1972-07-26N230
A regular meeting of the Board of County Supervisors was held en July 26~
1972~ at 7:30 P.M. in the Albemarle County Court House~ Charlottesville, Virginia.
Present: Messrs. Stuart F. Carwile~ Gerald E. Fisher~ J. T. Henley~ Jr.~
William C. Thacker~ Gordon L. Wheeler and Lloyd F. Woed~ Jr.
Absent: None.
Officers present: County Executive and County Attorney.
The Chairman called for ~ublic hearings on the following ~
zoning requests as
advertised in the Daily Progress on July 13 and July 20~ 1972.
(1) ~MP-~b. W. I. Mawyer. The Chairman announced that this petition would
not be heard this hight as the Planning Commission had not acted on same.
(2) ZMP-229. Lester R. Terry, Charles S. Terry and Lester B. Terry. To
rezone ~?.1 acres from A-1 Agriculture to RS-1 Residential. Property is
situated on north side of Route 649~ across from "Jefferson Village
Subdivision." Property is described as Tax Map 3.2, Parcel 2~ and 2~D.
Rivanna Magisterial Distz~ct.
Mr. Humphrey stated that R-I zoning exists across Route 649 which is developing
as "Jefferson Village." The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the "North
Rivanna Cluster" should be terminated in the general area of this request. It
indicates that the RS-1 category with its maximum density of one. (1) dwelling
unit per acre would be considered for the parcel. The granting of this request
would be parallel to the recent rezoning in the same area. However to go much
beyond the ridge of the "Cluster'~ in this area~ in the staff's opinion could
prove to be an error in the future. Public services could only be provided by
pumping operation when it becomes available to the entire North Rivanna area.
The applicants proposed to use County public water as opposed to well. This is
good. Septic tanks will have to be utilized indefinitely. He ~lso stated
that the request can be generally in cem~liance with the "Plan" with all-things
considered. ~e not~ that this rezoning if granted should be the dividing line
from urban type density and large lots developing. Any further disruption of
this area outside the watershe~ will be detrimental to the ecology and the
habitat of wildlife in this watershed which is generally known as the "Preddy
Creek Watershea.~ Mr. Charles Terry was present in support of the petiti~u~
No one spo~e in opposition. Mr. Humphrey stated that the Planning Commission
had recommended unanimous approval of the petition. Mr. Wood offered motion
to approve as recommended by the Planning Commission. Motion was seconded
~y~sMr. Henley and passed by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile~ Fisher~ Henley~ Thacker~ Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None.
(3) SP-181. Evelyn C. Cassell. To locate a permanent mobile home on 4.98
acres located east of Route 618 near the Fluvanna County line in southeast
Albemarle County. Property is described as County Tax Map 116~ Parcel 4
(Dart thereof), Scottsville Magisterial District.
Mrs. Cassell was present. No one appeared in opposition. Mr. Humphrey stated
that the Planning Staff recommended Health Department approval of a septic
system-and a 100 ft. setback from all property lines. He stated that the
Planning Commission had unanimously recommended approval with the conditions stated.
231
Mr. Thacker offered motion to approve as recommended by the Planning Staff and
the Planning Commission. Motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and carried by the-
following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile~ Fisher, Henley~ Thacker~ Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS:
None.
SP-184. Boar's Head Club~ Inc. To locate a swim and tennis club on 6.0 acres
situated on the south side of Route 2~0 West on land known as "Greencroft."
Property is described as County Tax Map ~8, Parcel 91A and~91B (part thereof),
Samuel Miller Magisterial District.
Mr. Gerald Tremblay was present on behalf of the petitioners.
Mr. Humphrey stzted
that the staff found the site plan in order~ however~ the staff would suggest a
deacceleration lan~ at the entrance to the facility, where very minimal grading
is required. He also stated that the Planning Commission had made a field inspection
of the site and have recommended approval with the following condit2ons. This ~pDroval
was by unanimous vote of those members present.
CONDITIONS: As recommended by the Planning ~ommission.
