1965-02-18 A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA)
WAS HELD AT THE OFFICE BUILDING OF SAID COUNTY ON THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY~ 1965.
PRESENT: MESSES. EDGAR No GARNETT, GARRETT Wo KIRKSEY, GEORGE C. PALMER~ II, F. E.
PAULETT~ ROBERT THRAVES AND R, A. YANCEY.
ABSENT': NONE.
OFFICERS PRESENT: ASSISTANT COUN?Y EXECUTfVE AND COMMONWEALTHIS ATTORNEY.
THE MEETING OPENED WITH THE LORDIS PRAYER LED BY MR. 0TIS L. BROWN.
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF ~ANUARY 19~ 1965~ WERE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
MR o A. So BROWN~ RESIDENT HIGHWAY ENGINEER~ APPEARED AND INTRODUCED TO THE BOARD MR.
RICHARD 0OATS, HIS NEW ASSISTANT.
MR. BROWN ASKED IF THE BOARD DESIRED TO SET THE DATE AT THIS TIME FOR ANNUAL ROAD
MEETING~ SUCH MEETING TO BE HELD FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING REQUESTS FOR BOTH ADDITIONS TO
THE SECONDARY SYSTEM AND IMPROVEMENTS TO ROADS NOW IN SAID SYSTEM. ON MOTION OF MR. P~LMER~
SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY, 1;30 P.M. ON MARCH 18~ 1965, WAS SET AS THE TIME FOR ANNUAL ROAD MEE~--
lNG AND THE CLERK WAS 91RECTED TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF THIS MEETING IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
MR. BROWN ALSO APPEARED WITH REGARD TO TWO PROPOSED CHANGES IN STATE ROUTES WHICH
WOULD RESULT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OF INTERSTATE ROUTE 6~. HE PRESENTED SKETCHES OF THESE
CHANGES TO THE BOARD. AFTER DISCUSSION THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED BY MR. THRAVES~
SECONDED BY MR. PALMER, AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED:
WHEREAS, MR. A. S. BROWN~ RESIDENT HIGHWAY ENGINEER~ HAS THIS DAY
SHOWN THE CHANGE PROPOSED FOR THE RELOCATION OF STATE ROUTE 68A AT YANCEYS
MILL IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF I~TERSTATE ROUTE 6A; AND
WH£REAS, IT APPEARS THAT THE RELOCATION OF SAID ROAD TO THE ~EST OF
INTERSTATE ROUTE 6~ INSTEAD OF CROSSING THE PROPOSED INTERSTATE ROUTE AND
CONNECTING WITH THE EXISTING STATE ROUTE 68A~ APPEARS TO BE MORE ECONOMICAL
AND WOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC BETTER; AND
~IEREAS, such CHANGE WOULD FOLLOW THE EXISTING STATE ROUTE 68~ TO
BE TERMINATED AT THE ~NTERSTATE RIGHT-OF-WAY;
N0~ THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA~ DOES EXPRESS ITS APPROVAL OF SAID CHANGE.
ALSO, IN CONNECTION WITH THE FOREGOING DISCUSSION, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED
BY ~Ro PALMER~ SECONDED BY ~R~ KIRKSEY, AND UNANIMOUSLY ~DOPTED:
WHEREAS~ MR, A. So BROWN~ RESIDENT HIGHWAY ENGIN. EER~ HAS SUBMITTED
PREL. IMINARY PLANS SHOWING THE TERMINATION OF STATE ROUTE 682 AT THE RIGHT-
OF-WAY OF INTERSTATE ROUTE 6~; AND
WHEREAS, SUCH TERMINATION WOULD ALTER THE EXISTING ROAD PATTERN OF
ROUTE 652~ THEREBY DISRUPTING THE TRAFFIC PATTERN HERETOFORE MAINTAINED ON
SAID ROAD; AND
~/~-IEREAS, THISrBOARD :DOES NOT FEEL THAT THE PUBLIC WOULD BE
ADEQUATELY SERVED BY THE ELIMINATION OF EXISTING STATE ROUTE
NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPER--
VISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA~ THAT THIS BOARD ]DOES UNALTERABLY
OPPOSE THE PROPOSED CHANGE WHICH WOULD ALLOW THE TERMINATION OF STATE
ROUTE 682, RESULTING IN TWO SECTIONS OF DEAD END ROAD~ AND
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
AND THE CONSULTANTS EMPLOYED GIVE FURTHER STUDY TO THIS PROPOSED CHANGE
IN AN EFFORT TO INSURE THAT THIS PORTION OF EXISTING ROUTE 682 NOT BE
ELIMINATED,
MR o BROWN ALSO DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD ROUTE 659~ FROM ROUTE 631 TO DEAD END~ FOR
WHICH AN ALLOCATION HAD BEEN MADE FOR WIDENING AND SURFACE TREATMENT. MRo BROWN ADVISED
THAT HIS DEPARTMENT HAD BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN ALL OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY NEEDED iN THIS
INSTANCE DUE TO THE FACT THAT SOME OF THE LANDOWNERS INVOLVED DID NOT WISH THIS ROAD TO BE
SURFACE TREATED, SOME MEMBERS OF THE BOARD EXPRESSED THE OPINION THAT '~ERHAPS THE FUNDS
ALLOCATED FOR THIS ROAD COULD BE USED WHERE THERE WAS A NEED FOR SURFACE TREATMENT.
BROWN WAS REQUESTED TO INVESTIGATE THIS MATTER AND BRING A RECOMMENDATION TO TH/ BOARD AT
ITS NEXT REGULAR MEETING.
MR. PAULETT ASKED MR. BROWN IF THE LOAD LIMIT ON THE SCOTTSVILLE BRIDGE COULD BE
INCREASED SINCE THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE BRIDGE, MR. BROWN ADVISED THAT THE BRIDGE FLOOR
WAS REPLACED BUT THIS WOULD NOT STRENGTHEN THE BRIDGE ITSELF~ HOWEVER HE WOULD INVESTIGATE
THE POSTED LOAD LIMIT.
