Loading...
1962-02-15 A regular meeting of the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, ¥irginia, was held at the Office Building of said County on the l~th day of February, 1962. Present: Messrs. John W. Williams, Edgar N. Garnett, H. Ashby Harris, George C. Palmer, II, M. Y. Sutherland~ Jr. and Robert Thraves. Absent: None. Officers present: County Executive, Asst. County Executive and Commonwealth's Attorney. The meeting opened with the Lord's Prayer led by Mr. Pence. Ninutes of the meeting of January 15, 1952, were read and approved. Several citizens appeared and requested inclusion into the Secondary System of an extension of Route 6~1 for approximately one mile to connect with Route 777° Those presented were requested to file regular application on this request so that the matter might be referred to Road Viewers.. Request was received for inclusion into the Secondary System of road~ off of Route 685 near Ke~wick, a private road serving five families and being .3 mile in length, it was ordered that this request also be referred to Road Viewers. Request was received for inclusion into the S Secondary ystem of road off Route 795 near Scott~ville, a private road being 150 yards in length. It was ordered that this request be referred to Road Viewers. Request was received for improvement to approximately l½ mile of Route 640. The Chairman ad- vised the petition to come back to the regular March meeting regarding this request. The matter of setting the annual highway meeting for March was discussed, however, no action was taken on the matter. Mr. Thomas Michie, appearing on behalf of the Junior Chamber of Commerce, requested an appro- priation of funds to match funds donated by Civi~ Clubs, not exceeding $2,000.00, for the planting of trees along that section of the Route 250 By-Pass in Albemarle County. After careful consideration of this request, motion was offered by Mr. Palmer, seconded by Mr. Harris and unanimously adopted, approv- ing the idea as submitted By Mr. Michie but denying the request due to the fact that the County is now committed to a number of capital outlay projects an8 also due to the fact that it was the feeling of the Board that such an appropriation could establish a precedent whereby other civic clubs would feel en- titled to appropriations for similar projects. Communication was received from Mr. Walker C. Williams, Attorney, requesting the abandonment of a certain section of o~ ~oute 20, which section of road was no longer used. On motion of ~r. Harris seconded by Nr. Sutherland, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: W~TE~EA8, some years ago, Route 20, South, was altered and some sections were relocated; and ~HE~EAS, such relocation resulted in the alteration of a portion of old Route 20 in front of property conveyed to David M. Taylor and Helen H. Taylor by Nilliam A. Revis and wife by deed dated December 29, 1961, and a new road which serves the same citizens as the old road was constructed; and ~EREAd, Section 33-76.12 of the Code of Virginia provides for the abandonment of such alteration of the Secondary Road System; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that said old road be and the same is hereby vacated and abandoned as follows: That section of old Route. ~0, South, shown within boundary of tract ef land conveyed to David ~. Taylor and Helen H. Taylor by ~illiam A. R~vis and wife by deed dated December 29, 196~, and being shown on plat recorded in the Albemarle County Clerk's Office on January2, 1962, Deed Book 375, page 49. BE IT FUR~HE~R~8OLVED that the Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby Communication was received from the Virginia Department of Highways advising that in accor- dance with resolution of this Board of October 19, 1961, changes in the Primary and Secondary Systems made necessary b~relocation and construction of Route 20 were confirmed by that department on January 12, 1962, as shown on sketch received and ordered ~iled, and described as follows: Section i - Old location of Route 20 north of the new location, from inter- section of Route 250 easterly O.773 miles to the new location at Station 39~00~ Section 2 - Old location of Route 20 north of the new location, from Station 63~00 easterly 0.42& mile to the new loc~tion at Station 83~00. These two sections being transferred to the Secondary System as provided under Section 33-27 of the 1950 Code of Virginia. Mr. Robert Thraves, chairman of the hunting committee, gave report regarding his committee's study rmlating to control of rabies among fomes in the County. He stated that his committee wanted to do whatever conditions warrant. However, he wished to meet with farmers and hunters to discuss this matter further and advised that he would call such a meeting in the near future and also request Mr. Swink of the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries to attend the meeting. Mr. Thraves stated that his committee would make further report at the March Board meeting. The following persons were appointed to serve on the 1962 Board of Viewers: Mr. Jack Page Mr. Steve McCauley Mr. Campbell Holt Mr. John B~ Hogan Mr. John W. Clayton Plat was received on redivision of land owned by Nr. Leroy Snow, located on Old Lynchburg Road, as prepared by Mr. T. N. Saunders, and approved by the County Plan~ing Commission. On motion of Mr. Sutherland, seconded by Mr. Thraves, this plat was approved and the Chairman and Clerk were authorized to sign same on behalf of this Board . Plat was received on subdivision of lots 8 and ll owned by Leroy Snow and locatAd 8 miles south east on Route 620, as prepared by Mr. T. W. Saunders and aDproved by the County Planning Commis- sion. On motion of Mr. Palmer, seconded by Mr. Harris, t~is plat was approved and the