Loading...
1966-10-20 A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA~ WAS HELD AT THE OFFICE BUILDING OF SAID COUNTY ON THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1966. PRESENT: MESSRSo EDGAR N. GARNETT, GARRETT Wo KIRKSEY~ GEORGE C, PALMER~ 11, F. E. PAULETT, ROBERT THRAVES AND R. A. YANCEYo ABSENTt NONE. COUNTY EXECUTIVE~ ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT AND COMMONWEALTHIS OFFICERS PRESENTt ATTORNEY, MITTED. THE MEETING OPENED WITH THE LORDtS PRAYER LED BY MR. GARNETT. MINUTES OF THE MEETINGS OF SEPTEMBER~ 15 AND OCTOBER 6~ 19(3~) WERE APPROVED AS SUB- COMMUNICATIONS WERE PRESENTED FROM THE CHESAPEAKE AND 0HIO RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS CONCERNING PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDING ACROSS ROUTE ~0 TO PROVIDE RAIL SERVICE FOR THE MORTON FROZEN FOODS PLANT LOCATED dUST EAST OF CROZET~ VIR- GINIA. IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT MORTON'S REQUEST FOR THIS SIDING HAD BEEN DIRECTED TO THE RICHMOND OFFICE OF THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT AND HAD BEEN GIVEN APPROVAL SUBUEOT TO CONCURRENCE BY THIS BOARD. CONSIDERABLE CONCERN WAS EXPRESSED REGARDING THE CROSSING ON A PRIMARY ROAD. MR. GARNETT STATED THAT THE FIRE COMPANY WAS CONCERNED ABOUT SWITCHING DURING FIRES. ~EPRE- SENTATIVES FROM MORTON'S AND ~ ADVISED THAT THERE WOULD BE ONLY ONE SWITCH PER DAY AND THIS WOULD OCCUR ABOUT 6=~0 Ao~, AFTER MUCH DISCUSSION~ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED BY MR. PALMER, SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY~ AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, THAT APPROVAL IS HEREBY GIVEN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GRADE CROSSING ON ROUTE ~0 AT THE PLANT OF MORTON FROZEN FOODS AT CROZET~ VIRGINIAt IN ACCOR- DANCE WITH REQUEST RECEIVED FROM THE ~ORTON FROZEN FOOD 0OMPANY AND THE CHESA- PEAKE AND 0HIO RAILWAY COMPANY, APPROVED BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS. ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER, SECONDED BY ~R. KIRKSEY~ IT WAS ORDERED THAT LETTERS BE DIRECTED TO MR. BUTLER OF THE CHESAPEAKE AND 0HIO RAILWAY COMPANY~ REQUESTING SURVEY OF NEED FOR RAILWAY CROSSING SIGNALS AT WEST LEIGH AND KESWICK. MR. GARNETT REQUESTED THAT MR. PALMER TAKE THE CHAIR IN ORDER THAT HE MAY PROPOSE A MOTION° MR, GARNETTIS MOTION~ WHICH WAI SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, OFFERED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS BE AND IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO MAKE ANOTHER STUDY WITH REGARD TO IMPROVEMENTS TO ROUTE 2~0 IN THE 0ROZET, VIRGINIA~ AREA. PETITION WAS PRESENTED BY MR. WALTER YOUNG REQUESTING INCLUSION INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS ROAD BEGINNING AT ROUTE 690 AND CONTINUING TO 0 & 0 RAILWAY~ AND ON MOTION OF MR. YANCEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PALMER, WAS OR~RED HELD FOR ROAD VIEWERS WHEN THEY ARE NEXT APPOINTED, COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ADVISING THAT tN REPLY TO LETTER FROM THIS ~OARD REQUESTING SOME ALLEVIATION OF THE HAZARD AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTES 20 AND ~26~ THEIR MAINTENANCE FORCES HAVE REMOVED A LARGE TREE AND TRIMMED THE HEDGE AT THIS INTERSECTION IN THE HOPE THAT THIS WOULD IMPROVE THE SITUATION CONSIDERABLY. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM TH/ DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ADVISING THAT ENTRANCES TO THE COUNTYiS NEW SCHOOLS WERE BEING PROCESSED FOR ACCEPTANCE INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ADVISING THAT AS RE- qUESTED BY RESOLUTION OF THIS BOARD ON dULY 28~ 1966~ SAID DEPARTMENT HAD ACCEPTED INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM ROAD FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 712~ O.C)0 MILE SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN RAILROAD TO 0.20 MILE NORTHEAST TO DEAD END~ EFFECTIVE SEPTEBBER 13~ 1966o THE FOLLOWING PLATS WERE PRESENTED~ (1) 3.02 ACRE TRACT ON ROUTE 53 NEAR SIMEON OWNED BY H. m. PIPPIN, AS PREPARED BY 0. Ro RANDOLPH AND APPROVED BY THE PiTY AND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONS~ (2) 0.