MR. GARNETT INQUIRED REGARDING THE TERRIBLE CONDITION OF ROUTE 68~ BETWEEN ROUTES
691 AND ?88. ~R. BROWN ADVISED THAT HE WOULD CHECK THE MAINTENANCE ON THIS SECTION OF ROAD.
COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ADVISING THAT
IN ACCORDANCE ~ITH RESOLUTION OF THIS BOARD~ DATED NOVEMBER 19~ ~96~ THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONS
TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM WERE APPROVED~ EFFECTIVE ~ANUARY ~
OAK TERRACE SUBDIVISION:
INGLEWOOD DRIVE FROM HYDRAULIC ROAD (ROUTE ?~3) AND ENDING 100 FEET BEYOND
THE INTERSECTION OF INGLEWOOD DRIVE AND INGLEWOOD COURT - LENGTH 0.23 MILE.
INGLEWOOD COURT FROM INGLEWOOD DRIVE ENDING WITH THE TURN AROUND AT THE END
OF INGLEWOOD COURT - LENGTH 0.08 MILE.
NORTH BERKSHIRE ROAD STARTING AT THE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION AND ENDING AT
BARTERBROOK SUBDIVISION LINE - LENGTH 0°05 MILE.
PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON 2,6? ACRE TRACT LOCATED AT INTERSECTION OF ROUTES 6~3 AND ?~3 AS
SURVEYED FOR R. L, BRANHAM BY 0, R. RANDOLPH AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION.
ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PALMER~ THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND
CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD.
PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON ~.~ ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON ROUTE 671 NEAR FREE UNION AS SURVEYED
FOR JOHN Go DUNN BY O. Ro RANDOLPH AN9 APPROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. ON &lOTION
OF MR, KIRKSEYy SECONDED BY ~R. PAULETT~ THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK
WERE AUTHORIZE9 TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD.
PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON LOTS A AND B~ A REDIVlSION OF LOTS 31 AND 32~ LAUREL HILLS
SUBDIVISION~ AS PREPARE9-BY Oo R, RANDOLPH AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION.
ON MOTION OF MR. YANCEY) SECONDED BY MR. THRAVES~ THIS PLAT WAS APPROVE9 AND THE CHAIRMAN
AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD.
PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON LOTS ~0 AND ~2~ GLENAIRE SUBDIVISION) WITH NOTATION THEREON AS
TO SUB-STANDARD ROADS) AS PREPARED BY AMOS R. SWEET AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION. ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY) SECONDED BY MR. PALMER~ THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED AND
THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD.
PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON 1.35 ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON ROUTE 693 NEAR NORTH GARDEN AS SUR-
VEYED FOR LOUISE ~ILLIAMS BY Bo AUBREY HUFFMAN AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS-
SION, ON MOTION OF MR. YANCEY) SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED AND THE
CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD.
PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON LOT E-I~ A DIVISION OF 32 ACRES ON ROUTE 29~ NORTH~ THE LOCATION
OF MONTICELLO NATIONAL BANK) AS PREPARED BY B. AUBREY HUFFMAN AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND
COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONS. ON MOTION OF MR. THRAVES) SEOONDED BY MR. YANCEY~ THIS PLAT
WAS APPROVED AND THE OHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZE9 TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD.
PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON LoTs lA AND 1B~ A DIVISION OF LoT 1~ BLOCK D~ SECTION 2~ OAK
HILL SUBDIVISlON~ AS PREPARED BY~B, AUBREY HUFFMAN AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSIONS. ON MOTION OF MR. PAULETT~ SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ THIS PLAT WAS
APPROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOAR~.
PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON LOTS A AND B, A DIVISION OF PARCEL ON OVERLOOK ~RIVE' OPPOSITE
SHERWOOD FARMS SUBDIVlSION~ AS PREPARED BY B. AUBREY HUFFMAN AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND
COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONS. ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PA~LETT~ THIS PLAT
WAS APPROVED AND .THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD.
PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON LOTS Ay B~ C~ D AND E, A DIVISION OF 3°6 ACRES AT INTERSECTION
OF ROUTES ~50 AND 20~ AS PREPARED BY Bo AUBREY HUFFMAN AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSIONS. ON MOTION OF MR. THRAVES, SECONDED BY MR. YANOEY, THIS PLAT WAS AP-
PROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD.
PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON LOT 1~ BLOCK D~ SECTION G~ CARRSBROOK SUBDIVlSION~ AS PREPARED
BY B, AUBREY HUFFMAN AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONS. ON MOTION
OF MR. THRAVES~ SECONDED BY ~R. YANCEY~ THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED AN~ THE CHAIRMAN AND C~RK
WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD.
STATEMENTS OF EXPENSES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE~ THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND THE
OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTHtS ATTORNEY WERE PRESENTED FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 19~o ON
MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY, THESE STATEMENTS WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED,
STATEMENT OF EXPENSES INCURRED~IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THE COUNTY JAIL WAS SUBMITTED
ALONG WITH SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PRISONER DAYS FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY~ 19~5o ON MOTION
OF MR. PAULETT~ SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ THESE STATEMENTS WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROYED.
REPORTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE WERE PRESENTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTIONS 63-67.1 AND 63-6?°2 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA~ AND ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~
SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY~ WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
CLAIM OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HOSPITAL tN THE AMOUNT OF ~5~o~9 FOR THE
HOSPITALIZATION OF INDIGENT PATIENTS WAS~PRESENTED AND ON MOTION OF ~R. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED
BY MRo PALMER~ WAS APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
REPORT OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY~ 1965~ WAS RECEIVED AND
ORDERED FILED.