Chairman and Clerk were authorized to sign same on behalf of this Board. PTat was received on revision of lots A and B to lots 71 and 72, Block l, ~onte~Vista Sub- division, as Prepared by Nr. Willia~S. Roudabush and approved by the County and City Planning Commis- sions. On motion of Mr. Garnett, seconded by Mr. Palmer, this plat was approved and the Chairman and Clerk were authorized to sign same on behalf of this Board. Plat w~s r~ceived on division of Lot 2, property owned by Robert E. Bargamin and located on Route 685 and Old Main Street, Crozet, Virginia, as prepared by Mr. William S. Roudabush and approved by the County Planning Commission. On motion of Mr. Garnett, seconded by Mr. P~mer, this plat was approved and the Chairman and Clerk were authorized' to sign same on behalf of this Board. Plat was received on land divided from larger tract owned by C. E. Herndon and located on Route 631 (Rio Roa~) as prepared by Mr. William S. Roudabush and approved by the County and City Plan- ning Commissions. On motion of Mr. Palmer, Seconded by Mr. Garnett, this plat was approved and the Chairman and Clerk were authorized to sign same on behalf of this Board. On motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, plat on Section 3, Block J, Woodbrook Sub- division was rejected until specifications are met. Plat was received on division of tract owned by Leroy Snow and located at the intersection of Route 640 and Route 20, as prepared by Mr. ~illiam S. Roudabush and approved by the Co~uuty Planning Commission. On motion of ~r. Thraves, seconded by Mr. Sutherland, this plat was approved and the Chairman and Clerk were authorized to sign same on behalf of this Board. Plat was rSceived on division of land owned by N. E. Morris and located between Old Houte 20 ~orth and new Route 20, North, as prepared by Mr. B. Aubrey Huffman and approved by the County and Cit Planning Commissions. On motion of Mr. Garnett, seconded by Nr. Palmer, this plat was approved and Plat was received on revisions of page 1, section 3, Hessian Hills Subdivision, as prepared by Mr. Amos R. Sweet and approved by the County and City Planning Commissions. On motion of Mr. Palmer seconded by Mr. Garneit, this plat was approved and the Chairman and Clerk were authorized to sign same on behalf of this Board. Plat was received on Section t, Johnson Village, as prepared by Mr. Amos Sweet and approved by the County and City Planning Commissions. On motion of Mr.. Sutherl~nd, seconded by Mr. Harris, this plat was approved, and the Chairman and Clerk were authorized to sign same, subject to signatures by the City Plar~uing 'Commissioh. Plat was received on division of land owned by Marg~ret E. Moon and located on Route 20, South, as prepared by Mr. 0.~ R. Randolph and approved by the County Planning Commission. On motion of Mr. Garnett, seconded by Mr. Palmer, this plat was approved and the Chairman and Clerk were authorized to sign same on behalf of this Board. P%at was received on subdivision of land on Route ?LO near Cismont owned by Alex Chapman and Harry Dickerson, as prepared by Mr. O. R. Randolph and, approved by the County Planning Commission. On motion of Mr. Thraves, seconded by Mr. Sutherland, this plat was approved and the Chairman and Clerk were authorized to sign same on behalf of this Board, subject to signatures of the Planning Commission. The Chairman called for public hearing as per the following notice which was published in the daily Progress on January 27 and February 3, 1962: "Notice is hereby given that at a regular meeting of the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, to be held on February 15, 1962, it is intended to adopt ~ SANITATION 0RDIN~NCE, and public hearing on same has been set for 10~'00 A.M. on said date.. By Order of the Board of County Supervisors." After discussion by the Board, ~here being no one from-the public to be heard with regard to this matter, said Ordinance was adopted as follows and was ordered published in synopsis form in the Daily Progress in accordance with law, with the full text bei~g~gfiled .with the Clerk of the Circuit Court, by the follOWing recorded vote: Ayes - Messrs. Williams, Garnett, Harris, Palmer, Sutherland, and Thraves. Nays - None, (Ordinance follows on page ~96) .A,,LBE~ltLE 00UNTY SANITATION ORDINANCE ~E IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors ,of Albemarle C~u~ty, Virginia, that the following ordinance be enacted by the said Board, to-wit: ~ECTION I. It shall be unlawful for the, owner of any house used as a human habitation, or other place where h~m~n beings congregate or are employed in the County of Albemarle to use or occupy; or to rent or lease the same for the us~ or 'occupancy by any person, firm or corporation :,~!ess and until the said house or building shall have been supplied or equipped with an approve~ method of disposal of 'human excrement of such conStruction as will comply with the requirements hereinafter designated. SECTION II. That for the purpose of this ordinance "an approved method of disposal of human excrement" shall be d.eemed tO be either. (a) A properly installed flush toilet connected to a public or approved private sewer; (b) A flush toilet connected to an approved properlY in~talle~ ~eptic tank system; (c) A flush toilet connected to an approved sewage disposal plant, publicly or privately owned; (d) An-approve~ pit privy. The terms "install", "approved", and. "standa~rd", as used in this ordinance, shall be construed to mean "in accordance with the specifications and standards established within this ordinance." The term "Health Department" shall mean the Albemarle County Health Director or his duly authorized representative, the SanitatiOn Officer. SECTION III. Before construction is begun on any sewage diaposal system