~) ACRE TRACT ON ROUTE 660 NEAR EARLYSVILLE OWNED BY PANARAMA CORPORATION~ AS PSEPARED BY B. AUBREY HUFFMAN AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. ON MOTION OF MIR. PAULETT~ SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY~ THE FOREGOING PLATS WERE APPROVED AND THE CRAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD. THE FOLLOWING LETTER WAS PRESENTED TO MR. 0TIS L. BROWN AND ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER~ SECONDED BY MR o KIRKSEY~ WAS ORDERED SPREAD IN THE MINUTES OF THIS MEETING: eMR. 0TIS Lo BROWN~ COUNTY EXECUTIVE 0OUNTY OFFICE BUILDING CHARLOTTESVILLE~ VIRGINIA DEAR OTIS: ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE) THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WISHES TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS TO YOU ITS APPRECIATION FOR THE SERVICE YOU HAVE RENDERED THE COUNTY AS COUNTY EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR OF FINANOEo ',.~ You HAVE SHOWN SINCERE ENTHUSIASM IN THE FURTHERANCE OF MANY PROdECTS DURING YOUR TENURE FOR WHICH YOU WILL LONG BE REMEMBERE~, NOT ONLY BY THE COUNTY'S GOVERNING BODY BUT BY ITS CITIZENS. ~E MENTION PARTICULARLY OUR NEW WATERSHED PROdECTS, RECREATIONAL FA01LITIES AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ALBE- MARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY° ~E REALIZE THAT YOU SPENT MANY HOURS OF YOUR OWN TIME IN AN EAGER EFFORT TO MAKE THESE PROdECTS A REALITY. COMMENTS FROM EMPLOYEES OF THE COUNTY AND FROM CITIZENS OF THE COMMUNITY CE ALBEMARLE AND CHARLOTTESVILLE HAVE BEEN WARM AND COMPLIMENTARY) WHICH HAVE INDEE~ BEEN GRA~IFYINGo ~E FEEL THAT ALBEMARLE COUNTY IS LOSING A YOUNG AND TALENTED LEADER. YOU WILL BE MISSED BY MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD, BY YOUR EMPLOYEES AN~ BY THE CITIZENS OF OUR COUNTY. HOWEVER) WE LOOK FORWARD TO THE BENEFITS OF YOUR EFFORTS AND SERVICE AT THE STATE LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT. AS YOU GO ON TO A NEW FIELD OF GOVERNMENT AND NEW DUTIES, IT tS OUR SINCERE WISH THAT YOU MAY HAVE ALL THE SUCCESS AND HAPPINESS POSSIBLE. (SI dUNE T. ~OON, CLERK $tNCERELY~ ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS EDGAR N. GARNETT~ CHAIRMAN GARRETT ~o KIRKSEY GEORGE C. PALMER~ Ii F. E. PAULETT ROBERT THRAVES R; A. YANCEY" RESOLUTION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REQUESTING THAT THIS bARD ENACT A BUILDING CODE AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE DATE, SEVERAL REPRESENTATIVE~OF THE CHAMBER APPEARED IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST, THIS MATTER WAS GIVEN CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION AFTER WHICH MOTION WAS OFFERED BY MR o KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR, YANCEY~ AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED~ ORDERING THAT THIS MATTER BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER DOCKET AND DIRECTING THAT MR, THOMAS Mo BATCHELOR BE REQUESTE~ TO SUGGEST THE TYPE ORDINANCE DESIRABLE FOR THE COUNTY, STATEMENTS OF EXPENSES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE~ THE SHERIFFIS OFFICE AND THE OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTHIS ATTORNEY WERE PRESENTED FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER~ ~C~6, ON MOTION OF MR, KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MRo YANCEY~ THESE STATEMENTS WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED, STATEMENT OF EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THE COUNTY JAIL WAS SUBMITTED ALONG WITH SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PRISONER