THE INSURANCE COMMITTEE SUBMITTED TABULATION OF PROPOSALS FROM FOUR COMPANIES
BIDDING ON THE COUNTYtS GROUP HOSPITALIZATION AND LIFE POLICY. AFTER DISCUSSION OF THIS
MATTER~ THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ACCEPTANCE OF THE BI9 OF BLUE CROSS-BLUE SHIELD AND
ALSO RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNTY'EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITY OF RAISING THE INSURANCE COVERAGE
ON CLASS I EMPLOYEES FROM ~?,500 TO ~10~OOO AND DECREASING THE COVERAGE FOR THOSE OVER
SIXTY-FIVE TO ~OO0 IN ORDER TO SAVE ON OVERALL PREMIUMS. ON MOTION OF MR. PAULETT~
SECONDED BY ~JR. YANCEY~ THE REPORT OF THE INSURANCE COMMITTEE WAS'UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED.
THE FOLLOWING REPORT WAS RECEIVED [ROM THE dOINT dUVENILE' DETENTION HOME COM-
MITTEN:
~YOUR CGMMITTEE .MET WITH ~R. W~DDINGTON AND MR. BOWMAN OF-THE STATE
JUVENILE PROBATION AND DETENTION DEPARTMENT~ ON FEBRUARY ~, ~C~ AND
DISCUSSED DETAILS TO BE FOLLOWED IN THE PREPARATION OF 'PLANS FOR A
HOME TO BE LOCATED IN THIS AREA~ AND A CONTRACT TO BE SUBMITTED TO
THE STATE FOR THEIR APPROVAL.
~E ARE ENCLOSING COPY OF PROPOSED CONTRACT AND RECOMMEND THAT YOU
AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THIS CONTRACT. A PROPOSED RESOLUTION IS
ALSO ENCLOSED.
WE ALSO RECOMMEND THE JOINT COMMITTEE BE AUTHORIZED TO EMPLOY AN
ARCHITECT FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE PLANS.ff
AFTER CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING REPORT~ THE SAME WAS ADOPTED ON MOTION OF
PALMER~ SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ AND THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING
RECORDED VOTE: AYES - MESSRS. GARNETT~ KIRKSEY~ PALMER~ PAULETT~ THRAVES AND YANCEY.
NAYS - NONE.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ASSISTANT OOUNTY EXECUTIVE~ OTIS L. BROWN~ TO
EXECUTE A OONTRAOT ON BEHALF OF THE OOUNTY OF ALBEMARLE~ BETWEEN THE OOUNTY~
THE CITY OF OHARLOTTESVILLE AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA~ PERTAINING TO
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A JUVENILE DETENTION HOI~E TO BE LOOATED IN OR NEAR THE
OiTY;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE E~ARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
THAT OTIS L. BROWN~ ASSISTANT COUNTY EXECUTIVE~ BE AND HE IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED
AND DIRECTED TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT~ DATED THE I~TH DAY OF FEBRUARY~ 1965~ ON
BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE~ BETWEEN THE COUNTY~ CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A dUVENILE
DETENTION HOME TO BE LOCATED IN OR NEAR THE CITY, FOR THE TEMPORARY DETENTION
OF dUVENILES, AND THE REIMBURSEMENT BY THE COMMONWEALTH TO THE CITY/COUNTY FOR
PART OF THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH HOME AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 16.1-201
VIRGINIA CODE ANN. (196ACu~. SUPP.).
MR o EDWARD DEE~S, CHAIRMAN OF THE LIBRARY BOARD, AND MR. RAY WILLIAMS, LIBRARY DIREC-
TOR, APPEARED AND-PRESENTED THE PROPOSED 1965o.66 BUDGET OF THE MCINTIRE PUBLIC LIBRARY.
WILLIAMS EXPLAINED IN SOME DETAIL THE INCREASES INCLUDED IN SUCH BUDGET. ON MOTION OF
PALMER, SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ IT WAS ORDERED THAT THIS BUDGET BE RECEIVED.
COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM DAVID Eo SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF THE CHAMBER
OF 0OMMERCE, ENCLOSING ANNUAL REPORT OF THE iNDUSTRIAL COMMISSION AND AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENT, AND REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION OF ~2,500°00 TO BE INCLUDED IN THE COUNTYWS NEXT
FISCAL YEAR BUDGET. ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR. PALMER, THE REPORT OF THE
iNDUSTRIAL COMMISSION WAS RECEIVED AND ORDERED FILED AND THE REQUEST WAS REFERRED TO THE
FINANCE COMMITTEE FOR CONSIDERATION IN THE OVERALL BUDGET.
COPY OF LETTER ADDRESSED TO MRS. HALLIE K. MABRY, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE DISTRICT
HOME, FROM DR. MALCOLM TENNEY, DIRECTOR OF ~HE WAYNESBORO HEALTH DEPARTMENT, COMPLIMENTING
MRS. MABRY ON THE EXCELLENT dOB SHE IS DOING IN OPERATING THE NURSING HOME WAS PRESENTED.
ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY) SECONDED BY MR. YANOEY, THIS COM.MUNIOATION ~AS ACCEPTED AND THE
CLERK WAS DIRECTED TO WRITE MRS. MABRY COMMENDING HER FOR THE OUTSTANDING WORK SHE HAS ]::)ONE.
THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS RECElVE~ FROM THE NELSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
W~WHEREAS) TBE SCHUYLER COMMUNITY OF NELSON COUNTY IS LOCATED NEAR STATE HIGHWAY
NO. 6, A HEAVILY TRAVELED THRU HIGHWAY, THIS COMMUNITY HAS AN INDUSTRY) THE
ALBERENE STONE DIVISION OF GEORGIA MARBLE Co., EMPLOYING SOME ~OC) PEOPLE, AND
HAS A POPULATION IN NELSON COUNTY OF SOME 500 PEOPLE;
WHEREAS, THERE IS NO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFF. ICER RESIDING IN OR NEAR THIS COMMUNITY)
AN~ THERE IS A GREAT NEED FOR SUCH AN OFFICER TO RESIDE THERE;
WHEREAS, THERE IS NO-PERSON AVAILABLE NOW TO SERVE AS A DEPUTY SHERIFF AND RESIDE
IN THIS COMMUNITY, AND SINCE THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY-NELSON COUNTY LINE GOES THROUGH
THIS COMMUNITY~ THE UURISDICTION OF A DEPUTY SHERIFF IS LIMITED;
NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF NELSON
COUNTY~ VIRGINIA THAT COL. Co W. WOODSON, ~Ro, SUPT. OF VIRGINIA STATE POLICE,
SS RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED TO STATION A STATE TROOPER IN THE SCHUYLER COMMUNITY
AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE TIME. THE CLERK OF THIS BOAR9 IS DIRECTED TO SEND A
COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO COL. C. ~. WOODSON, JR.~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ALBEMARLE COUNTY) VIRGINIA~ AND GEORGE LAWHORNE, ~EPRESENTATIVE OF THE SCHUYLER
P.T.A."