net specifically covered By this. ordinance, plan shall be presented to the State Health DePartment for approval and for submission to~ the State Water Con- trol Board, if that agency's approval is required. SECTION IV. Procedure for the installation of a septic tank sy~m: The Permit .to I~tall Septic Tank Systems: A~ It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to install, have installed, allow to be installed, or contract to install, a septic tank system for another person, firm or corporation without first making aPPlica- tion to the Health Director of the County for a septic ta~ permit em appli- cation forms furnishe~ by the said Health Director. The application fern shall contain clearly a description, location and dimensions of the land or lot on which the septic tank, distribution box and sewer piping are t~ be installed, the dimensions of the purification field, the type of land (such .as loam,~ sandy loam, clay, gravel, etc.), the direction in which the land drains in relation to reservoirs, springs and wells, and be accom- panied by a plot of the land, when reqUired, showing the location of dwelling house and all other buildings, and the plans and specifications of the whole septic tank system intended to be installed; and upon approval of such application, the Health Director shall issue a permit to the applicant fo~ the install, ation of such. septic tank system in accordance, with the plans and s?ecificatmons ~fur~ished~ and if the said plans are not approved, b~ut the size and location of the lot and type of Soil are suitable for a septic tank system,, properly planned, the Health Director s~ ~early ou+~line the proper plans for same and grant the permit only ~rding to the Plans sO outlined by him~ On motion of ~r. Garnett, seconded by Mr. Palmer, public heaving on proposed amended Sub- division Ordinance was carried over to the regular ~arch 15, 1962, Board Neeting. Statements of Expenses of the Department of Finance, the Sheriff's Office, the Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney for the month of January, 1965, were presented, and on motion of Mr. Thraves, seconded by Mr. Sutherland, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Statement of Expenses incurzed in the maintenance of the County Jail was submitted along with St~mmary Statement of Prisoner Days for the month of January, 1962. On motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Claim of the Jail Physician for the month of January, 1962, in the amount of $14.00 was presented, and on motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by ~r. Garnett, was approved for payment. Reports of th~ Department of Public Welfare for the month of January, 1962, were presented in accordance with Sections 63-67.1 and 63-67.2 of the Code of Virginia. ~laim of the University of Virginia Hospital in the amount of $862.75 for hospitalization of indigent patients was received and on motion of ~r. Sutherland, seconded by~r. Thraves, was approved for payment. Claim of the County Executive for the month of January, 1962, was presented, approved, and SECTION V. Detail~ of SPeCifications for septic tank ~ystems. A. All septic tank systems i~stall~d in ~mis county shall consist of sewer line from buiI~g t° tank, SeP~i~' rink, distribution box, and draim tile purifi- cation field.. The sewe~ l~e shall be of vitrified clay pipe,- cas~ iron soil pipe, transite pipe, or"bitnminized pipe. The entire system shall be Built [u accordance with ~;e plans and specifications shown on the permit, A representative of th~ Co,~nty Health Department shall inspect septic tamk construction after comple2ion and before any part of the system shall be covered. Septic tank systems 'shall be BaCk-filled immediately, after inspec- tion and apProved, ~nd care shall be taken net to disturb the pipe, grades, Joints or alignment by the backfilling, or otherwise. B. Ail house sewer pipes shall be laid complete with all jointing~.~te~i:~al~.~., Ail house sewe~ cast L~on pipe shalI be jointed with lead and ~ o~ simila~ Jointing material. Clean ~uta s~all be installed~vhe~e turns ~f'45 degrees or greater are necessary a~d .where straight r~n~;i~e lin excess of 95 fee%. Ail right bends in the ~ouse shall be made wi2ht~ng sweep soil pipe ells. C. Location, Design, Liquid capaci~2 and ~teriA1 required in Septic Tank -Disposal Systems: 1. Location and installatio~of :.the sewage disposal system and each part thereof .sh. all be such 't~, ~i.~th reasonable maintenance, .it will function in a sanitary manner.and. ~1 not create a nuisance nor endanger the safety of any domeSt.xc wat~ ~Supply. In determining a suitable location for the system, considerati5n shall be given to the Size and shape of the lot, slope of natUral and finished grade, depth of ground water table, proximity to existing or future water supplies, and possible expansion of the systems a. No part of the ~system shall be located so that it i~ nearer to any water supply thah 50 feet, er so that surface drainage from its l~cation may reach any domestic water sUpply. The lot size shall be ~ufficient te permit proper lo~ation, installation and ~P~ration. e. Installation in lo~ s~ampy areas or areas with high water table and/or ~hich may be subject' to flooding are prohibited. Type of system~ shall be determined on a ~asis of location, permeability and ground water level' The system shall be designed to receive all sanitary sewage from the dwel_~ug~ BaSement floor, footing, or roof drainage shall not enter any pax~ of the septic tank system. Design of the septic tank shall be rectangular in shape and the length shs. ll not be less than twice nor more than three times the width. The liquid depth shall be not less than four feet ~_nd. the freeboard or air- space shall not be less than one