1)
No outside music, amplifiers, or loud speakers are to be used in the
operation of the facility.
2)
That subdued lighting be utilized in all outside.areas and around the
prime building to the satisfaction of the County Planner.
3) Strict compliance with the site plan as filed with the petition.
That a deacceleration lane be installed to the satisfaction of the
Virginia Department of Highways and 'that inVestiEation be made by
the Highway Department for the need for lane markin~a for left turn
movements and any other marking necessary for the safety of traffic
in the area.
That the access road be restricted to the membership and service of
of the Boar's~Hea;d Club~ .Inc.
6)
That the entrance road at Route 2~0 be raised syfficiently to brin'g
it to the level of Route 2~0 a sufficient length to improve the sight
distance at this intersection..
Mr. Humphrey stated that since the Planning Commission hearing he had received the
following letter from the Department of Highways in reference to Condition No. 4:
"July 26~ 1972
Mr. John Humphrey
County Planner
County Office Building
Charlottesville, Virginia
22901
Dear Mr. Humphrey:
On Friday, July 21, 1972, Mr. J.'W. Nicholson~ District Traffic Engineer and I
reviewed the entrance at Greencroft with Mr. Bill Bascom. The GreenCroft property~
I understand~ ~s the future site of the Boar.'s Head Club.
We recommended to Mr. Bascom that the existing entrance be raised to provide a
better connection to Route 2~0-. He. indicated this Was to be done. At this time it is
hard to determine what effect this turning traffic will have on the throughmovement
in the area. We recommended that nothing be done at this time' to the existing payement
markings. After the club is in operation we will study the traffic patternS~ If a
need for changes then exists we will do what we can to help with the problem.
As you'know th'is is one of two passing lanes on 2~0 between 'the Albemarle Playhouse
and Ivy he~ding west. To provide left turn slots at Greencroft would mean dO{ng away
with any passing zone in this area since the remaining sections Would not allow adequate
distance for passing.
Mr. Bascom indicated that traffic from the west entering the site would be slight.
If this is the case a deceleration: land would not be necessary at'this time. You should~
however, reserve the right to require a deceleration lane at a later date if traffic
movements so warrant.
232
If I can be of further assistance,-please advise.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) R. O. Warner
Resident Engineer"
Mr. Humphrey then read'the following letter into the re~erd:
"July ~0, 1972
Albemarle County Planning Commission
County. Office Building
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
In re: Special Use Permit~- Boar,s Head
Club - Greencroft
Dear Mr. Chairman and memebers of the Commission:
Subsequent to the meeting with you with regard to obtaining a Special
Use Rermit to operate the Boar's Head Club at Greencroft in Albemarl~ County,
the Board of Director's of the Club had a meeting and authorized me to write
this letter to you.
I am very happy that the Commission has taken its time to become informed
with respect to the property which will be used as club facilities and also to
observe the distances of the neighboring properties to the proposed club
facilities.
It is the inten$ion of the Boar's Head Club Board to operate a private,
social and recreational club with eating facilities~ recreational facilities~.
i.e. swimming and tennis,and an ABC cI~b~lic~nse.
The main complaint we heard from four of the land owners in the area
concerned principally lighting and the possibility or'noise.
This is to advise that any lighting installed at the club and parking
areas, or along the roadway wilI be directed toward the club facilities and
no lighting will be directed toward adjoining properties'.
No noises or sounds made on the club facilities will be of-such nature as
to interfere with the reasonable enjoyment of the Surrounding properties.
I am submitting an enlargement from the U.S. Geologic Sur'vey of the area
showing Greencroft and the relative location of the surrounding properties.
Using the proposed club facilities as a center~ circles have been projected
outwardly from the club facilities which are spaced at one-tenth of one mile
intervals~ ~It appears that the Harper property, which is the closest to' the
facilities, is in excess of .lg miles away.
The Directors of the Boar's Head Club intend to operate a first class
facility for the enjoyment of~ its members, the majority of whom reside in western
Albemarle County.