AFTER DISCUSSION OF THIS MATTER ~ITH W. So COOK, SHERIFF, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED
BY MR. KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY) AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED:
WHEREAS, ON FEBRUARY 18, 1965~ THIS BOARD RECEIVED RESOLUTION FROM THE
NELSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REQUESTING ASSIGNMENT OF A STATE POLICE
OFFICER TO THE SCHUYLER COMMUNITY, COPY OF SAID RESOLUTION HAVING BEEN FORWARDED
TO OOL. C. ~. ~OODSON, ~R~) SUPERINTENDENT OF VIRGINIA STATE POLICE; AND
WHEREAS, UPON RECEIPT OF THIS RESOLUTION, THiS BOARD .CONFERRED WITH
W. S. COOK, SHERIFF OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, WHO ADVISED .THAT THERE IS A' DIRE
NEED FOR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IN THE SCHUYLER AREA;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, THAT THIS BOARD DOES HEREBY ENDORSE THE AFORE-
MENTIONED RESOLUTION OF THE NELSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND DOES URGE
THE STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO GIVE SERIOUS CONSIDERATION TO THE REQUEST
CONTAINED THEREIN.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION BE
FORWARDED TO COL. Co W. WOODSON, dR. AND TO THE NELSON COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS.
NOTICE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS OF PUBLIC HEARINGS TO BE
HELD AT VARIOUS POINTS THROUGHOUT THE STATE WITH REGARD TO THE JAMES RIVER BASIN. MR.
PAULETT WAS REQUESTED TO REPRESENT THIS BOARD'AT THE MEETING SaHEDULED IN LYNCHBURG, VIR-
GINI~ ON MARCH 10, 10~5, IF POSSIBLE.
COPY OF LETTER ADDRESSED TO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND ~NLAND FISHERIES
BY THE IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE, WITH REGARD TO SPRING GOBBLER SEASON, WAS ,RECEIVED AND ORDERED
FILED.
CLAIM AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND FOR ONE CALF KILLED BY DOGS WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. JOHN
CLAYTON. ON MOTION OF MR. YANCEY, SECONDED BY MRo KIRKSEY~ MR. CLAYTON WAS ALLOWED
FOR THIS CALF.
CLAIM AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND FOR TWO EWES KILLED BY DOGS WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. GUY
VIA. ON MOTION OF MR, KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR. PALMER, MR. VIA WAS ALLOWED ~0,00 FOR EACH
OF THESE EWES.
CLAIM AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FOR TWO GEESE KILLED BY DOGS FROM MR.
JOHN MORRIS. ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER, SECONDED BY'MR. YANCEY, MR. MORRIS WAS ALLOWED ~5o00
FOR EACH OF THESE GEESE.
MR. PAULETT NOMINATED DR. RICHARD MARKS TO SERVE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM THE
SCOTTSVILLE DISTRICT, WHICH NOMINATION WAS SECONDED BY ~Ro KIRKSEY AND UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
(DR, MARKS~ TERM RUNS THROUGH DECEMBER 31,
ME. BROWN CALLED THE BOARD1S ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT IT HAD BEEN NECESSARY TO
ORDER ADDITIONAL FILES FOR~THE REAL ESTATE OFFICE FOR WHICH A SPECIAL APPROPRIATION OF FuNDs
WOULD BE REQUIRED. 0N MOTION OF ~Ro PALMER, SECONDED BY MRo KIRKSEY, THE FOLLOWING RESOLU-
TION WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED, RULES WITH REGARD TO SECOND READING BEING SUSPENDED=
~rHEREAS IT HAS BECOME NECESSARY TO PURCHASE ADDITIONAL FILES IN THE
REAL ESTATE DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, THE COST OF SUCH FILES
BEING tN.THE AMOUNT OF
N0~ THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA~ THAT ~06.67 BE AND TH/ SAME IS HEREBY AP-
PROPRIATED TO COVER THE COST OF SAID FILES; AND
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE STATE COMPENSATION BOARD BE AND IS
HEREBY REQUESTED TO PARTICIPATE IN ITS PBOPORTIONATE SHARE OF THIS EXPENDI-
TVREo
COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. IVAN HALL, DISTRICT MANAGER OF THE VIRGINIA
ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY IN WHICH MR. HALL ADVISED THAT CONTRACTS WITH COUNTIES ARE
UNIFORM AND COVER ELECTRIC SERVICES BESIDES THAT FOR SCHOOLS. HE STATED THAT A CHANGE IN
RATE FOR THESE OTHER SERVICES MUST BE APPLIED TO ALL COUNTIES AND ANY DOWNWARD ADdUSTMENT
IN THE COST OF ELECTRICITY FOR SUCH CASES IS NOT WARRANTED AT THIS TIME.
REPORT OF THE SoPoC.A. FOR THE MONTH OF ~ANUARY, 1965~ WAS RECEIVED AND ORDERED
FILED.
COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. A. MARTIN MACY OF HOLLADAY AVIATION WITH REGARD
TO THRE~ PROdECTS NEEDED AT THE ~OINT AIRPORT. HE LISTED THESE PROdECTS AS (1) ADDITIONAL
OFFICE SPACE FOR HOLLADAY OPERATIONS AND RENTAL TO OTHER USERS; (2) RAMP SPACE FOR CARGO
HANDLING; AND (3) T HANGARS. HE FURTHER STATED THAT HIS COMPANY HAS BEEN ABLE TO PROVIDE
THE OFFICE SPACE BY PARTITIONING THE UNUSED CONFERENCE ROOM IN THE NEW BUILDING; HOWEVERj
THE OTHER TWO PROdEGTS WERE BADLY NEEDED. ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR.
PALMER~ THIS MATTER WAS REFERRE~ TO THE AIRPORT COMMISSION FOR RECOMMENDATION, THE CLERK
WAS ALSO DIRECTED TO REQUEST THAT FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF HOLLADAY AVIATION BE SUBMITTED TO
THIS
THE FOLLOWING REPORT WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENTS=
"THE COMMITTEE ON REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT W~!SHES TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING REPORT:
IT IS REALIZED THAT EQUITABLE TAX ASSESSMENT ON REAL ESTATE AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
IS A btOST DIFFICULT dOB. THIS IS EVIDENCED BY THE FACT THAT LOCALITIES THROUGH-
OUT THE COMMONWEALTH AND THE UNtTE~ STATES ARE CONSTANTLY LOOKING FOR BETTER
METHODS OF APPRAISAL AND ASSESSMENT. IT IS NECESSARY THAT ALBEMARLE COUNTY
CONTINUE TO REVIEW ITS METHODS OF ASSESSMENT.
IN ORDER TO BETTER ~NDERSTAND THE RECOMMENDATIONS BEING MADE~ A BRIEF REVIEW OF
THE PRESENT ASSESSMENT ORGANIZATION IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY IS NECESSARY.
PRESENTLY~ THE COUNTY, AS REQUIRED BY CODE~ HAS AN ASSESSMENT EVERY SIX YEARS
WHEREBY ALL REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES ARE EVALUATED AND APPRAISED BY A [~)ARD OF
ASSESSORS. IN RECENT REASSESSMENTS~ THE BOARD OF ASSESSORS HAVE EMPLOYED
PROFESSIONAL APPRAISERS SUPPLIED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION TO
ASSIST IN THE ACTUAL FIELD WORK. THESE APPRAISERS WORK UNDER THE DIRECTION
OF THE LOCAL BOARD-OF ASSESSORS.
UPON COMPLETION OF THE REASSESSMENT~ THE BOARD OF ASSESSORS HOLD MEETINGS AT
WHICH TIME CITIZENS AGGRIEVED AT THE VALUES PLACED ON THEIR PROPERTY APPEAR
AND MAKE THEIR VIEWS KNOWN. UPON COMPLETION OF SAID HEARINGS AND CHANGES
MA~E AS A RESULT THEREOF~ THE REASSESSMENT IS CONSIDERED TO BE COMPLETE AND
THE NEW LAND BOOK IS CERTIFIED.
A LOCAL THREE MAN BOARD OF EQUALIZATION IS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE
LAWS TO HEAR CONTINUING COMPLAINTS ON THE VALUES PLACED DURING THE REASSESS-
~ENT. SUCH E~UALIZATION BOARD IS APPOINTED FOR ONE YEAR BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS. THIS BOARD~ BY LAW~ HAS THE AUTHORITY TO ADdUST APPRAISED
VALUES IN ORDER TO EQUALIZE THE ASSESSMENTS. ALTHOUGH THE BOARD HAS THE
AUTHORITY TO REVIEW VALUEB~ DECREASING AND INCREASING THEM~ WHETHER A
SPECIFIC COMPLAINT HAS BEEN MADE OR NOT; PRACTICALLY SPEAKING~ THE
ALBEMARLE ~)ARD OF EQUALIZATION HAS USUALLY CONFINED ITSELF TO HEARING
AND ACTING ON SPECIFIC COMPLAINTS·
THE DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT IS CHARGED WITH KEEPING ALL RECORDS
AND FILES PERTAINING TO VALUES AND ASSESSMENTS, HOWEVER~ THE DEPARTMENT
CANNOT CHANGE ANY VALUES PLACED ON REAL ESTATE BY THE SIX YEAR ASSESSMENT
UNLESS THE PROPERTY IS DIVlDED~ ALTERED~ OR~ IMPROVEMENTS CHANGED. UNDER THE
PRESENT SYSTEM OF ASSESSMENT~ ONLY THE BOARD OF [qUALIZATION CAN INCREASE OR
DECREASE THE VALUES PLACED BY THE BOARD OF ASSESSORS.
THE DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT HAS THE AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY
OF APPRAISING NEW CONSTRUCTION~ DIVISION AND REDIVISlON OF LAND AND ALTERATIONS
AND IMPROVEMENTS. THE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT ALTER ANY ASSESSMENT UNLESS A CHANGE
HAS OCCURRED. ANY COMPLAINTS RECEIVED ON VALUES PLACED BY THE DEPARTMENT ARE
REFERRED TO THE EQUALIZATION E~)ARD. ~F THE PROPERTY OWNER DOES NOT RECEIVE
SATISFACTION~ HE HAS RECOURSE TO THE COURTS.
UNDER THE PRESENT METHOD~ THE DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT DOES NOT
REVIEW PROPERTIES OR GROUPS OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE COUNTY TO DETERMINE IF
THE ASSESSMENT IS IN LINE WITH SIMILAR PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. AT
THE SAME TIME~ THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION HAS CONFINED ITSELF TO SERVING AS A
REVIEW BOARD FOR SPECIFIC COMPLAINTS, AS A RESULT, THERE HAS BEEN A TENDENCY
FOR VALUES THAT ARE PLACED ON PROPERTIES BY THE REAL [STATE ASSESSMENT DEPART-
MENT TO BE OUT OF LINE WITH EXISTING VALUES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES PREVIOUSLY
ASSESSED BY THE BOARD OF.ASSESSORS. ~N A RAPIDLY CHANGING COUNTY SUCH AS
ALBEMARLE~ THE ENTIRE COMPLEXION OF AN AREA OAN EASILY CHANGE DURING A SIX
YEAR PERIOD.