foot. On motion of Mr. Garnett, seconded by Mr. Palmer, public hearing on proposed amended Sub- division Ordinance was carried over to the regular March 15, 1962,-Board Meeting. Statements of Expenses of the Department of Finance, the Sheriff's Office, the Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney for the month of JanUary, 196~, were presented, and on motion of Mr. Thraves, seconded by Mr. Suthertand, ~Bese Statements were examined, verified and approved. Statement of Expenses incurred in the maintAnance of the County Jail was submitted along with Summary Statement of Prisoner Days for the month o£ January, 1962. On motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Claim of the Jail Physician for the month o£ January, 1962, in the amount o£ $14.00 was presented, and on motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, was approved for payment. Reports o£ the Department of Public Welfare for the month o£ January, 1962, were presented in accordance with Sections 63-67.1 and 63-67.2 of the Code of Virginia. ~laim of the University of Virginia Hospital in the amount of $862.75 for hospitalization of indigent patients was received and on motion of ~r. Sutherland, seconded by~r. Thraves, was approved for payment4 Claim of the County Executive for the month of January, 1962, was presented, approved, and 4. Liquid capacity ef all septic tanks shall be based upon the number of bedrooms contemplated in the building served and shall conform 'to Table I, herein shoVmo TABLE I - CAPACITY OF SEPTIC TAh~ Potential Capa- city Of Home -- Ng~ of ._Bedroom_s 3 or less 4 6 Capacity of Septic Tank ...... Gallons- Dimensions of Sop.ti, c Tank B C D Wid~th ~!r~ __ Snace L. i,~uid Deoth 720 .7'0" 3'6" 1'0" 4'0" 1000 8'0" 4'0" 1;0" A'O" 1250 9'0" 4'6" t'~" · ' '~ 4'3" 14 o A,6,, 1720 4'8" Construe~ie~ df the ~ shall be such as to assure its being water- tight ~ prevent the entrance of rain water or surface drainage. Th~ tank shall be constructed of sound and durable material not subject to excessive corrosion or decay. bo Adequate access to each compartment of the tank, for inspection and sludge removal, shall be provided by a manhole or removable cover. (1) Where the top of the tank .is located more than 24 inches below ~he surface of the ground, manholes shall be built up to ~ithin 12 to 18 inches of the surface. c. Inlet an~ outlet connections shall be submerged or baffled to assure the leas~ possible disturbance in the tank~ The inlet pipe o~ baffle shall extend approximately 6 inches above the water surface, and the outlet ~hall extend approxi- mately 2 ft. below and 6 inches above the water surface. (2) Satisfactory venting of the tank shall be provided through the inlet and main building stack. The outlet shall be similarly vented to provide proper ventilation of the disposal field or seepage pits back into the septic tank and thence through the main building stack. d: Septic tanks shall be of poured-in-place concrete, or precast con- crete, or brick wall, or cinder block wall, or properly coated metal. (1) Concrete septic tanks, poured in place, shall be poured with a standard concrete mixture of 1-2-3 or 1-2-4 mix. Where the excavation is subject to caving, or where the rater table is objectionably high, outside forms and pumping ~ill be required in order to assure a watertight tank. The walls, top and bottom of. the tank are to be not less than 4" thick, as sho~n on plans; top and manhole cover to be reinforced with reinforc- ing Ste~, as shovm on plans. On motion of ~r. G~rnett, seconded by Mr. Palmer, public hearing on proposed amended Sub- division Ordinance was carried over to the regular ~{arch 15, 1962, Board Neeting. Statements of Expenses of the Department of Finance, the Sheriff's Office, the Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney for the month of January, 1965, were prese.nted, and on motion of ~r. ~raves, seconded by ~r. Sutherland, these Statements were examined, verifi~ and approved. Statement of Expenses inc~ed in the maint~ance of the Co~ty Ja~ was submitted along with S~ary Statement of Prisoner Days for the month of January, 1962. On motion of ~r. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Claim of the Jail Physici~ for the month of Jan~ry, 1962, in the amo~t of $14.OO was present~, and on motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by ~r. Garnett, was approved for pa~ent. Reports of the Department of Public Welfare for the month of January, 1962, were presented in acco~ance with Sections 63-67.1 and 63-67.2 of the Code of Virginia. ~aim of the University of Virginia Hospit~ in the ~o~t of $8~.75 for hospitalization of indigent patients was received and on motion of Mr. Sutherland, seconded by Mr. Thraves, was approved for pa~ent, Claim of the Cowry Executive for the month of January, 1962, was presented, approved, and -4- Precast concrete tanks shall be efa design as shown on plan., and size as stated on permit,' and-made with a standard 1~2-3 mixture, The wa~ls shall mot be l~ss than 2~,, in thickness, reinforced .with NO. 9 steel placed as shown on plan. D. SUBSURFACE P~RIFICATION FIELD: 1. Loeatio~ of the purification field should be in an unobstructed and shaded area, and the distance given shall be the minimum which the disposal field can be located from the following: (a) Any ~ater supply (exeept as noted below) .... . . 50 feet (b) Streams . . . ..~ . . . . . .... . . . . o . . . ,. 25 feet (o) Dwellings . . .~.. ....... . . . . . . . . . . 10 feet (d) Large Trees . ~ . . . ................. t0 feet (e) Property lines ,....... · . · . . · . · . . . - 10 feet Distribution Box of sufficient size to accomedate the necessary field lateral lines shall be constructed at the head of each purification field. a. Each field lateral line shall be connected separately to the distribution bo~ and shall not be subdivided. b. The invert of all autlets shall be level and the inlet invert shall be at least 1 inch above the outlets. 