DAYS FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER~ 19~, ON MOTION OF? ~R, PAULETT~ SECONDE~ BY ~Ro YANCEY~ THESE STATEMENTS WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED, REPORT WAS RECEIVED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ~ELFARE AND INSTUTION$ ON INSPECTION OF THE COUNTY JAIL AND WAS ORDERED FILED, CLAIM OF THE JAIL PHYSICIAN IN THE AMOUNT OF ~?,00 WAS PRESENTED AND ON ~OTION OF MR, PAULETT~ SECONDED BY MR, YANCEY~ WAS APPROVED FOR PAYMENT, ~INANCIAL REPORT ON STATE-LOCAL HOSPITALIZATION WAS RECEIVED FROM DR, STURKIE FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, CLAIM OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HOSPITAL IN THE AMOUNT OF ~1~652.62 WAS SUBMITTED FOR HOSPITALIZATION OF INDIGENT PATIENTS UNDER SHE AND ON MOT*ION OF MRo YANCEY~ SECONDED BY ~, KIRKSEY~ WAS APPROVE~ FOR PAYMENT, REPORT OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER~ 1~6~ WAS PRESENTED AND ORDERED FILED, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION~ THE TREASURY BOARD OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA~ AS ADOPTED BY THAT BOARD ON OCTOBER ~ 1~6~ WAS RECEIVED= "BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TREASURY BOARD OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA: PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 15.1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA AND THE RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE.VIRGINIA SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM HERETOFORE ADOPTED ON THE ELEVEN~a DAY OF JULY 1966, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 51-111.2~(~) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA OF 1950~ THE VIRGINIA SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM SHALL PURCHASE NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND (~C)00~000) SCHOOL BON~S OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA~ AT PAR AND ACCRUED INTEREST, 2, SAID BONDS SHALL BE IN COUPON FORM WITHOUT FROVlSION FOR REGISTRATION, 3, THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON SAID BON~$ SHALL BE PAYABLE AT STATE PLANTERS BANK OF COMMERCE AND TRUSTS~ ~C HMOND~ VIRGINIA~ OR~ AT THE OPTION OF THE HOLDER THEREOF~ AT THE NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY~ CHARLOTTESVILLE~ VIRGINIA. ~ SAID BONDS SHALL BE DATED NOVEMBER 1~ lC~ SHALL BE IN THE DENOMINATION OF ~000 EACH~ SHALL BE NUMBERED FROM 1 TO 1~0~ INCLUSIVE~ SHALL BEAR INTEREST RATE OF ~,10% PER ANNUM; PAYABLE SEMI-ANNUALLY MAY 1 AND NOVEMBER 1~ AND SHALL MATURE IN NUMERICAL ORDER ~50,000 BONDS OF NOVEMBER 1~ IN EACH OF THE YEARS 1968 TO 1985~ INCLUSIVE. 5. UNLESS THE EXECUTED BONDS SHALL BE DELIVERED OR TENDER OF DELIVERY SHALL BE MADE TO THE VIRGINIA SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OR ITS AUTHORIZED AGENT WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS RESOLUTION~ THE TREASURY BOARD SHALE HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF WITHDRAWING THE PROPOSAL CONTAINED HEREIN. 6, ALL RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH ARE HEREBY REPEALED. ?, THIS RESOLUTION SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.~ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION OF THE SCHOOL BOARD~ AS ADOPTED BY THAT BOARD ON' OCTOBER 13~ 1966~ WAS ALSO RECEIVED: "BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA= 1. THE RESOLUTION OF THE TREASURY BOARD OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, ADOPTED ON THE 6TH DAY OF 0CTOBER~ 1966, CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MARKED EXHIBIT Ar IS HEREBY AGREED TO IN ALL RESPECTS AND THE NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS (~O/00~000.00) IN SCHOOL BONDS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ REFERRED TO IN SAID RESOLUTION~ SHALL BE ISSUED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION, 2. A CERTIFIED COPY OFTHIS RESOLUTION~ HAVING A CERTIFIED COPY OF SAID RESO- LUTION OF THE TREASURY BOARD OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA ATTACHED~ SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY FOR ITS APPROVAL, 3o THIS RESOLUTION SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.