Thank you for your time and effort spent on this Special Use 'oPermit and we
sincerely hope ~that you will give it favorable recommendation to the Board of
Supervisors.
Very truly yours,
Signed (E. Gerald Tremblay)"
~t this time, the Chairman called on the public for discussion. Mr. & Mrs.-
Michael Harper and Mr. Albert D. Groh, adjoining property owners spoke in
opposition~ citing noise as their main o~jection. Mr. Jack Taggard an adjoining
property owner spoke in favor. There were approximately 3~-40 people present
who rose to indicate they were in favor of the petition. After lengthy discussion
by the Board it was the general consensus of opinion that condition #5 was
unnecessary. Mr. Fisher then offered motion to approve with conditions 1, 2, 3,
4 (to be amended to "has right reserved to require deacceleration lane if recommended
by the Highway Department), 6 and with the following'added conditions:
1) This permit is to be issued only to the Boar's Head Club, Inc., for the purposes
'2'33
of operating a dining and minor sports recreationaT-facility for use"by- permanent
members and member-accompanied guests only.
2) ~ATION. This permit shall remain in effect for an indefinite periOd~ unless
in the considered opinion of the COunty Planner and, the Planning Commission of
Albemarle County~ there has been a substantial change in the operation of this Cluby
which change causes a detrimental effect on the m~pUblic safetyy healthy or general
welfare of the citizens of Albemarle County. In such an eventy this permit shall
be null and void ninety (90) days follOwing notification by Registered Mail of at
least one official of the Club.
3) EXPANSION. Any expansion of land area for the use of this CSub will necessitate
application for a new permit for the entire operationy and this'~'rmit,m.~will become
null and void upon the granting of a new permit.
This motion did not receive a second. Mr. Wood then offered motion to approve the
application withtthe following conditions:
1)
2)
No outside activities past 1:OO A.M.
That this permit be limited to this particular Boar's Head Club as its articles
of incorporation are now set up.
That subdued lighting be utilized in all outside areas and around the prime
building to the satisfaction of the CoUnty Planner.
Strict compliance with the site plan-as filed with~the~petition.
That a deacceleration lane and lane markfngs for left turn movements'and any
other marking necessary for the safety of traffic in this area be left to the
discretion of.the~Virginia Department~of Highways as per their letter-addressed
to Mr. John Humphreyy County Plannery under date of ~uly 26y 1972, If at
some future date~ the Virginia~Department~of Highways deema this to"be necessaryy
same will be installed by the Boar's Head Cluby Inc.
6) That the entrance road at Route 2~O be raised sufficiently to bring it io the
level of Route-2~0 a Sufficient length b~ improve the sight distance at this
intersection.
Motion was seconded by Mr. Thacker amd passed by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Messrs.~ Henleyy Thackery Wheeler and Wood,.
Mr. Fisher.
ABSTAINING: Mr. Carwile.(Mr. Carwile did not participate in any of the discussion-
concerning this petition).
After the vote was. takeny discussion followed, in which Mr.'Wheeler Stated that ~e
not
had/intended to vote for condition #1 as stated above~ but rather for "no activities
past I:OO.A.M.~,' He the~ asked~that the Vote be ,reconsidered,. Mr. FiShsr made a
motion to reconsider the action taken, motion was seconded by Henley and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Fishery Henley~ ~hd,,.'Whmee~er.
NAYS: Messrs. Thacker and Wood.
ABSTAINING: Mr. Carwile.
Another discussion followed
on this condition.
Mr. Wood then amended his motion to
read that "ALL ACTIVITIES STOP AT 1:00 A.M," Mr. Thacker agreed to the amendment
and seconded this motion. This passed by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Henleyy Thackery Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: Mr. Fisher.
ABSTAINING: Mr. Carwile.
(53
SP-18~. ~Kenneth G. Maupin. To expand an existing General Store. Property is
situated on west side of Route 29 North just south of the intersection of Route 29
North and Route 649. Property is described as CoUnty Tax Map 32~ Parcel 43~ Char-
lottesville Magisterial District.