3. Minimum Seepage Area (total flat bottom of trenches) of the purification field shall be determined by one of the following methods: Recommendation based upon experience data, in which case require~ merits shall be stated on a basis of square feet of absorptive area per bedroom rather than lineal feet of tile. Results of actual percolation tests conducted on the site o~' proposed purification field. Such tests shall be made by the owner under, the direct aupervision of the Health Department and in accordance with a standard procedure as recommended by the Virginia State Health Department. c. Determination of Absorptive Area from Results of Percolation Tests Shall be in Accordance with the Following Table: Average Time in Hinutes Fo~ Water Level to' Lower _One Inch 10 minutes or less ll-20minutes 21-30 minutes 31-40 minutes 41-50minutes 51-60 minutes Over 60minutes Effective Absorption Area (Area in bottom:ofdisposal, trench)'inSquare Feet ~r Bedroomor per 100 gal, per-: da~.of~..esttmated.water use ...... 130 210 25O 29O 330 Unsuitable for subsurface drainage On motion of Mr. Garnett, seconded by Mr. Palmer, public hearing on proposed amended Sub- division Ordinance was carried over to the regular March 15, 1962, Board Meeting. Statements of Expenses of the Department of Finance, the Sheriff's Office, the Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney for the month of January, 196~, were presented, and onmotion of Mr. Thraves, seconded by Mr. Sutherland, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Statement of Expenses incurzed in the maintenance of the County Jail was submitted along with S~nm~ary Statement of Prisoner Days for the month of January, 1962. On motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Claim of the Jail Physician for the month of January, 1962, in the amount of $14.OO was presented, and on motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, was approved for payment. Reports of the Department of Public Welfare for the month of January, 1962, were presented in accordance with Sections 63-67.1 and 63-67.2 of the Code of Virginia. ~laim of the University of Virginia Hospital in the amount of $862.75 for hospitalization of indigent patients was received and on motion of Mr. Sutherland, seconded by Mr. Thraves, was approved for payment, Claim of the County Executive for the month of January, 1962, was presented, approved, and Hinimum installation shall be for a two-bedroom horse. Construction shall be in accordance with the following specifications: (a) Ail trenches in a purification field shall be the same width and length, and the foilowing st~n~ dards shall be required: (1) Minimum n~mber of lines per field, 2. (2) ~ximum length of individual lines, 100 feet. (3) Minimum bottom width of trench, 18 inches. (4) Naximum depth of cover of tile lines, 24 inches. (5) Preferred depth of cover of tile lines, 16 inches. (6) Grade of tile lines . . . 2" to 4" per 100 feet. (?) Spacing of trenches . . . at least 6. feet apart. (8) Ninimum filter material under tile, 6 inches. (9) Minimum filter material over tile, 2 inches. Pipe used for the lines between the septic tank and distribution box, on all lines within 10 feet of dwelling, under paved areas and on all ma~n laterals~ from distribution box in fields constructe~ on sloping ground, shall be bell and spigot type of vitrified olay or concrete wi?h watertight joints or fiber pipes, Pipe used under driveWays or other areas subject to heavy loads shall b® bell and spigot cast iron with leaded joints. Such Sections laid in the purification field shall not be considered in determining the effective absorption area. (c) Field tile used in the purification field shall be not less than 4 inches in diameter and shall be laid with $ inch open Joints. (1) Ail open joints shall be protected, on top,..by strips of asphalt-treated building paper at least 10 inches long and 3 ~ 6 inches wide. (2) Ail bends used in the purification field shall have a water- tight joint at each end of the. bend. Filter material shall be hard and durable, Of crushed stone, gravel, slag, or similar material. (e) (1) Such material may vary from --~ to 3 inches in size. Grade boards, securely staked in the bottom of the trench, or other means approved by the Joint Health Department, shall be provided to ~ure that the pipes shall be laid with a grade of 2 inches to 4 inches per hundred feet. On motion of Mr. Garnett, seconded by Mr. Palmer, public hearing on proposed amended Sub- division Ordinance was carried over to the regular March 15, 1962, Board Neeting. Statements of Expenses of the Department of Finance, the Sheriff's Office, the Of'fice of the Commonwealth's Attorney for the month of January, 1965, were presented, and on motion of ~r. Thraves, seconded by ~r. Suther!and, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Statement of Expenses incurred in the maintenance of the County Jail was submitted along with Summary Statement of Prisoner Days for the month of January, 1962. On motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Claim of the Jail Physician for the month of January, 1962, in the amo~t of $14.00 was presented, and on motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, was approved for payment. Reports of the Department of Public Welfare for the month of January, 1962, were presented in accordance with Sections 63-67.1 and 63-67.2 of the Code of Virginia. ~laim of the University of Virginia Hospital in the amount of $862.75 for hospitalization of indigent patients was received and on motion of Mr. Sutherland, seconded by~r. Thraves, was approved