~ AFTER RECEIVING THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIONS FROM THE TREASURY BOARD AND THE SCHOOL BOARD~ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED BY ~Ro KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY ~Ro YANCEY~ AND A~OPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE: AYES: ~R. EDGAR N, GARNETT, CHAIRMAN ~R. GARRETT ~, KIRKSEY MR, GEORGE Co PA~MER~ II BR. F, Eo PAULETT ~R. ~OBERT THRAVES MR, R, A. YANCEY NAYS: NONE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1. THE RESOLUTION OF THE 0OUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ALBEMARLE 0OUNTY~ VIRGINIA~ A~3OPTED ON THE I~TH DAY OF 0CTOBER~ 196~ CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO~ AND THE RESOLUTION OF THE TREASURY BOARD OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA~ ASOPTED ON THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER~ lC~6, CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH RESOLUTION OF SAID TREASURY BOARD IS ATTACHED TO THE CERTIFIED COPY OF SAI~ RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL ~K~ARD~ ARE HEREBY APPROVED IN ALL RESPECTS~ AND THE ISSUANCE OF THE ~000~O00 SCHOOL BONDS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA~ IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF SUCH RESOLUTIONS~ IS HEREBY APPROVED. ~o ALL RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH ARE HEREBY REPEALED. THIS RESOLUTION SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY, BOURNE WAYLAND OF THE SOiL AND WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE APPEARED AND PRESENTED THE FOLLOWING WATERSHED STUDY: ~As YOUR SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION SUPERVISOR IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ ~ FEEL IT iS MY OBLIGATION TO INFORM YOU OF THE CRITICAL NEEDS CONCERNING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION OF OUR WATER RESOURCES. FOR THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS~ WE HAVE HAD A SEVEREr PROLONGED DROUGHT. {T HAS CAUSED CROP FAILURES FOR THE FARMERS. HOMEOWNERS HAVE SEEN THEIR WELLS GO DRY, WATER RESTRICTIONS HAVE BEEN ENFORCED BY COMMUNITIES TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE WATER FOR DOMESTIC USES, FORTUNATELY, THE MUCH NEEDED RAINS CAME TO OUR RESCUE IN SEPTEMBER. OUR GROUND-- WATER AQUIFERS HAVE BEEN RECHARGED TEMPORARILY. RUNOFF EVEN CAUSED SCATTERED FLOODING PROBLEMS IN THE COUNTY. BUT THIS DOES NOT MEAN OUR PROBLEMS ARE OVER. YOUR COUNTY E~OARD OF SUPERVISORS ARE KEENLY AWARE OF THIS. THEY KNOW WE MUST HAVE AN ADEQUATE PROGRAM FOR THE CONSERVATION OF WATER FOR THE PEOPLE AND INDUSTRIES ALREADY LOCATED HERE. THEY ALSO REALIZE THAT WATER IS A VITALLY IMPORTANT FACTOR IN THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF RAPIDLY DEVELOPING ALBEMARLE COUNTY. WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT, THEY HAVE DONE SOMETHING ABOUT IT. RECENTLY, THEY REQUESTED THAT THE THOMAS dEFFERS~N SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT MAKE A WATERSHED RESOURCE STUDY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE ENGINEERS DIVIDED THE COUNTY INTO WATERSHED AREAS, DAM SITES WERE SELECTED ON THE BASIS OF POTENTIAL FOR FLOOD PREVENTION, WATER SUPPLY AND RECREATION. THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE, OTIS BROWN, FURNISHED INFORMATION ON PRESENT WATER NEEDS AND FUTURE GROWTH AREAS IN THE COUNTY FOR THE STUDY, FROM THIS OVERALL STUDY, THE SUPERVISORS HAVE SELECTED SlX WATER-- SHEDS TO BE STUDIED FURTHER. THEY ARE= TTIER~-- THIS WATERSHED HAS EXCELLENT PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND FOR WATER SUPPLY USE BY THE TOWN OF SCOTTSVILLE. PRESENTLY, THE TOWN HAS OUTGROWN ITS ANTIQUATED SYSTEM, HOWEVER, THE ENTIRE COST OF THIS PROdECT MUST BE BORNE BY THE COUNTY. BECAUSE OF ITS PRIXIMITY TO THE dAMES RIVER, THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ECONOMIC UUSTIFtCATION TO SPONSOR A PROdECT WITH SMALL WATERSHED FUNDS (PL-$66). BECAUSE OF ITS PROXIMITY TO THE RIVANNA RIVER THIS HOL]:3~TRUE ON THE SITE AT EARLYBVILLE ALSO. .STOCKT_O_t- CREEL - THIS WATERSHED IS LOCATED IN THE WESTERN PART OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY AND DRAINS THE SOUTH-EASTERN SLOPE OF THE ~LUE RIDGE TO ROCKFISH GAP. THIS IS VERY FINE SOURCE OF WATER THAT BLENDS ITSELF NICELY IN WITH THE PRESENT BEAVER CREEK WATERSHED AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT IS TAKING PLACE IN THAT AREA.' A 150 ACRE LAKE PROVIDING 3.22? ACRE FEET OF WATER (1,0~8,?75.000 GALS,) COULD BE CONSTRUCTED HERE. THIS PROdECT COULD CONCEIVEABLE qUALI~Y FOR FOR PL-566 FUNDS. TWO PROBLEMSWILL HAVE TO BE RESOLVED IN THIS WATERSHED. THE COUNTY WILL HAVE TO GET THE COOPERATION OF THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT CONCERNING THE DESIGN OF ~OUTE ~:)4 WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO CROSS IN OR VERY NEARBY THE PRO- POSED SITE. ALSO~ THERE IS A POLLUTION PROBLEM WHICH MUST BE WATCHED CLOSELY. ~K~ -- THIS WATERSHED ElLS TN THE EASTERN SECTION OF THE COUNTY SOUTHEAST OF ~ON-- TICELLO AND EXTENDS FROM THE ~IVANNA ~IVER TO CARTER MOUNTAIN. IT SHOWS GREAT PROMISE FOR DEVELOPMENT WITH COUNTY AND PL-5~6 FUNDS. THE PRELIMINARY STUDY SHOWS THAT ONE LARGE AN~ TWO SMALLER STRUCTURES WOULD PROVIDE FLOOD AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, WATER SUPPLY, AND RECREATIONAL AREA, LISTED BELOW ARE THE CAPACITIES OF THE TENTATIVE StTESt No. NqRMAL PqO( AC~ GALLONS ~ !40 1,869 607,425,000 OR (l-B) 305 4,606 1,496,950,000 5 51 576 187,200,000 ? 69 701 227,825,000 A PROdECT OF THIS NATURE WOULD NOT ONLY PREVENT FLOODS BUT FURNISH WATER FOR DOMESTIC AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY. ~Y INCORPORATING RECREATIONAL FACILITIES INTO THE GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT THIS TOO COULD BECOME A SHOW PLACE AND dOY FOREVER. ~ WOULD MAKE THIS A HIGH PRIORITY PROdECTo ~UC[ ~OUNTAIN - A SINGLE STRUCTURE GONSTRUOTED NEAR BOONESVILLE dUST OFF OF ~OUTE (301 COULD, WITH CAREFUL PLANNING, BECOME ANOTHER ~IG MEA]3OWS~ WITH A ONE HUNDRED ACRE LAKE FOR REOREATION, DOMESTIC AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY. ~ECAUSE OF ITS LOOATION~ ~ WOULD CONSIDER THIS A MUST PROdECT. HOWEVER~ TAKING A LONG LOOK AT COUNTY DEVELOPMENT~ ~ WOULD SUGGEST A LOWER PRIORITY THAN TSTIER~ ~UCK ~SLAND AND STOCKTON CREEK WATERSHEDS. ~- As NOW PROPOSED THIS WOULD HAVE TO BE TWO STRUCTURES. THE LARGER STRUCTURE IS ON A WATERSHED OF APPRX. 4,8~8 ACRES. THIS WOULD BE A MULTIPLE PURPOSE STRUCTURE, STORING 1,000,000,000 GALS. OF WATER FOR DOMESTIC USE. AT THIS STORAGE LEVEL THE LAKE SURFACE WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 125 ACRES. IT WOULD BE A NEEDED FLOOD CONTROL STRUCTURE WITH APPROXIMATELY 400 ACRES OF FLOOD PLAIN BELOW THE SITE. A SECOND STRUCTURE IS BEING PLANNED ON A SIDE STREAM. THE WATERSHED OF THIS FLOOD CONTROL STRUCTURE IS 1,340 ACRES, ~TS SURFACE WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES. J WOULD GIVE THIS THE LOWEST PRIORITY OF THE SIX, PREDDY1S CREEK - THIS IS AN EXCELLENT MULTIPLE-PURPOSE WATERSHED WITH THREE FEASIBLE DAM SITES. THE GENERAL AREA INVOLVED IS NORTHEAST OF CHARLOTTESVILLE. THE PRELIMINARY FIGURES SHOW= STRUCTURE NO S~_LZA ~ GALLONS _ 13 147 2,117 688,025,000 3 42 431 140,075,000 4 87 825 268,125,000 BECAUSE OF THE PRESENT EARLYSVILLE PROJECT, J WOULD SUGGEST A 4TH PLACE PRIORITY ON THIS. HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF GROWTH IN THE AREA, LAND ACQUISITION SHOULD BE STRESSED HERE. EMPHASIS SHOULD BE STRESSED AT THIS TIME IN SEOURING ADDITIONAL ACREAGE FOR RECREA- TION, WHICH WAS OVERLOOKED WHEN THE BEAVER CREEK WATERSHED WAS DEVELOPED. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTES 50 PERCENT TOWARDS THE ACQUISITION OF RECREATION LANDS. BY SECURING THESE FACILITIES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF OUR COUNTY AND THOSE EMPLOYED IN THE LOCAL IN- DUSTRIAL ESTASLtSHMENTS, IT WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL ATTRACTION TO THOSE ON VACATION TRAVELING THE SKYLINE DRIVE AND PARKWAYS EACH BUMMER, AS WELL AS THOSE USING ~NTERSTATE. 64o WITH THE SlX WATERSHEDS IN MIND, ~ FEEL THE FIRST THREE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE CONSIDERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. NOW IS THE TIME FOR CIVIC LEADERS, SERVICE CLUBS, AND INDIVIDUALS TO TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION. THEY MUST MAKE TBEIR WISHES KNOWN TO THE ~ARD OF SUPERVISORS AND GET BEHIND THEM CONCERNING THIS VERY IMPORTANT MATTER. WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ARE LOCAL INTEREST PROGRAMS. IT IS, THEREFORE, ESSENTIAL THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC VOlCE THEIR OPINIONS. AS IN THE PAST, THE THOMAS JEFFERSON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DIS- TRICT STAND READY TO ASSIST tN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THESE WORTHWHILE AND NECESSARY PROJECTSo~ WATERSHED SITE CAPACITIES (AFPROX.) COST OF DAM No__~. NORMAL POD_ . ~ AC. FT_ ~ C~NSTR. (APPROX?) GALLO?S _ BUCK ISLAND lA 140 1,869 $ 95,000.00 607,425,000 lB 305 4,606 200,000.00 1,496,950,000 5 51 576 54,~20~00 187,200,000 7 69 701 49,771.00 227,825,000 PREDDYS 0REEK lB 147 2,117 93,148.00 688,025,000 3 42 431 31,032.00 140,075,000 4 87 825 69,300.00 268,125,000 TOTIER CREEK I 345 4,518 135,500.00 1,477,386,000 2 283 4,736 166,700.00 1,548,672,000 BUCK ~OUNTAIN I 95 3,120 1,020,240,000 2 105 1,500 490,500,000 3 30 620 202,740,000 STOCKTON CREEK 4B 150 3,272 186,500.00 1,048,755,000 Ivy CREEK I 125 3,077 1,000,000,000 2 80 6,320 2,060,000,000 THIS IS THE ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE DAM NO...~.T INCLUDING LAND~ ACQUISITION~ SURVEYS, LEGAL, ENGINEERING AND CLEARING. COMMUNICATIONS WERE RECEIVED FROM THE ~OMANIS CLUB OF CROZET AND THE CLAUDIUS CROZET PARK, INC, ENDORSING THE STOCKTON CREEK PROJECT. THE FOREGOING REPORT WAS GIVEN CONSIDERABLE DISCOSSION AND THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUBMITTED HIS RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE MATTER. ON MOTION OF ~R. YANCEY, SECONDED BY MR~ PAULETT, THE SOIL CONSERVATION ~ERVICE WAS THANKED FOR ITS REPORT AND THE RECOMMENDATION Og THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE WAS ACCEPTED AS FOLLOWS= (1) THAT THE 0OUNTY PROCEED IMMEDIATELY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS FOR TOTIER CREEK, SITE NO. 1. (2) MAKE APPLICATION TO THE THOMAS JEFFERSON ~ATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND SOIL 0ONSERVATION SERVICE FOR ~UCK ISLAND, SITE No. lA. AND PROCEED WITH LAND ACQUISITION. (3) PROCEED WITH PLANS FOR LAND OPTIONS ON PREDDYS CREEK, SITE No. lB AND STOCKTON CREEK, SITE No. 4Bo (4) THAT DUCK MOUNTAIN AND IVY CREEK SE THE LAST PROJECTS ON PROPOSED SCHEDULE. EXECUTED DEED WAS PRESENTED BETWEEN THE CHESAPEAKE AND 0HIO RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE ~)MMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR RIGHT ~ND EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT~ OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A PUBLIC HIGHWAY AND APPURTENANCES OVER! UPON AND ACROSS THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND AT CROZET ADdACENT TO PROPERTY LEASED BY THE RAILWAY COMPANY TO THE COUNTY FOR PARKING PURPOSES. THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ADVISED