the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Board all of their interest in and to a certain agreement dated September 21, 1972, with Eagle Aviation, Incorporated, successor in interest to Horizon Aviation, Incorporated in regard to the operation by such corporation as a fixed-base-operator at the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport. The Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Board hereby expressly assumes all obligations of the City and County under the foregoing agreement and covenants with Eagle Aviation, Incorporated, the City, and, the County to perform and discharge all obligations of such City and County under such agreement pursuant to paragraph 8 of such agreement. This assignment is subject to the prior written consent of Eagle Aviation, Incorporated. The foregoing mo~ion carried by the following recorded vote' AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS' None. RequeSt was received from the County Attorney asking that he be allowed to employ a student assistance for the summer at $3.50 an hour. Motion to grant this request was offered by Mr. Carwile, seconded by Mr. Wood and carried by the following recorded vote' AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS' None. 5-17-73 Mr. St. John stated that he had received a communication from Mr. Neil Alford, the legal advisor to the University, asking that a special dog warden be appointed for University grounds. He said the University had agreed to pay all costs connected with this appointment. Motion to defer this appointment until a name is furnished this Board was offered by Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Henley and carried by the following recorded vote' AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS' None. Mr. Wheeler said he had received a note from Lcdr. Paul E. Galanti thanking the Board for the Monticello plate which was given ~o him during the recent Dogwood Festival. Mr. Wheeler also stated that he had received the following letter from the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission' "4 May 1973 Dear Chairman Wheeler' .The Commission has authorized manufacture of metal plaques for all Registered Virginia Historic Landmarks. It gives me great pleasure to notify you that the first order is now ready for distribution. The 14" by 16" sign prepared for your property bears the Virginia seal and has the following text' "ALBEMARLE COUNTY COURT HOUSE HISTORIC DISTRICT has been registered as a Virginia Historic Landmark pursuant to the authority vested in the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission Act of~ 1966." We are pleased with the appearance of these markers and feel that this is an appropriate and dignified means of identifying Virginia~s rich store of Registered Landmarks. As soon as we receive a favorable reply on the'eh'closed card, your plaque will be sent with our compliments. If you have any questions about its placemenT, please do not hesitate to let us know. Sincerely yours, Junius R. Fishburne, Jr. Executive Director ~ Motion was offered by Thacker, seconded by Mr. Carwile to authorize the Chairman ~o sign for this plaque. Motion carried by the following recorded vote- AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS' None. At 12'10 P.M. the Chairman requested an executive session to discuss a legal matter. Motion to this effect was offered by Mr. Thacker, seconded by Mr. Woo'd and passed by the following recorded vote' AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS' None. The Board reconvened at 2'20 P.M. Mr. Ray B. Jones, Assistant Director of Finance and Mr. L.G. Dulaney were present to explain a request for a change in the accounting system for Albemarle County. Mr. Jones explained that because all revenue from local, state and federal sources is run through the General Revenue Fund it has caused a problem in relation to Revenue Sharing funds for Albemarle County and ~r~~d that,- 5-17-73 7¸9 the following resolution be adopted' WHEREAS, it appears that the County of Albemarle is being penalized as compared to other localities in the Commonwealth of Virginia in the distri- bution of federal revenue sharing funds due to the existence of the County General Revenue Fund; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the fiscal records of the County for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1973, be modified to reflect the consolidation of the General Revenue Fund and the General Operating Fund into one fund, to be designated the General fund, and thereafter all school revenues should be credited directly to the School Fund; and FURTHERMORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the fiscal records of the County for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1973, be modified to reflect the con- solidation of the Dog Tax Fund into~the General Fund. Motion to adopt the foregoing resolution was offered by Mr. Carwile, seconded by Mr. Thacker and carried by the following recorded vote- AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler. NAYS' None. ABSENT- Mr. Wood. Mr. Jones also requested approval of the following resolution' BE IT RESOLVED, that all reports on County operations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1973, be prepared to reflect the consolitation of the General Revenue Fund and the General Operating Fund into one fund, to be designated the General Fund; and AYES' NAYS- ABSENT' BE IT RESOLVED that school revenues be shown as being credited directly to the School fund; and FURTHERMORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the fiscal records for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1973, of the county be audited to show the consolidation of the Dog Tax Fund into the General Fund. ~ Motion was offered by Mr. Carwile to adopt the foregoing resolution subject to approval of the Sta~e Auditor. Motion was seconded by Mr. Fisher and carried by the following recorded vote-! Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler. None. Mr. Wood. Upon motion by Mr. Carwile, seconded by Mr. Thacker, L.G. Dulaney was re- tained as auditor for the- 1972-73 County audit. Motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler. NAYS' None. ABSENT' Mr. Wood. In line with a request from Ronny W. Dower and William N. Whitehead, Mr. Thacker offered motion to adopt the following resolution: 5-17-73 BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby request the City of Charlottesville to join with them in £orming a combined Emergency Service Office. Motion was seconded by Mr. Carwile and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheele~ None. Mr. Wood. Following adoption of the foregoing resolution, motion was offered by Mr. Fisher to appoint the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors as~'i. Director and the County Executive as Deputy Director of this Emergency Service Office for the County of Albemarle. Motion was seconded by Mr. Thacker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler. NAYS: None. ABSENT: Mr. Wood. Mr. Wheeler announced that July 11, 1973 at 7:30 P.M. in the Courthouse would be advertised as the hearing date for flood plain lines in connection with the flood plain ordinance. He also announced that the next work session on the amended Subdivision Or- dinance would be held on June 20, 1973, at 4:00 P.M. in the Board Room. Upon motion by Mr. Carwile, seconded by Mr. Thacker, the following resolution was adopted: BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors that the following sums of money be, and the same hereby are, appropriated from the General Revenue Fund and transferred to the School Operating Fund for the following purposed: AYES: NAYS: 17..1-135.3 17.2-136.7 17 3-314.23 17 8-600.5 17 8-600.5 17 61-215.1 17 8-6OO. 5 17 2-136.9 17 1-134.51 17 3-220 17 7-210 Psychometrist's Salary Firemen's Training Program Library Funds-State and Federal Business Education Distributive Education Home Economics Vocational Agriculture Apprenticeship Training Program Driver Education Travel of Vocational Personnel Insurance Rebate $5,932.50 522.00 2,700.00 484.67 2,261.73 793.36 2,947.76 660.00 2,400.00 1,704.00 7,351.25 AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following sums of money be trans- ferred from code 17.17-800 to the following codes: 17.17-200 E.S.E.A. Title VI 2,950.00 17.17-1230 E.S.E.A. Title VI 150.00 The foregoing motion carried by the following_recorded vo~e: Messrs: Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler. None. ABSENT: Mr. Wood. 5-17-73 81 On motion by Mr. Henley, seconded by Mr. Fisher, Mr. E.L. Sutherland was allowed $240.00 from the Dog Tax Fund for two (2)/~wes, two (2) young ewes and ten (10) lambs killed by dogs. Motion carried by the following recorded vote' AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler. NAYS' None. ABSENT: Mr. Wood. On motion by Mr. Henley, seconded by Mr. Fisher, Barboursville Farms, E. William Hess, was allowed $80.00 from the Dog Tax Fund for two (2) ewes killed by dogs. Motion carried by the following recorded vote' and AYES' Messrs' Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker,/Wheeler NAYS' None. ABSENT' Mr. Wood. On motion by Mr. Henley, seconded by Mr. Fisher, 'Mr. Thomas D. Wetsel was allowed $565.00 from the Dog Tax Fund for one (1) cow and one (1) calf killed by dogs. Motion carried by the following recorded vote' AYES- Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler.and Wood. NAYS' None. Statements of expenses of the Department of Finance, the Sheriff's Office and the Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney were submitted, for the month of April, 1973. On motion by Mr. Carwile, seconded by Mr. Thacker, these statements were approved by ~he following recorded vote' AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler. NAYS- None. ABSENT: Mr. Wood. Statement of expenses incurred in the maintenance of the County Jail was submitted along with summary statement of prisoner days for the month of April, 1973. Claim of the Jail Physician was submitted for the month of April, 1973, in the amount of $42.00, of which two-thirds is reimbursable by the State. On these statements motion by Mr. Thacker,/were approved for payment by the following recorded vote' AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler. NAYS' None. ABSENT' Mr. Wood. Repor~ of the County Executive was submitted for the month of April, 1973, as information. Reports of the Department of Public Welfare were submitted for the month of March, 1973, in accordance with Sections 63-67.1 and 63-67.2 of the Code of Virginia. Appointments to the Albemarl~ County Service Authority, the~.