THIS COMMITTEE DESIRES TO HAVE A FAIR AND EQUITABLE ASSESSMENT OF PROPERTY FOR ALL
CITIZENS. IT REALIZES THAT SOME INEQUITIES WILL ALWAYS EXIST AND METHODS OF RECOURSE
AND APPEAL SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE
FOLLOWING METHOD OF APPRAISAL AND ASSESSMENT BE PROVIDEDt
THAT THE COUNTY~ AS PROVIDED BY VIRGINIA CODE~ HAVE A REAPPRAISAL OF REAL
PROPERTY EVERY SIR YEARS~ AT WHICH TIME ALL PROPERTIES BE EVALUATED. AND THE
ASSESSMENT RATIO BE DETERMINED·
THAT THE COUNTY INITIATE A CONTINUOUS REVIEW OF REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT BY THE
REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT. SUCH CONTINUOUS REVIEW WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS=
Ae
STAFF MEMBERS KEEP A CONSTANT CHECK ON VALUES OF REAL ESTATE IN AREAS OF
THE COUNTY AND WHEN IT BECOMES APPARENT THAT ASSESSED VALUES ARE INCON-
SISTENT WITH FAIR MARKET VALUES~ THE PROPERTY BE RE-EVALUATED AND SUCH
NEW VALUES SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF [qUALIZATION FOR ITS REVIEW,
UPON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SUCH NEW VALUES THE PROPERTY OWNER OR OWNERS
SHOULD BE NOTIFIED OF THE CHANGE IN ASSESSMENT MADE BY THE [qUALIZATION
BOARD AND BE GIVEN A TIME AND PLACE THAT HE MAY APPEAR AND EXPRESS HIS
VIEWS. UPON THE NEW ASSESSMENT BEING COMPLETED BY THE BOARD OF [qUALI-
ZATION THE NEW VALUES WOULD BE IN EFFECT UNTIL CHANGED BY THE BOARD OF
EQUALIZATION OR THE REASSESSMENT EVERY SIX YEARS.
SUCH EQUALIZATION BOARD CAN BE EXPECTED TO MEET AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH TO
CONSIDER CHANGES AND HEAR COMPLAINTS. ANY AGGRIEVED PROPERTY OWNER CAN
THEN APPEAL TO THE COURTS AS PROVIDED BY LAW.
NO NEW LEGISLATION OR ORDINANCES ARE NEEDED TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS
REPORT, VIRGINIA CODE ALLOWS ANY LOCALITY WITH THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE.FORM OF GOVERN-
MENT TO PROVIDE FOR AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF ITS ASSESSMENT OF REAL PROPERTY. HEREWITH IS
A COPY OF A PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR THE BOARD'S CONSIDERATION WHICH WOULD INSTRUCT
THE DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT TO PROVIDE AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF AN~EQ~ALIZA-
TION OF ASSESSMENTS OF REAL ESTATE. PLEASE NOTE THAT NO INCREASE OR DECREASE IN
ASSESSMENT CAN BE MADE WITHOUT DUE NOTICE BY MAIL TO THE PROPERTY OWNER AT HIS LAST
KNOWN ADDRESS AND AN OPPORTUNITY FOR HIS VIEWS TO BE MADE KNOWN.
IT IS REALIZED THAT A CONTINUOUS REAPPRAISAL AND REVIEW OF REAL PROPERTY AS L~STED
ABOVE WILL INCREASE THE WORK LOAD IN THE DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT.
THEREFORE~ IT IS THE OPINION.OF THIS COMMITTEE THAT ONE ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEE IS
NEEDED TO ASSIST THE DEPARTMENT IN THE CONTINUOUS REVIEW OF ASSESSMENT, THIS
EMPLOYEE SHOULD HAVE SOME ABILITY IN DRAFTING AND OFFICE WORK IN ORDER THAT THE
COUNTY TAX MAPS MAY BE KEPT CURRENT·
ALSO~ THIS EMPLOYEE CAN ASSIST IN READING DEEDS~ MAKING TRANSFERS AND OFFICE
WORK~ THEREBY RELIEVING THE D~RECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THESE DUTIES WHICH
HE NOW PERFORMS, THIS. WILL ALLOW THE ACTUAL FIELD WORK TO BE PROVIDED BY THE
TWO APPRAISERS IN THE DEPARTMENT°
THE COMMITTEE FEELS THAT THE ABOVE RECOMMENDATIONS WILL IMPROVE THE ~THODS OF
ASSESSMENT IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO PROTECT THE
PROPERTY OWNER'S RIGHT OF REVIEW OF HIS ASSESSMENT. AT THE SAME TIME~ THE
CONTINUOUS REVIEW WILL ALLOW THE BORRD OF EQUALIZATION TO STRIVE FOR GREATER
EQUALITY,ff
IN THE DISCUSSION WHICH FOLLOWED THE SUBMISSION OF THE ABOVE REPORT~JR, THRAVES STATED THAT
HE WAS IN FAVOR OF REASSESSMENT EVERY SIX YEARS BUT OPPOSED TO A CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT. ON
MOTION OF ~Ro KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PALMER~ THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE WAS ACCEPTED AND
THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION ADOPTED~ [~IRo THRAVES CASTING THE ONLY DISSENTING VOTE:
BY THIS RESOLUTION THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO
BEGIN A CONTINUOUS REVIEW OF REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT~ MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS
TO THE BOARD OF E~UAL1ZATtON WHENEVER IT iS APPARENT THAT EXISTING ASSESSED
VALUES ARE INCONSISTENT WITH FAIR MARKET VALUES; AND
THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION IS URGED TO SELECT A TIME AND PLACE FOR
MEETING~ DULY ADVERTISED~ WHEREBY CITIZENS CAN APPEAR AND MAKE THEIR VIEWS
KNOWN; AND
THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION IS FURTHER URGED TO STRIVE FOR EQUALITY
IN REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT AND TO REVIEW VALUES~ DECREASING OR INCREASING TH'EM~
WHETHER A SPECIFIC COMPLAINT HAS BEEN RECEIVED OR NOT; AND
WHENEVER A VALUE IS CHANGED~ AN APPROPRIATE NOTICE SHOULD BE SENT TO
THE PROPERTY OWNER AT HIS LAST KNOWN ADDRESS NOTIFYING HIM OF SUCH CHANGE AND
GIVING HIM A CHANCE TO MAKE HIS VIEWS KNOWN WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME.