THAT THE COUNTY SHOULD REQUEST THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TO ACCEPT INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM THE HIGHWAY REFERRED TO IN THE DEED. ACCORDINGLY, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED BY [~JIR. YANCEY, SEOONDED BY MRo PAULETT, AND dNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA, THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS BE AND IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO ACCEPT INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS ~0-FTo RIGHT-OF--WAY BEGINNING AT A POINT IN EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LINE 90 FEET MORE OR LESS, So26~ tO~Wo FROM CENTER LINE ~ MAIN TRACK OF THE MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION OF THE ~.~0 RAILWAY AT STATION 65?+65,3 AND CONTINUING FOR A DISTANCE OF 278.91FEET~ AS RECORDED tN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY IN DEED ~OOK 421, PAGE 2?5° IN CONNECTION WITH THE PARKING LOT ADdOINING THE ABOVE PROPERTY, THE ~)UNTY EXECUTIVE WAS AUTHORIZED TO PREPARE AGREEMENT WITH THE FIVE MERCHANTS AND COMPANIES ADdOINING THE PARKING LOT FACILITIES FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE ~75,00 PER YEAR FOR ~HE LEASE ON SAME. REPORTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ~ELFARE FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST~ 3~66~ WERE PRESENTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 63-67,1 AND ~3--67.2 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA. THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ADVISED THAT CONTRACTS HAVE BEEN SECURED ON THREE TRACTS OF LAND IN CONNECTION WITH THE EARLYBVlLLE PROd/CT AND REqUESTE9 ~UTHORITY TO PROCEED WITH DRAWING DEEDS AT $2~5.00 PER ACRE~ ON MOTION OF MR. PAULETT~ SECONDED BY ~o KtRKSEY~ ,THIS REQUEST WAS APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING TRACTS= 79.1 ACRES - HORACE C. MILLER. 8.1 ACRES - CHARLES CRENSHAW 10~°0 ACRES - VIRGINIA RESORTS, AL$O~ IN CONNECTION WITH THE FOREGOING PROdECT~ THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ADVISED THAT MR. ~M. Ho DANSY, dR, DESIRE ~0 FTc RIGHT OF WAY. ON MOTION OF ~R. PAULETT, SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: ~IEREAS~ REQUEST HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM ~ILLIAM H. DANCY~ dR. FOR ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY OF THIRTY FEET FOR A DISTANCE OF 1~180 FEET ON AIR- PORT PROPERTY OWNED dOINTLY BY THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE AND CITY OF CHAR- LOTTESVILLE IN ORDER THAT A MORE ADEQUATE ACCESS TO PROPERTY OWNED BY THE ABOVE CAN BE MAINTAINE~ NO~, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ~)UNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE 00UNTY, VIRGINIA~ THAT THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY IS HEREBY APPROVED SUBdECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE~CHARLOTTESVlLLE CiTY CO, UNC.iL~AND FURTHER AUTHORIZES THE COUNTY TO HAVE APPROPRIATE DEED COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM CITY COUNCIL ADVISING THAT MR o DAVE ~OOD HAD BEEN REAPPOINTED TO THE AIRPORT COMMISSION BY THAT BODY~ SUBdECT TO CONCURRENCE BY THIS BOARD, ON MOTION OF MR. THRAVES~ SECONDED BY ~o YANCEY~ THIS REAPPOINTMENT WAS GIVEN. APPROVAL BY THIS BOARD, THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ADVISED THAT STREET NAMES HAD BEEN REVISED AND ADDED IN THE COMMUNITY OF CROZET BUT IN ORDER TO MAKE SAME OFFICIAL~ ACTION WOULD HAVE TO BE TAKEN BY THIS BOARD. HOWEVER~ HE SUGGESTED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE HELD BEFORE ACTION IS TAKEN IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL OF THE CITIZENS IN THAT AREA. ACCORDINGLY~ MOTION WAS OFFERED BY MR o PAULETT~ SECONDED BY MRo KIRKSEY~ CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON THIS MATTER AT THE REGULAR NOVEMBER MEETING. REPORT