234
Mr. Humphrey stated the Staff had recommended that parking spaces be marked
for convenience and to prevent congestion on the lot. They were also desirous
in hav~ng a deacceleration lane~ however, there is not sufficient land frontage
of~.the ownership of the store to,accommodate the deacceleration lane. The
staff had recommended that the Planning Commission Site Plan~,~Coordinating
Committee review the site plan as a condition Of approval. Mr. Humphrey stated
that after the committee had visited the site and made their report that the
Planning Commission had unanimously approved this petition subject to the
following condition:
1) Marked parking spaces on site for 21 vehicles.
2) Highway Department approval.
3) Health Department approval of a septic tank ~ystem.
H~ also stated that the Commission had instructed the Secretary to investigate
with the Board of Supervisors and-the Highway Department the possi~bility of
closing off the median cut in Route 29 North for northbound traffic access to
the facility to eliminate the safety hazard that exists there. Mr. Maupin was
present in support of the petition. Mfs.Mary Jo Lovelace spoke stating that
she felt approval of this petition without requiring the deacceleration lane
would be a hazard for south-bound traffic in this area. AFter considerable
discussion~ Mr. Wood offered metion to approve application for special permit
subject to delineation of parking spaces as recommended by the Planning Commision~
approval of septic tank system by the Health Department and the matter pertaining
to deacceleration lane and closing of median cu~ in Route 29 North be left to
the discretion of the Highway'Department. Motion was seconded by Mr. Henley and
passed by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. ~arwile~ Fi,sher~ Henley~ Thacker~ Wheeler and Wood. ~
NAYS: None.
The Chairman called an end t.o the public hearings on zoning matters, and
the following items were discus~sed.
Mr. Batchelor stated that a committee composed of Mr. Gerald E. Fisher~
Mr. William C. Thacker~ Jr.~ Mr. John Humphrey and himself had met to discuss
the Master plan for the City's Pen Park. They gave a lengthy report and' stated~
that they recommended the following conditior~a,~
1) The City grant a reservation for future alignment of Meadow Creek
Road between Redte 29 and Rio Road which traverses northern
~ extension of this property and to be described by the County PlannerY
2) That the City grant a general easement te the County or the Rivanna ~
Jurisdictional Water and Sewer Authority for the location of future
pump line which is to traverse and parallel the Rivanna River.
Discussion followed as to how the City planned to upgrade Route 768 which is the
entrance road to the park. Mr. Francis Fife and Mr. Tom Cenger were present on
behalf of the City. Mr. Conger stated that the County could apply for Virginia
Outdoor ~Recreation Funds for this purpose. Mr. Wheeler stated that he could not
~up~ort thins petition under these circumstances since the County~badly needed these
funds for the several county parks which are now in operation. Mr. Carwile then
offered motion tO accept the recommendations of the committee and to add that
"the City agrees to acquire a 50-ft. right of way and to install 22-feet of
asphalt pavement, according to State specifications, ~ithou~ the use of Secondary
Highway Funds or Virginia Outdoor Recreation Funds." Motion was seconded by
Mr. Thacker and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley~ Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None.
In reference to a complaint from Mr. Joseph J. Farinholt, adjoining property
owner, Hollymead School site, Mr. Humphrey stated that this had been investigated
by the zoning administrato~ and the damage was being cleared.
Mr. Joseph Goldsmith was present to tell the Boazd that on Monday, Mr. Horace C.
Miller, Sr., property owner of land adjacent to Chris Greene Lake, had disrupted
tree cover on this land. Mr. Goldsmith felt that this was a serious threat
to the lake and had Soil Conservation Service investigate this.
from their engineer:
Following is letter
"July 26~ 1972
Mr. Joseph M. Gol~i~h, Ac~ing Director
Parks & Recreation
Albemarle County, Va.
Dear Mr. Goldsmith:
Pursuant to our investigation of the land adjoining Chris Greene Lake which you
and I made this morning at your request~ the following information is submitted.