~Planning Commission, the Community Action Organization and a Library Site Selection Committee were ordered carried over To May '23. Appointment to the Library Board was ordered carried over to June 21, 1973. - 5-17-73 '82 On motion of Mr~ Wood, W.A. Pace, Jr., and J.D. Johnson were reappointed to new three year terms as members of the Welfare Board. These ret. ms expire on June 30, 1976. Motion was seconded by Mr. Henley and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS: None. Motion was offered by Mr. Carwile to adopt the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia does hereby lay the County levy for the year 1973 for General County Purposes of Five Dollars and Ninety Cents ($5.90) on every One Hundred Dollars worth of assessed value of real estate and personal property, and ordered that the Director of Finance of the County of Albemarle assess and collect on all taxable real estate and all taxable personal property, including machinery and tools not assessed as real estate, used or employed in a manufacturing business, not ~axable by the State on Capital; including Public Service Corporation property (except the rolling stock of railroads) based upon the assessment fixed by the State Corporation Commission and certified by it to the Board of Supervisors both as to location and valuation; and including all boats and watercraft under five tons as set forth in the Code of Virginia; and all vehicles used as mobile homes or of£ices as set forth in the Virginia Code; excluding merchant's capital, farm machinery, farm tools, farm livestock, and household goods as set forth in the Code of Virginia, Sections 58-829 and 58-829.1. FURTHER, the Director of Finance shall make separate classifications of farm machinery, farm tools and farm livestock. City, to make working drawings for renovation of the Levy Opera. House. seconded by Mr. Thacker and carried by the following recorded vote' Mr. Carwile's motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and carried by the following re- corded vo~e' AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker,'Wheeler and Wood. NAYS' None. The next item under discussion was a request to proceed with the Annual A~ropriation. Ordinance. After a short discussion it was ordered that $1,000.00 be taken from the Thomas Jefferson Planning district dues and transferred to the Highway Safety Commission. It w~s ordered that appropriation for the Industrial Commission be left in the budget estimate at this time. Vote was taken on an appropriation of $4,000.00 for the Madison Hall Volunteers. The vote was as follows' AYES- Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS' Mr. Henley and Mr. Thacker. Mr. Carwile gave a short report from the Committee appointed to study restricted roads. Mr. Clarence McClure was present ~o state that the proposed $45,000.00 deduction from the 1973-74 school budge~ would not hurt any programs. In light of this statement, motion was offered by Mr. Wood to approve ~his deduction when preparing the Annual Appropriation Ordinance. Motion was seconded by Mr. Carwile and carried by the following recorded vote' AYES' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Ren~y, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. NAYS: None. Mr. Carwile offered motion to authorize retaining an architect jointly with the Motion was AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, HenLey, Thacker and Wheeler. NAYS: None. ABSENT: Mr. Wood. Resolutions requesting Board approval for loans from the Literary Fund were ordered carried over to June 13, 1973. Mr. Wheeler announced that a public hearing on the tri-party agreement of the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority will be set during the first week in June. At 4:10 P.M. the Chairman requested an executive session to discuss personnel matters. Motion to this effect was offered by Mr. Carwile, seconded by Mr. Fisher and passed by the following recorded vote; AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, 'Thacker and Wheeler. NAYS: None. ABSENT: Mr. Wood. The Board reconvened at 4:20 P.M. Mr. Wheeler announced that the following salaries had been set for the 1973-74 fiscal year: Clerk of the Circuit Court, $14,500; Sheriff, $14,500; for the Common- wealth's Attorney the County will match on a 50-50 basis, subject to Compensation BOard approval, any amount up to $17,500; County Executive, $26,500. The $1,500 increase may be paid into a retirement plan. Motion was then offered by Mr. Carwile to proceed with drawing the Annual Appropriation Ordinance with the corrections as noted above. Motion was seconded by Mr, Thacker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, and Wheeler. NAYS: None. ABSENT: Mr. Wood Mr. St. John said he had received a letter from Mr. Harry Marshall, attorney for Mr. George Cason asking that public hearing before the Planning Commission on Mr. Cason's petition to operate a sanitary landfill on Route 20 North be passed. He asked the Board's advice. After a short discussion Mr. Carwile offered the following motion: 83 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia that SP- 273 is referred to the Albemarle County Planning Commission for their study and recommendations; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Albemarle County Planning Commission is direct~to hold an advertised public hearing on this petition. Mr. Carwile's motion was seconded by Mr. Thacker and carried by the following recorded vote' AYES- Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker and Wheeler. NAYS' None. ABSENT' Mr. Wood. Motion was offered by Mr. Thacker, seconded by Mr. Fisher, to adjourn this meeting until 3'00 P.M. on May 23, 1973 in the Board Room of the County Office Building. AYE S ' NAYS · 5-17-73 Molion carried by the following recorded vote' Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood. None. Chairman