OF THE S. P, C. A. FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER WAS RECEIVED AND CLAIM IN THE AMOUNT OF ~15~.60 SUBMITTED, ON MOTION OF ~Ro KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY~ THIS CLAIM WAS APPROVED FOR PAYMENT'. CLAIM AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FROM REDLAND FARM FOR ONE EWE KILLED BY DOGS. ON MOTION OF r~. KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR, PAULETT, THIS CLAIM WAS APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF ~15,00o CLAIM AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. M, Y. SUTHERLAND FOR ONE LAMB KILLED BY ~OG$o 0N MOTION OF MR. PAULETT~ SECONDED BY MRo'YANOEY~ MRo SUTHERLAND WAS ALLOWED ~0.00 FOR THIS LAMB. CLAIM AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FROM ~. M. ~o CRA~FORD FOR FIVE EWES AND ONE BUCK KILLED BY DOGS° ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR, PAULETT~ MR. CRA~FORD WAS ALLOWED ~o00 FOR THIS BUCK AND ~20,00 FOR EACH OF THE EWES, CLAIM AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. ~. A. VANDERPLOEG FOR FOUR PIGS KILLED BY DOGS. ON MOTION OF ~R, KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY ~v~. YANCEY~ MR, VANDERPLOEG WAS ALLOWED ~.00 FOR EACH OF THESE PIGS, ON MOTION OF ~o KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY ~R. ~AULETT~ THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE WAS AUTHO- RIZED TO CLOSE TH/ DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ON THE DATES OF OCTOBER ~1 AND ~VEMBER 1~ 1~6~ FOR TURN-OVER AUDIT PURPOSES. THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE WAS ALSO AUTHORIZED TO MAIL A SAMPLE BALLOT EXPLAINING THE qUESTIONS REGARDING ELECTION OF SUPERVISORS ALONG WITH BILLS BEING MAILED FROM THAT OFFICE ON 19~6 TAXES. ~R, ~ESLEY BLANK~ A RETIRED ENGINEER~ APPEARED AND OFFERED HIS SERVICES TO THE COUNTY AT ANY TIME THE COUNTY WISHED TO CALL UPON HIM. MR. BLANK WAS THANKED FOR HIS OFFER AND ASSURED THAT THE ~OUNTY WOULD WELCOME HIS AI~ ON FUTURE PROdECTS. MR. ALLAN B, KINDRICK APPEARED AND PRESENTED COMMUNICATION IN WHICH HE STATED THAT IT WAS HIS UNDERSTANDING THAT IN THE PROCESS OF PURCHASING LAND FOR THE EARLYSVILLE PROdECT THAT APPROXIMATELY T~ELVE ACRES EXISTED AT THE END OF THE WATER IMPOUNDMENT AREA TO ~HICH THE COUNTY NEITHER HAS ACCESS TO NOR A NEED FOR. HE STATED HE ~tSHED AN OPTION TO PURCHASE THIS TRACT ON OR BEFOR ~UNE 30~ 1967 FOR ~22~,00 PER ACRE PLUS THE COUNTYIS LEGAL COSTS. MR. DOWNING SMITH~ COMMONWEALTHtS ATTORNEY~ ADVISED MR. KiNDRIGK THAT THE COUNTY COULD NOT REGALLY GIVE HIM AN OPTION TO PURCHASE THIS PROPERTY, HOWEVER~ WHEN AND IF THE PROPERTY BECAME FOR SA~ AN OFFER FROM HIM COULD BE GIVEN CONSIDERATION. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE MILLER SCHOOL OF ALBEMARLE REQUESTING EXEMPTION FROM THE COUNTY1S UTILITY TAX SINCE SUCH SCHOOL IS A TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATION. THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUGGESTED THAT SINCE NO EXEMPTIONS WERE ALLOWED IN THE COUNTYIS ORDINANCE~ THAT SUCH COMMUNICATION BE FILED FOR FUTURE REFERENCE IN THE EVENT SUCH ORDINANCE SHOULD BE AMENDED AT A LATER DATE AND THAT THE MILLER SCHOOL BE SO ADVISED. ON MOTION OF MR, PAULETT~ SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ THE COUNTY EXECUTIVEIS RECOMMENDATION WAS ACCEPTED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY AMOUNTING TO ~572~920o54 WERE PRESENTED~ EXAMINED~ AND ALLOWED AND CERTIFIED TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FOR PAYMENT AND CHARGED AGAINST THE FOLLOWING FUNDSt GENERAL REVENUE FUND GENERAL OPERATING FUND SCHOOL OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND VIRGINIA PUBLIC ASSISTANCE FUND DOG TAX FUND 58,365.50 297,501.96 180,570.10 27 ~ 083.97 743.30 COMMONWEALTH OF V IRG I N ! A CURRENT CRED! T ACCT. ~_~_~8- 5.59~,23 ~ 2 TOTAL $572,9 0.54 ON MOTION~ THE MEETING WAS ADdOURNED.