The parcel of land-which is now being cleared is definitely considered to be a
potential erosion problem and a source of pollution to Chris Greene Lake unless
protective measures are taken. Since I have not discussed the situation with
the land owner I am not sure what his intentions are, but I do recommend that
some erosion prevention measure be implemented.
If further land clearing operations are~continued, I would highly recommend
that a silt basin be installed in the draw leading to the lake and that all
runoff water be diverted into the silt basin. I would suggest that the basin
be located below the woods line and above the lake, This would probably be best
as an excavated pit with an earthen dam on the lower side with a perforated pipe
as recommended in the Albemarle County Soil' Erosion Handbook (See page 38-~6).
The area cleared should be seeded to a mixture as recommended on page 17 of
the haddhook.
If we can be of further assistance, please contact Mr. Ro O. Anderson of our
Albemarle County Office.
Sincerely,
(Signed) H. Tillman Marshall
Area Engineer"
Mr. Goldsmith explained that after checking with the C~ty Attorney, warrants had
been issued to Mr. Miller and his son for violation of the soil erosion ordinance,
however, these warrants will probably be dismissed if Mr. Miller declares this
clearing as an agriculture operation since this is not covered in the soil erosion
ordinance. The County Attorney advised the Board that the only immediate action
that could be taken~ would be to seek a court injunction against Mr. Miller.
Mr. Carwile offered motion to authorize the County Attorney to seek
a temporary court injunction against Horace C. Miller, Sr. Motion was seconded
by Mr. Thacker and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile, Fisher, Henley, Thacker, Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None.
Mr. '~neeler asked Mr. Humphrey and Mr. Goldsmith to contact the Virginia
Department of Outdoor Recreation representative in Richmond to fiz~d~if funds
would be available to acquire a buffer zone for additional property development.~
Report on the'operation of the county parks and recreation was presented
as information.
The following certificate certifying the destruction of bonds and coupons
was presented as £nformation.
CERTIFICATE AS TO DESTRUCTION
,, o? ONDS COUPONS ,,,
The undersigned having been appointed to a committee of three persons
to supervise and witness the destruction of bonds and coupons in accord with
resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, adopted
June l~, 1972 pursuant to the provisions of Virginia Code Section ~8-919.3, do
hereby certify that we did on July 1W, 1972 supervise and witness the
destruction of the bonds~and coupons Ils~ed~. on the attached Exhibit "A", which
exhibit has been duly initialled by each ~f us. Said bonds and coupons were
destroyed by fire. The total amount of bonds destroyed-was $$70,00Oo00 and the
total of the coupons $1~9,$10.~0, making a total of~des~royed bonds and
coupons of $629,~10.50.
The issue,~ series, number and maturity date of the paid bonds
and coupons is set forth on the attached Exhibit "A".
Witness the following signatures and seals this 20th day of July,
1972:
(Signed)
(Signed)
(Signed)
Margot Hornblower
Ray Cary
Thomas M. Batchelor, Jr.,
Director of Finance
Albemarle County, Virginia
BOND
NUMBERS
ISSUE: CROZET SANITARY DIST. RICT.- .$150,000.
SERIES: 1947 t2-1-47)
FISCAL
MATURITY YEAR COUPON
~ DATE .... PAID . · NUMBERS
4t~-45 5,000. O0 2-1- 5'8 6-30-58
46-50
5 ~ 000. O0
10,000.00
51-60
2-1-59 6-30-59
2-1-60 6-30-60
61-70 10,000.00 2~1-61 6-30-61
10,000.00
71-80
81-90
101-1~O
10~000.00
10,000.00
~o,ooo.o6
2-1-62 6-30-62
2-1-63 6-30-~3
2-1-65 6-30-65
71-80 87.50
~i~86-90 43.75
96-100 43.75
111-12o 87.5o
131-140 87.5'0
41-70 262.50
81-85 g3- 75
91-15o 525. oo
71-80 8 7.5.0
86-9o 43.75
)+6-15'0 918.75
N6-70 218.75'
81-85 43.75.