THE JOINT CHILDREN'S SERVICE CENTER COMMITTEE AND REPRESENTATIVES OF U.G,F. MET WITH
THE BOARD FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH REGARD TO THE CHILDREN'S SERVICE CENTER. FOR THE
BENEFIT OF THO~PRESENT~ ~R. GEORGE PALMER READ REPORT OF SAID COMMITTEE WHICH WAS PRESENTED
AND ADOPTED ON DECEMBER ~ 1~ WHICH REPORT CALLED ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT THE
CHILDREN'S SERVICE CENTER WAS A PART OF U.G.F. WHEN IT WAS ENDORSED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING
BODIES AND IF THIS OR OTHER AGENCIES ARE TO BE ELIMINATED~ THE COUNTY AND CITY SHOULD RE--
EVALUATE THEIR ENDORSEMENT.
MR. CHANNING DANIEL STATED THAT THE POSITION OF U.GoF. HAD NOT CHANGED~ THAT THE
CHILDREN'S SERVICE CENTER SHOULD BE TAX SUPPORTED AN9 THAT AN ORDERLY PLAN OF TRANSITION
ALONG THESE LINES HAS BEEN THE TREND THROUGHOUT THE NATION. HE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD MR.
JOHN GARBER~ STATE U.G.F. DIRECTOR~ WHO CITED A NUMBER OF INSTANCES IN VIRGINIA ~HERE THE
LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES HAD TAKEN OVER THE LOCAL SUPPORT OF THE CHILDREN'S SERVICE CENTER.
AFTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION OF THE MATTER~ ~Ro JAMES Eo BOWEN STATED THAT NONE OF
THE INFORMATION PRESENTED AT THIS MEETING HAD INFLUENCED HIS THINKING IN THE MATTER AND IT
,WAS THE GENERAL CONSENSUS OF OPINION AMONG THOSE SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY AND COUNTY
THAT THE GOVERNING BODIES NOT ALTER THEIR PREVIOUS ACTION.
MR. BROWN ADVISED THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD HAD REQUESTED AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT
OF $36~000,00 FOR THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN RIO ROAD AND ROUTE 29 IN WOO~--
BROOK SUBDIVISION FOR THE LOCATION OF ONE OF THE PROPOSED UUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS. HE ALSO
RRESENTED TO EACH MEMBER OF THE BOARD FACTORS PREPARED BY THE SCHOOL BOARD OFFICE WHICH
WERE CONSIDERED IN THE LOCATION OF NEW SCHOOLS. ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY i~/~R,
YANCEY~ RULES WITH REGARD TO SECOND READING WERE SUSPENDED AND THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION
5'~: ..... --~Z-~ ?~LLZW:::Z ~ ......... WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE' AYES -
MESSRS. GARNETT~ KIRKSEY~ PALMER, PAULETT, THRAVES AND YANCEY. NAYS - NONE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, THAT $36,000.00 BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY APPROPRIATED
FOR THE PURCHASE OF LAND TO BE USED FOR ONE OF THE PROPOSED dUNIOR HIGH
SCHOOLS.
MR. BARNETT, CHAIRMAN~ APPOINTED THE FOLLOWING STANDING COMMITTEES FOR THE YEAR
1965:
AIRPORT COMMITTEE=
THRAVES
PALMER
BROWN
INSURANCE COMMITTEE=
KtRKSEY
PALMER
BROWN
CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:
PALMER
GARNETT
THRAVES
YANCEY
CROZET SERVIC~,CO,MMITTEE:
GARNETT
YANCEY
BROWN
DISTRICT HOME:
YANCEY
BROWN
DUtVPS COMMITTEE:
YANCEY
PAULETT
THRAVES
PALMER
FINANCE COMMITTEE:
BOARD TO SERVE AS A
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
HUNTING COI~ITTEE:
THRAVES
PAULETT
INDUSTRIAL CO'MISSION:
KIRKSEY
PAULETT
NOTE:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE:
GARNET.T
BROWN
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE:
BOARD TO SERVE AS A
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
PLANNING COMMISSION:
K~RKSEY
BROWN
SIMMS
P.A.S. REPORT COMMITTEE:
PALMER
PAULETT
KIRKSEY
BROWN
SHERIFF'S COMMITTEE:
THEAVES
PAULETT
YANCEY
KIRKSEY
~gLFARE BOARD:
THRAVES
NO COMMITTEE IS TO TAKE FINAL ACTION, OR ANY
ACTION BINDING THE BOARD, WITHOUT APPROVAL
OF BOARD IN REGULAR OR SPECIAL MEETING.
REQUEST WAS RECEIVED FROM WEST LEIGH PROPERTY OWNERS! ASSOCIATION FOR STREET LIGHTS
TO BE INSTALLED AT THE WEST LE~GH INTERSECTION WITH ROUTE 250 AND AT THE RAILROAD CROSSING.
IT WAS NOTED THAT VET~CO WOULD CHARGE ALBEMARLE COUNTY $199.00 FOR INSTALLATION AND ~1~OoO0
PER YEAR FOR OPERATING COSTS FOR THE TWO LIGHTS,THIS AlvtO~NT TO BE REIMBURSED BY THE ASSOCIATION.
ON RECOMMENDATION OF THE ASSISTANT COUNTY EXECUTIVE~ AND ON MOTION OF NRc KIRKSEY,
SECONDED-BY MR. PALMER, THE COUNTY WAS AUTHORIZED TO CONTRACT WITH THE VIRGINIA ELECTRIC
AND POWER COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SAID LIGHTS AS REQUESTED, PROVIDED THE PROPERTY
OWNERSI ASSOCIATION MAKES ADVANCE DEPOSIT TO THE COUNTY COVERING THE INSTALLATION .CHARGE
AND OPERATING COSTS FOR ONE YEAR.