for payment, Claim of the County Executive for the month of January, 1962, was presented, approved, and SOTION~V', If, upon any inspection the Health Director er his authorize~ agent shall find any1 violations, of this ordinance and/or the previsions of the permit~ issued under it, he shall direct the person, firm or corporation to whom the permit was issued by v~itten notice to make the necessary corrections with- in such reasonable time as shall be specified ~therein. SECTION VI. It shall beunla~ul for any owner or any tenant or lessee of any premises properly supplied v~th a sanitary privy er flush toilet or other approved device for the disposal off,human excrement to misuse er neglect the same, so as to allow it or cause it to cease to be sanitary. SECTION VII, It shall be unlawful for any person, firm-or corporation to start any new subdivision or housing or housing development or dwelling before furnishing plans and specifications of the sewer sys.tem o~r sewage disposal system to be used, together with plans 'for the anticipated water System to be used fm the proposed structure or structures. These plans an~ specifications must be approved by the County Health ~Department before the issuance efa building permit°. ~ECTION VIII. No persons, firm or corporation shall engage in the business of cleaning septic tanks without an annual permit which shall be issued by the Joint Health Department and shall be renewable on December 31, of each year. The issuance 1of such ~ permit · Shall~be~ contingent upon (1) the approval by t. he Health Department of the e~uipment,, (2) satisfactory compliance with regulations as listed below, (3)'the payment-Sf 'a fee annually of $$.00 A. The tank into which the septic tank and carrie~, shall be fully enclosed ~ed Or delivered All inlets and outlets to such ~tank Shall be fully enclosed and provided with watertight valves. Suction and disch~rge~hose shall be watertight and provision shall be made for carrying such hose in a manner that will prevent any leakage therefrom. D. All exposed surfaces shall be painted and maintained in a sanitary condition-by £zequent waShings, E. The name and ad'ess ~of the person, firm or corporation owning or operating such equipment shall be painted thereon in letters at least 4 inches high. It shall be unlawful to dispose of the sludge and other material removed from septic tanks except by depositing it under the sur- face 'of the ground or in such other manner as may be approved by the Health Department~ SECTION IX. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to install a pit p~ivy in Albemarle C ounty except in accordance with plans and specifications which shall' be furnished on request. SECTION X. Any person, firm or corporation wh~ shall neglect, fail or refuse to comply with the pr~visions of this ordinance; the permit ~ u~der it as provided in Section IV, or the written notice within the time specified On motion of Nr. Garnett, seconded by Mr. Palmer, public hearing on proposed amended Sub- division Ordinance was carried over to the regular March 15, 1962,-Board Nesting. Statements of Expenses of the Department of Finance, the Sheriff's Office, the Office of the Co~onwealth's Attorney for the month of JanUary, 1965, were presented, and on motion of Mr. Thraves, seconded by Nr. Sutherland, ~hese Statements were exemined, verified and approved. Statement of Expenses incurred in the maintenance of the County Jail was submitted along With Summary Statement of Prisoner Days for the month of January, 1962. On motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Claim of the Jail Physician for the month of January, 1962, in the amount of $14.O0 was presented, and on motion of Nr. Harris, seconded by Nr. Garnett, was approved for payment. Reports of the Department of Public Nelfare for the month of January, 1962, were presented in accordance with Sections 63-67.1 and 63-67.2 of the Code of Virginia. ~laim of the University of Virginia Hospital in the amount of $862.75 for hospitalization of indigent patients was received and on motion of Mr. Sutherland, seconded by~r. Thraves, was approved for payment, Claim of the County Executive for the month of January, 1962, was presented, approved, and in ~uch notice, as provide~ in Section V, shall be guilty of a misdemean~er~ shall be fined not less than $10~00 nor more than $25.00; and each day's centinuance to so viOlate this ordinance, or any of its provisions, shall constitute a separate offen~eo SECTION XI. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with. the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION XII. Should any Section, paragraph,.~ sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, the remainder of said ordinance shall not be affected thereby. RE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that this ordinance be, ~and is~hereby, made effective on an after the 'J~'~ ~ day of . ~Y~g~ ~, 19~i. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that' the county COurt of this Ceunty be furr~shed~ with a certified copy of this ordinance, and that complaints for the offenses hereinabove set forth be prosecuted under the terms of this ordinance, and that~ all fines imposed under this ordinance shall be collected and paid te the credit of the Gen~al RevenueI ~d of this County. On motion of Mr. Garnett, seconded by Mro Palmer, public hearing on proposed amended Sub- division Ordinance was carried over to the regular March 15, 1962, Board Neeting. Statements of Expenses of the Department of Finance, the Sheriff's Office, the Office of the Co~monwea!th's Attorney for the month of January, 196~, were presented, and on motion of ~r. Thraves, seconded by Mr. Suther!and, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Statement of Expenses incurred in the maintenance of the County Jail was submitted along With Summary Statement of Prisoner Days for the month of January, 1962. On motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Garnett, these Statements were examined, verified and approved. Claim of the Jail Physician for the month of January, 1962, in the amount of $14.00 was presented, and on motion of Mr. Harris, seconded by~r. Garnett, was approved for payment. Reports of the Department of Public Welfare for the month of January, 1962, were presented in accordance with Sections 63-67.1 and 63-67.2 of the Code of Virginia. ~laim of the University of Virginia Hospital in the amount of $862.75 for hospitalization of indigent patients was received and on motion of ~r. Sutherland, seconded by Mr. Thraves, was approved for payment, Claim of the County Executive for the month of January, 1962, was presented, approved, and On motion of Mr. Garnett, seconded by Mr. Harris, rules with regard to second reading were suspended and the following resolution unanimously adopted: BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that the following appropriations be and the same hereby are made for the month of March, 1962, from the funds and for the functions or purposes indicated; GENIAL REVENUE FUND: For the operation of general county agencies and services, to be transferred to the General Operating Fund and expended only on order of the Board of Supervisors, as follows: lA Board of County Supervisors 1AA Miscellaneous Services lB County Executive's Office lC Department of Finance 1D Collection of Delinquent Land Taxes 1E Board of Equalization 1F Tax Map 1G County Planning Commission 1H Industrial Advancement and Development 4 Recording of Documents 5A Circuit Court 5B County Court 5C Commonwealth Attorney's Office 6A Policing and Investigating 6C Confinement and Care of Prisoners 7 Fire Prevention and Extinction Operation of County Dump No. 1 7C Operation of County Dump No. 2 7E Operation of County Dump No. 4 8D Public Welfare - Lunacy Commission 9 Public Health ll Advancement of Agriculture and Home Economics 13 Elections 14 Maintenance of Buildings and Grounds 15 General Stores Total Appropriations to General Operating Fund For the operation of the Department of Welfare, to be transferred to the Virginia Public Assistance Fund and expended only on order of the Welfare Board 650~00 3,601.35 275.00 7+,400.00 50.00 700.00 233.34 2,023.31 25.OO 650.00 4, 8gl. 66 1,073.33 79.o0 2,140.00 140.00 !40.O0 3,000.00 975.OO 50.00-$A 1,225.00 $ 26,271.99 $ 24,401.00 For the operation of Public Schools, to be trans- ferred to the School Fund and expended only on order of the School Board, as follows: 17 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.7+ 17.5 Administration Instruction Evening, Part-Time, etc. Other Instructional Costs Co-Ordinate Activities Auxiliary Agencies - Transportation of Pupils 17.51 Other Auxiliary Agencies 17.6 Operation of School Plant 17.61 Maintenance of School Plant 17.7 Fixed Charges 17.10 Operating Costs - Jackson P. Burley High School 17.8 Capital Outlay Total ~or Operating ~ublic Schools For Scholarships in aid of education, to be trans- ferred to the Scholarship Fund, and expended only on order of the. School Board $ 2,610.83 107,751.59 1,780.00 4,400.00 37O.OO 16,300 · O0 8,100.00 400.00 3,450.00 5,000-00 1,200.00 ~,~__ . ~ -0-_~' "."~ 815t,362.42~ $ 60,000.00 For the operation of the Joint Health Department, to be transferred to the Joint Health Department Fund and expended only on order of the Joint Health Board. TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS FROI~ GENERAL REVENUE FUND $269,872.91 DOG TAX FUND: For the protection of livestock and fowl and other operations of the Dog Tax Fund, to be expended only on order of the Board of Supervisors $ 450~007 CENTRAL FIRE DISTriCT FD~ND: For the operation Of the Central Fire District, to be expended only on order of the Board of Supervisors CROZET SANITARY DISTRICT FUND: For the operation of the Crozet Sanitary District, to be expended only on order of the Board of Supervisors $ 5OO.OO SPECIAL SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND: For construction on special school projects, _to be transferred to the Special School Capital Outlay Fmud, and expended only on order of the School Board. 19.1 Scottsville High School 19.3 West Side Elementary School 19.5 Esmont Elementary School 19.6 Shadwell Elementary School 19.7 Albemarle High School 19.8 Meriwether Lewis Elementary School 19.9 Greenwood Elementary School 19.lO Re~ Hill Elementary School 19.11 Crozet Elementary School 19.12 Stony Point Elementary School 19.13 Broadus Wood Elementary School Total Special School Capital Outlay Fund $ 90,000.00 2,514.48 1,629.18 4,A71.5~ 18,737.63 1,5A5.75 1,971.00 4,754.42 158,653.72 75,002.36 66,328.33 $425,608.R~ $697,516.~3 GRAND TOTAL OF ALL APPROPRIATIONS FROM ALL FUNDS Communication was received from the City Co~cil enclosing resolution with regard to the Blue Ridge Sanatorium and was ordered filed. Communications were received from Senator E. O. McCue, Jr. and Delegate Richard H. ~iddleton acknowledging receipt of resolutions from this Board adored at the last regular meeting. Report was received from the Insurance Committee recommending that the County continue its present contract with Travelers Insurance Company for-group insurance of its employees and recommendin further that such insurance program be reviewed annually. On motion of Mr. Sutherland, seconded by~r. Harris, this report was accepted, and ordered filed. Communication was received from Hugh F. Simms, Jr.., Real Estate Assessor, advising that his office had erroneously assessed house belonging to John N. Crafaik located at 2806 Northfields Road, and investigatibn proved that said hause was only ~0% complete as of January 1, 1961. The letter stated further that ~ax~on the full assessment amounted to $142.84 whereas the tax on the basis of 40% would have been $56.98, entitling Mr. Crafaik to a refund of $85~86. On motion of Mr. Harris, seconded hyMr. Palmer, It was ordered that Mr. Crafaik be refunded $85186 on the basis of Mr. Simms' report. The County Executive advised that photostatic copy of letter from State-Planters under date of August 4, 1961, had been received from the National Bank with regard to substitution of securities under escrow. He further advised that the County's copy of this communication had apparently gone astray. On motion of Mr. Sutherland, seconded by Mr. Harris, the following resolution was unanimously adopted, ratifying the above mentioned change in escrow: WHEREAS, the National Bank and Trust Company, Charlottesville, Virginia, Depository, has requested the substitution of certain securities held by the State Planters Bank of Commerce and Trusts, Richmond, Virginia, Escrow Agent, in accor- dance with Escrow Agreement by and between the National Bank and Trust Company, the State Planters Bank of Commerce and Trusts, M. N. Pence, Director of Finance of the County of Albemarle, and the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County-. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that the National Bank be and is hereby authorized to pledge the following: $26,000.00 U.S. Treasury 3-3/4% Notes due 8/15/64. #28230 (1M) 13852 (5M) 43224/25 (2 x iOM) with 2/15/62 and s.c.a. AND, upon the pledge and delivery of the foregoing, the State Planters Bank of commerce and Trusts is-hereby authorized to release the following: $26,000.00 U.S. Treasury 2-3/4% Bonds due 9/15/61. The following resolution was received from the Albemarle County Planning Commission: BE IT RESOLVED: That the Albemarle County Planning Commission, with the concurrence of the County Board of Suoervisors, urge the General Assembly of Virginia to consider carefully the implications of House Bill Number 10, which has many objectionable features, among which are: ArC,clue t _ para~l -~, which gives planning commissions powers beyond those which are solely advisory. Article 2 Par_a~ ~hs ~r962 t~962_~., which confers powers on INTERSTATE regional planning commissions to the derogation of the pow~rs of local elected officials. ~ Article ~Par~h~5~-~6~, which limits the use of privately owned property after is has .... ~_ been recorded on "an official mapt', obviously a violation of private property rights, as eminent domain is not involved. Articl~~a~r~a~hl_.~Z~67.~, which permits concurrent jurisdiction over county areas by several municipalities with possible overlapping jurisdictions. On motion of ~r. Palmer, seconded by Nr. Thraves, the foreoing resolution was approved and it was ordered that copies be mailed to Senator E. O. ~cCue, Jr., Delegate Richard H. Niddleton, and the Committee on Towns, Cities and Counties. Nr. Thraves stated that he wished~is objection recorded to the amount of license tax being charged under the present Ordinance for female dog tags. ~r. Thraves was advised that this ordinance could not be amended at this time due to the fact that 1962 dog tags EaR been on sale since November l, 1961, and the majority of 1962 tags had been sold. Co~aunication was received from Dr. Alfred F. De, ilia regard this Board's denial of his Dog Tax Claim dated November 23, 1961. Dr. DeNilia stated that the Deg Narden recommended that this claim be paid. However, upon examination of the claim, it was found that the Dog Warden noted on same "Claim in doubt". It was ordered that Dr. De~ilia be advised of this fact. Claims against the Dog Tax Fund were received from Nr. Robert F. Howard for three ewes killed by dogs. On motion of Nr. ~hraves, seconded by Nr. Harris, ~r. Howard was allowed ~18.OO for each of these ewes. Claims against the Dog Tax Fund were received from Nr;~T. A. Goodall for five ewes killed by dogs. On motion of ~r. Thraves, .seconded by Nr. Harris, ~r. Goodall was allowed $15.00 for each of these ewes. Claim against the Dog Tax Fund was received from Nr. William Thompkins for two pigs killed by dogs. On motion of Nr. %braves, seconded by Mr. Harris, Nr. Thompkins was allowed $12.00 for each of these pigs. Nelfare Budget for the year ending June 30, 1963, was received and on motion of Nr. Sutherland seconded by ~r. Palmer, the same :was approved in the following amounts: Federal .......... $166,~00.00 State ........... !66,885.00 Local ............ 66,777.00 On. motion of Nr. Thraves, seconded by Mr. Palmer, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County~ Virginia, that representatives in the Leg.islature be and they are hereby re- quested to seek permissive legislation which would allow Albemarle County to pay Welfare clients by voucher rather than by cash. On motion of Nr. Harris, seconded by Nr. Thraves, Nr. R. C. Sours, Assistant Director of Finance, was also named Director of Taxation, and the County Executive and Asst. County Executive were directed to ~ provide~ the Finance Committee with an outline of duties of the Director of Taxatio~ said outline to be approved by the Committee and presented to this Board at the next regular meeting for approval. Claims against the County amounting to $253,253.23 were presented, examined and allowed and certified to the Director of Finance for payment, and charged against the following funds: General Operating Fund School Operating Fund Dog Tax Fund Crozet Sanitary District Fund Joint Health Fund Virginia Public Assistance Fund Scholarship Fund Central Fire District Fund Comm. of Va. Current Credit Account On motion, the meeting adjourned. Total $ 27,966.60 148,808.23 511.95 9~2.51 6,984.46 21,129.85 21,407.71 4,153.43 $253,253.23 Chairman