91-15'0 5~5. oo
71-80 87.5o
86-90 43.75
51-15,O 875. OO
51-70 175.00
81-85 ¥3.75
91-15'o 5'2~.oo
71-80 87.50
86-90 43.75.
61-15'0 787.5'0
61-150 787.5.0
71-150 700. O0
71-150 700. OO
81-150 612.50
81-150 612.50
101-15,o 437.5o
lOl-150 437; ~0
9,975.00
MATURITY
. DATE,
8-1-57
8-1-57
8-1-57
8-1-57
2-1,-58
2-1-5'8
2-1-~8
2-1-5'8
2-1-5,8
8-1-58
2-1-5'9
2-1-59
2-1-5,9
2-1-59
2-1-5,9
8-1-5,9
2-1-60
2-1-60
2-1-60
2-1-60
2-1-60
8-1-60
2-1-61
8-1-61
2-1-62
8-1-62
-i-63
-1-6N
2-1-65'
FISCAL
YEAR
.PAID
6-30-58
6-30-5'8
6-30-58
6-30-5.8
6-30-58
6-30-5.8
6-30-5,8
6-30-5,8
6-30-59
6-30-59
6-30-59
6-30-5'9
6-30-59
6-30-59
6-30-60
6-30-6.0
6-3o-60
6-30-60
6-30-60
6-3o-6o
6-30-61
6-30-61~
6-30-61
6-30-61
6~0-62
6-30-62
6-3O-63
6-30-63
6-30-65'
6-30-65
BOND
11-1
16-20
.26-30
31-35
36-~+0
46-50
5,000. O0
5,OO0.00
~000..00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000-.00
~,000.00
335,000.00
ISSUE: CROZET
SERIES: 195g
MATURITY
,DAT. E.
12-1-57
12-I-58
12-1-60
12-1-61
12-1-62
12-1-64
SANITARY
FISCAL
YEAR
PAID
6-30-58
6-30-59
6-30-60
6-30-61
6-30-62
6-30-63
6-30-65
DISTRICT -
(12-1-~)
COUPON
NUMBERS
ll-lO0
16-1OO
16-1OO
21-100
21-1OO
26-1OO
26-100
31-100
31-1OO
36-100
36-100
41-lO0
g6-100
$100,000.
FISCAL
MATURITY YEAR
. AMT,, .,, . DATE PAID
1,305.00 12-1-57 6-30-58
1,232.50 6-1-58 6-30-58
1,232.50 12-1-58 6-30-59
1,160.00 6-1-59 6-30-59
1,160.O0 12-1-%9 6-30-60
1,087.50 6-1-60 6-30-60
1,O87.50 12-1-60 6530-61
1~015.00 1-1-61 6-30-61
!~O15.OO 12-1-61 6-30-61
9~2.50 6-1-62 6-30-62
992.%0 12-1-62 6-30-62
870.00 6-1-63 6-30-63
797.50- 12-1-6~ 6-30-65
13,8¥7.50
ISSUE: ALB.
SERIES: 1950
BOND MATURITY
NUM'~, ERS AMT. DAT~, ,,
176-200 25,000.00 1-1-58
201-225 25,000.00 1-1-59
226r250 25,000.00 l-l-60
251-275 25,000.00 1-1-61
276-300 25,000.00 ~-1-62
301-325 25,000.00 1-1-63
351-375
25,000.. Q9 1-1-65
175,000.00
CO. SCHOOL BOARD -$500,000.
(1-1-5o)
PAID
6.30-58
6-30-59
6-30-60
6~3'0-61
6-30-62
6-30-63
6-30-65
COUPON
NUMBERS
FISCAL
t~LTURITY YEAR
AMT... DATE . PAID ....