MR. BROWN ADVISED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD REQUESTED EACH OF THE FOUR LOCAL BANKS TO
FURNISH INTEREST RATES THEY WOULD PAY FOR VARIOUS LENGTHS OF TIME IN ORDER TO INSURE THAT
ALL FUNDS ON HAND WILL DRAW THE MAXIMUM INTEREST. HE PRESENTED THE FOLLOWING RATES RE-
CEIVED FROM SAID BANKS:
FOR THE VIRGINIA NATIONAL BANK CITIZENS BANK ~3NTICELLO
PERIOD OF NATIONAL AND TRUST Co. AND TRUST CO. NATIONAL
1 MONTH 3 % 33 % -~'.~ % 2
2 MONTHS 3~ 3--3/8 - 2½
3 MONTHS 3½ 3-3/8 3 3
4 MONTHS 3½ 3-3/8
6 MONTHS 3-3/4 3~ 3~
8 MONTHS 4 3-3/4 3~ 3½
12 MONTHS 4 4 4 4
BROWN STATED THAT IT APPEARED THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE APPROXIMATELY $900,000.00 IN
WORKING FUNDS WHICH CAN BE PLACED ON VARIOUS TIME ACCOUNTS AND RECOMMENDED THE FOLLOWING
TIME DEPOSITS BE MADE:
MONTH $150,000.00 3-1/4% NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST Co. DUE: MARCH 29
MONTHS 170,O00.00 3-3/8%-3> NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST Co. DUE: APRIL 29
MONTHS 75,000.00 3-1/2% VIRGINIA NATIONAL BANK DUE: MAY 29
MONTHS 175,000.00 3--1/2% VIRGINIA NATIONAL BANK DUE: dUNE 29
MONTHS 75,000.00 3-1/2% VIRGINIA NATIONAL BANK DUE: dULY 29
MONTHS 150,000.00 3-3/4% VIRGINIA NATIONAL BANK DUE: AUGUST 29
MONTHS 100,000.00 3-3/4% VIRGINIA NATIONAL BANK DUE: SEPT. 29
MR. BROWN ALSO ADVISED THAT HE PLANNED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE SERVICE AUTHORITY DESIGNATE
THE [~J~3NTIOELLO NATIONAL BANK AS ITS DEPOSITORY AND ALLOW WATER RENTS TO BE PAID AT SAID
BANK BY WATER CUSTOMERS. ON MOTION OF MR. THRAVES, SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY, THE RECOMMEN-
DATION OF MR. BROWN WAS APPROVED. ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER, SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY MR.
0TIS L. BROWN WAS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN TRANSFER CHECKS ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY IN ORDER THAT
THE FOREGOING MIGHT BE ACCOMPLISHED.
MR. BROWN ADVISED THAT HE HAD BEEN APPROACHED BY THE WATER CONTROL BOARD OF THE
STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT WITH REGARD TO THE GROWING NEED FOR SEWERAGE FACILITIES IN CROZET.
AFTER DISCUSSION OF THIS MATTER AND ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER, SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ THE
COUNTY EXECUTIVEIS OFFICE WAS AUTHORIZED TO EMPLOY ARCHITECTS TO MAKE FEASIBILITY STUDY IN
THIS REGARD.
MR. PAULETT PRESENTED TWO qUESTIONNAIRES HE 'HAD RECEIVED FROM THE STATE CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE. ON MOTION OF MR. PAULETT, SECONDE~ BY MR. KIRKSEY, THE ASST. CouNTy EXECUTIVE
WAS REQUESTED TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THESE qUESTIONNAIRES.
MR. PALMER STATED HE WOULD LIKE A REPORT ON THE STATUS OF VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS. MR.
KIRKSEY ADVISE~ THAT HE HAD BEEN IN CONTACT WITH ~tJ~R. ROSCOE ADAMS WHO HAD INDICATED THAT
A REPORT WOULD PROBABLY BE MADE AT THE NEXT MEETING OF THE BOARD. ~V~R. PAUL CALE APPEARED
WITH REGARD TO THIS MATTER AND WAS REQUESTED TO ASK MRo ADAMS FOR A REPORT AT THE MARCH
MEETING OF THIS BOARD.
NOTICE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY ADVISING THAT PUBLIC HEARING
WOULD BE HELD AT 10:00 AcM. ON APRIL 6~ 1965~ ON THE INTENT OF SAID COMPANY TO DISCONTINUE
IT AGENCY AT RED HILL~ VIRGINIA. MR. YANCEY WAS REQUESTED TO 0ONTACT PERSONS IN THE RED
HILL AREA WITH REGARD TO THEIR FEELINGS IN THE MA¥~ER AND TO REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD AT
ITS NEXT REGULAR MEETING.
CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY AMOUNTING TO $359,076.36 WERE PRESENTED, EXAMINED, AND
ALLOWED AND CERTIFIED TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FOR PAYMENT AND CHARGED AGAINST THE
FOLLOWING FUNDSt
GENERAL REVENUE FUND
GENERAL OPERATING FUND
SCHOOL OPERATING FUND
VIRGINia PUBLIC ASSISTANCE FUND
SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION #1
SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION #2
CAFETERIA FUND
TEXTBOOK FUNS
DOG TAX FUND
CROZET SANITARY DISTR],QT FUND
UClNTIRE TRUST FaND
CENTRAL FIRE DISTRUCT FUND
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FUND
4,710.07
3b,629.97
212,,008.08
23,785.50
19,/+. 92
39,600.00
3,485.34
1,061.10
683.?0
12,630.21
2,667. ?8
6.OO
112.10
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CURRENT CREDIT ACCOUNT 21,501.59
TOTAL $ 359.076.36
ON MOTION THE MEETING WAS ADdOURNEDo