2,¥37.50 1-1-58 6-30-58
2,250.00 7-1-58 6-30-59
2,250.00 1-1-59 6-30-59
2,062.50 7-1-59 6-30-60
2,062.5,0 1-1-60 6-3Q-60
1,875,~00 7-1-60 6.30-61
1,875.00 1-1-61 6-30-61
1,687.50 7-1-61 6-30-62
1,687.5o 1-1-62 6-30-62
1,500.00 7-1-62 6-30-63
1,500.00 1-1-63 6-30-63
1,125.00 7-1-6~+ 6-30-65
1.125.00 1-1-65 6-30-65
23, b~37.50
176-500
2Ol-5OO
201-500
226-500
226-5'00
25'1-5'00
25'1-5'oo
276-500
276-500
3Ol-5OO
301- 500
351-5'oo
351-5oo
BOND
Nm~Rs
1-35
36-70
71-1o5
1%1-175
ISSUE: ALB. CO. SCHOOL BO~ - $700,000.
SERIES: 1960 (5-1-60)'
FISCAL
MATURITY YEAR
DATE PAID
35,000o00 5-1-61 6-30-61
35,~000. O0 5-1-62 6-30-62
35,000.00 5-1-63 6-30-63
140~000o00
6-30-65
COUPON
NLTMBERS,,. AMT.
1-700 11,900.O0
1-700 11,900.00
36-700 11,305.00
36-~20 6,5~+5.00
446-700 4,335.00
421-4~5 42 5. oo
71- 700 10,710. O0
71-700 10,710.00
506=525 340. O0
141-420 $,760.00
446-5'23 1,326.00
525-700 2,992.00
141-380 ~,080.00
386-~2o 595.oo
~46-W9o 765.00
W96-5o5 17o.oo
526-610 !,~gS.00
616-625 170.00
631-700 ~i~190..00
85,663.00
MATURITY
FISCAL
YEAR
PAID
11-1-60
5-1-61
11-1-61
5-1-62
5-1-62
11-1-62
5-1-63
:;5-1-64
1i-1-64
11-1-64
11-1-6~
5-1-65
5-1-65
5-1-65
5-1-65
5-1-65
6-30-61
6r30-61
6-3O-62
6-30-62
6-30-62
6-30-63
6-30-63
6-30-63
6-30-65
6-30~6~
6-30-65
6-30-65
6-30-65
6-3~-65
6-30-65
6-30-65
6-30-65
6-30-65
6-30-65
241
ISSUE:
1961 (6-1-61)
1-20.'
+60
Atff. DATE PAID
20,000.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
60,000.00
6-1 -62
6-1-63
6-1-64.
6-3e-62
6-3o-63
6-3o-65
COUPON
NIBERERS
1-3oo
1-3oo
21-300
21-27O
281-300
4-1-28o
61-3oo
4,875.00 12-1-61
4,875.00 6-t-62
~,550.00 12-1-62
4,062.50 6-1-63
325.00 6-1-63
3,900.00 ~6~=64
3,900.00 12-1-64
26,4-87.50
FI SCAL
YEAR
PAID
6-30-62
6-30-62
6-30-63
6-30-6~
V
6'30-6~
6-30 -65
242
Mr. Humphrey was instructed to send to the Board members a copy of
report on permits issued for the Month of JuA~ 1972
At 10:45 P.M. the Chairman entertained a motion to adjourn into executive
session to discuss litigation with the County Attorney. Motion was offered
by Mr. Thacker~ seconded by Mr. Carwile and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Messrs. Carwile~ Fisher, Henley, Thacker~ Wheeler and Wood.
NAYS: None.
The Board reconvened.
ing
Claims agains~t/~he. County.-amo~,.~to $9~7~979.05 were presented, examined
and allowed and certified to the Director of Finance for payment and charged
against the following funds:
General Revenue Fund:
General Operating
School Operating
Cafeterias
Virginia ~blic Assistance
Capital Outlay
Dog Tax Fund
Textbook Rental Fund
Town of Scotts~ille-Local Sales Tax
Commonwealth of Virginia:
Current Credit Account
$ 35.33
1 71,731.63
3oF,858.o2
527. ~ 7
80,633.20
271,7~+1.65
1,2~0. ¥8
1,41 9. ~5
1,)+9.56
124~ 642.46
On motion~ the meeting adjourned.
Chairman